Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 228(7): 1074-81, 2006 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16579787

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SAMPLE POPULATION: 128 farms. PROCEDURE: Samples and data were collected every 2 months from August 2000 to October 2001. Fecal samples were collected from calves and cows. Milk samples were obtained from the bulk tank and milk line filters. Environmental samples were obtained from a water source, feed bunks of lactating cows, and cattle housing areas. Campylobacter identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed at a central laboratory by use of microbroth dilution with 2 customized antimicrobial susceptibility panels. RESULTS: 460 and 1,570 Campylobacter isolates were obtained from organic and conventional dairy farms, respectively. Most isolates from both farm types were susceptible to most antimicrobial agents tested, and antimicrobial susceptibility of conventional dairy isolates was decreased, compared with organic dairy isolates. Low proportions of isolates resistant to ampicillin (< 10%) and moderate proportions resistant (30% to 60%) to kanamycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline were observed on both farm types. The proportion of isolates resistant to tetracycline was higher for conventional than organic farms. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Campylobacter isolates from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally had similar patterns of antimicrobial resistance; the proportion of resistant isolates was higher for conventional than organic farms.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Campylobacter/drug effects , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dairying , Feces/microbiology , Female , Longitudinal Studies , Midwestern United States , Milk/microbiology , New England
2.
J Food Prot ; 69(3): 482-8, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16541675

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter is one of the most common causes of gastroenteritis and can be acquired through contact with farm animals or the consumption of raw milk. Because of concerns over the role of food-producing animals in the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance to humans, we evaluated the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolates from dairy farms and the genetic mechanism conferring the observed resistance. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance was completed on 912 isolates from conventional and 304 isolates from organic dairy farms to eight drugs (azithromycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, and tetracycline) with microbroth dilution. Resistance to seven of eight drugs was very low and did not differ by farm type. However, tetracycline resistance was common in Campylobacter isolated from both organic and conventional dairy farms, with 48 and 58% of isolates affected, respectively. By multiplex PCR, we determined that tetracycline resistance was highly associated with the carriage of tetO in Campylobacter isolates (X2 = 124, P < 0.01, kappa = 0.86).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Campylobacter/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Milk/microbiology , Tetracycline/pharmacology , Animals , Campylobacter/genetics , Cattle , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Dairying/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Food Microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , United States
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 56(4): 686-91, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16131517

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the agreement between microbroth dilution and agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni. METHODS: Utilizing commercially prepared antimicrobial panels, microbroth dilution was compared with agar dilution for determining antimicrobial susceptibility in C. jejuni isolates. To assess the performance of both techniques for ampicillin, 190 C. jejuni isolates from dairy cattle were utilized. A group of 172 C. jejuni isolates from dairy sources were used to compare the susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, nalidixic acid and tetracycline. RESULTS: Our results indicate that microbroth dilution and agar dilution agree within +/-1 log2 dilution for 86.7% of the isolates tested. Ciprofloxacin had the highest level of agreement for isolates tested by both techniques, resulting in a kappa of 0.886 and 97.1% agreement +/-1 log2 dilution. The least agreement was observed in determining the susceptibility of isolates to ampicillin and erythromycin (82.1 and 79.7% agreement +/-1 log2 dilution). However, kappa statistics were considered to have good agreement for these antimicrobials. There were no significant differences in the summary statistics for any of the five antimicrobials evaluated for the isolates analysed by the percentage of resistant isolates, MIC50, MIC75 or MIC90 beyond +/-1 log2 dilution. There was no association in the classification of resistance by the testing methods employed. We also demonstrated that the quality control strain of C. jejuni ATCC 33650 performed in a consistent manner for both agar dilution and microbroth dilution. CONCLUSIONS: Microbroth dilution may be an acceptable alternative to agar dilution for determining susceptibility of C. jejuni in research or surveillance where flow of samples, labour efficiency and cost may restrict the use of agar dilution.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Campylobacter jejuni/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/instrumentation , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Ampicillin/pharmacology , Animals , Automation , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Cattle , Erythromycin/pharmacology , Nalidixic Acid/pharmacology , Tetracycline/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...