Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biochemistry ; 40(36): 10881-91, 2001 Sep 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11535065

ABSTRACT

Here we report an EPR signal that is induced by a pH jump to alkaline pH in the S(3) state of the oxygen-evolving complex in photosystem II. The S(3) state is first formed with two flashes at pH 6. Thereafter, the pH is changed in the dark prior to freezing of the sample. The EPR signal is 90-100 G wide and centered around g = 2. The signal is reversibly induced with a pK = 8.5 +/- 0.3 and is very stable with a decay half-time of 5-6 min. If the pH is changed in the dark from pH 8.6 to 6.0, the signal disappears although the S(3) state remains. We propose that the signal arises from the interaction between the Mn cluster and Y(Z), resulting in the spin-coupled S(2)Y(Z)(*) signal. Our data suggest that the potential of the Y(Z)(*)/Y(Z) redox couple is sensitive to the ambient pH in the S(3) state. The alkaline pH decreases the potential of the Y(Z)(*)/Y(Z) couple so that Y(Z) can give back an electron to the S(3) state, thereby obtaining the S(2)Y(Z)(*) EPR signal. The tyrosine oxidation also involves proton release from Y(Z), and the results support a mechanism where this proton is released to the bulk medium presumably via a close-lying base. Thus, the equilibrium is changed from S(3)Y(Z) to S(2)Y(Z)(*) by the alkaline pH. At normal pH (pH 5.5-7), this equilibrium is set strongly to the S(3)Y(Z) state. The results are discussed in relation to the present models of water oxidation. Consequences for the relative redox potentials of Y(Z)(*)/Y(Z) and S(3)/S(2) at different pH values are discussed. We also compare the pH-induced S(2)Y(Z)(*) signal with the S(2)Y(Z)(*) signal from Ca(2+)-depleted photosystem II.


Subject(s)
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Oxygen/metabolism , Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins/chemistry , Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins/metabolism , Chlorophyll/metabolism , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy , Half-Life , Kinetics , Light , Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes , Magnetics , Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins/radiation effects , Photosystem II Protein Complex , Spinacia oleracea/metabolism
2.
Biochim Biophys Acta ; 1503(1-2): 83-95, 2001 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11115626

ABSTRACT

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is one of the major techniques used to analyse the structure and function of the water oxidising complex (WOC) in Photosystem II. The discovery of an EPR signal from the S0 state has opened the way for new experiments, aiming to characterise the S0 state and elucidate the differences between the different S states. We present a review of the biochemical and biophysical characterisation of the S0 state multiline signal that has evolved since its discovery, and compare these results to previous and recent data from the S2 multiline signal. We also present some new data from the S2 state reached on the second turnover of the enzyme.


Subject(s)
Manganese/chemistry , Organometallic Compounds/chemistry , Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins/chemistry , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Methanol , Microwaves , Oxygen/chemistry , Photosystem II Protein Complex , Temperature , Water/chemistry
3.
Biochemistry ; 39(23): 6763-72, 2000 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10841755

ABSTRACT

We have studied the pH effect on the S(0) and S(2) multiline electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals from the water-oxidizing complex of photosystem II. Around pH 6, the maximum signal intensities were detected. On both the acidic and alkaline sides of pH 6, the intensities of the EPR signals decreased. Two pKs were determined for the S(0) multiline signal; pK(1) = 4.2 +/- 0.2 and pK(2) = 8.0 +/- 0.1, and for the S(2) multiline signal the pKs were pK(1) = 4.5 +/- 0.1 and pK(2) = 7.6 +/- 0.1. The intensity of the S(0)-state EPR signal was partly restored when the pH was changed from acidic or alkaline pH back to pH approximately 6. In the S(2) state we observed partial recovery of the multiline signal when going from alkaline pH back to pH approximately 6, whereas no significant recovery of the S(2) multiline signal was observed when the pH was changed from acidic pH back to pH approximately 6. Several possible explanations for the intensity changes as a function of pH are discussed. Some are ruled out, such as disintegration of the Mn cluster or decay of the S states and formal Cl(-) and Ca(2+) depletion. The altered EPR signal intensities probably reflect the protonation/deprotonation of ligands to the Mn cluster or the oxo bridges between the Mn ions. Also, the possibility of decreased multiline signal intensities at alkaline pH as an effect of changed redox potential of Y(Z) is put forward.


Subject(s)
Photosynthetic Reaction Center Complex Proteins/chemistry , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Manganese/chemistry , Membrane Proteins/chemistry , Oxidation-Reduction , Oxygen/metabolism , Photosystem II Protein Complex , Spinacia oleracea
4.
Biochim Biophys Acta ; 1412(3): 240-9, 1999 Aug 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10482786

ABSTRACT

The Mn-derived electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) multiline signal from the S(0) state of the water-oxidizing complex is observable only in the presence methanol. In the present study, we have characterized the effect of methanol on the EPR signals from the S(0) and S(2) states as well as on the EPR Signal II(slow) originating from the Tyrosine(D)(ox) radical. The amplitudes of the S(0) and S(2) multiline signals increase with the methanol concentration in a similar way, whereas the S(2) g=4.1 excited state signal amplitude shows a concomitant decrease. The methanol concentration at which half of the spectral change has occurred is approximately 0.2% and the effect is saturating around 5%. Methanol has an effect on the microwave power saturation of the S(2) multiline signal, as well. The microwave power at half saturation (P(1/2)) is 85 mW in the presence of methanol, whereas the signal relaxes much slower (P(1/2) approximately 27 mW) without. The relaxation of Signal II(slow) in the presence of methanol has also been investigated. The P(1/2) value of Signal II(slow) oscillates with the S cycle in a similar way as without methanol, but the P(1/2) values are consistently lower in the methanol-containing samples. From the results, we conclude that methanol modifies the magnetic properties of the S(0) and S(2) states in a similar way. The possible site and nature of methanol binding is discussed.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...