Perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the prevention of spinal ischemia after endovascular aortic repair.

Endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic diseases is accompanied by a risk of spinal ischemia in 1-19% of patients, depending on the entity and extent of the disease. The use of perioperative drainage of cerebrospinal fluid is one of the invasive measures to reduce the occurrence of this severe complication. This article reviews the incidence of spinal ischemia, its risk factors, the evidence for carrying out cerebrospinal fluid drainage and its modern use by means of an automated, pressure controlled system (LiquoGuard®7).

Finite element analysis in asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: in search of new rupture risk predictors.

OBJECTIVES: To compare biomechanical rupture risk parameters of asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using finite element analysis (FEA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective biomechanical single center analysis of asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured AAAs. Comparison of biomechanical parameters from FEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2011 to 2013 computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 30 asymptomatic, 15 symptomatic, and 15 ruptured AAAs were collected consecutively. FEA was performed according to the successive steps of AAA vessel reconstruction, segmentation and finite element computation. Biomechanical parameters Peak Wall Rupture Risk Index (PWRI), Peak Wall Stress (PWS), and Rupture Risk Equivalent Diameter (RRED) were compared among the three subgroups. RESULTS: PWRI differentiated between asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs (p < .0004) better than PWS (p < .1453). PWRI-dependent RRED was higher in the symptomatic subgroup compared with the asymptomatic subgroup (p < .0004). Maximum AAA external diameters were comparable between the two groups (p < .1355). Ruptured AAAs showed the highest values for external diameter, total intraluminal thrombus volume, PWS, RRED, and PWRI compared with asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs. In contrast with symptomatic and ruptured AAAs, none of the asymptomatic patients had a PWRI value >1.0. This threshold value might identify patients at imminent risk of rupture. CONCLUSIONS: From different FEA derived parameters, PWRI distinguishes most precisely between asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs. If elevated, this value may represent a negative prognostic factor for asymptomatic AAAs.

[Nellix® endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) - a new technology for endovascular management of infrarenal aortic aneurysms]. / Nellix® Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) - eine neue Technologie zur endovaskulären Ausschaltung infrarenaler Aortenaneurysmen.

BACKGROUND: Recently used endografts for envascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) exclude the pathology by fixation at both the proximal and distal landing zone. Due to endoleaks and migration EVAR is associated with a relevant rate of secondary interventions. The Nellix® system (Endologix Inc., CA, USA) was developed to seal the complete aneurysm using a polymer filling, therefore stabilising endograft-position and reducing the rate of endoleaks and reinterventions. The present contribution introduces the method, describes the technique of implantation and presents the first clinical results. Material und Methods: The Nellix system consists of two balloon-expandable stent grafts made of a cobalt-chromium composition, surrounded with ePTFE and the so-called endobags. During the implantation each endobag is filled with a non-biodegradable polymer, sealing the aneurysm lumina including the proximal and distal landing zone. Hence, lumbar arteries will be sealed to reduce the probability of a type II endoleak. RESULTS: Longterm durability as well as the structural integrity of the Nellix system has been proven over 4 years in sheep experiments. The technical success in a multicentre, prospective registry was 94% without the appearance of severe adverse events (migration, occlusion, secondary endoleak). CONCLUSION: EVAS is a new and different concept of endovascular AAA repair. Recent clinical data of the Nellix system are promising showing a high technical success rate while the need for secondary intervention is low. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed.

[Endovascular therapy of para-anastomotic aneurysms of the aorta. Technical options]. / Endovaskuläre Therapie paraanastomaler aortaler Aneurysmen. Technische Möglichkeiten.

BACKGROUND: Open repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms (pAAA) after conventional aortoiliac repair is associated with a high perioperative mortality and morbidity. Endovascular treatment options have evolved over the last decade. The aim of this article is to demonstrate and review these endovascular strategies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 01/2009 and 06/2012, a total of 12 patients received endovascular treatment for proximal (n = 7) or distal (n = 5) pAAA (n = 2 contained rupture). A retrospective analysis of these patients was performed. Median age was 71.5 years (range 55-87 years). The median time interval between primary operation and endovascular repair of the pAAA was 15 years (range 1-31 years) and median follow-up was 1.3 years (range 0 days - 3 years). Endovascular exclusion of the pAAA was achieved by implantation of an aortouniiliac endograft (n = 6), chimney graft (n = 1), fenestrated endograft (n = 2) and iliac extension (n = 3). RESULTS: Technical success could be achieved in all patients and in-hospital mortality was 16.8  % (n = 2). No patient required a reintervention but during follow-up one additional patient died due to gastrointestinal bleeding. No primary or secondary type I/III endoleaks were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a not negligible mortality rate endovascular treatment of para-anastomotic aneurysms and anastomotic pseudoaneurysms appears to be a safe alternative for conventional open repair.

Decision-making and techniques in hypogastric artery revascularization.

The aim of this article was to describe and discuss the currently available endovascular and open surgical techniques to preserve or occlude the hypogastric artery during aortoiliac aneurysm repair and thus support the process of decision-making in hypogastric artery revascularization.

Accuracy and variability of semiautomatic centerline analysis versus manual aortic measurement techniques for TEVAR.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to test whether inter-observer variability and time of diameter measurements for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are improved by semiautomatic centerline analysis compared to manual assessment. METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiographies of 30 patients with thoracic aortic disease (mean age 66.8 ± 11.6 years, 23 males) were retrospectively analysed by two blinded experts in vascular radiology. Maximum aortic diameters at three positions relevant to TEVAR were assessed (P1, distal to left common carotid artery; P2, distal to left subclavian artery; and P3, proximal to coeliac trunk) using three measurement techniques: manual axial slices (axial), manual double-oblique multiplanar reformations (MPRs) and semiautomatic centerline analysis. RESULTS: Diameter measurements by both centerline analysis and the axial technique did not significantly differ from MPR (p = 0.17 and p = 0.37). Total deviation index for 0.9 was for P1 2.7 mm (axial), 3.7 mm (MPR), 1.8 mm (centerline); for P2 2.0 mm (axial), 3.6 mm (MPR), 1.8 mm (centerline); and for P3 3.0 mm (axial), 3.5 mm (MPR), 2.5 mm (centerline). Measurement time using centerline analysis was significantly shorter than for assessment by MPR. CONCLUSIONS: Centerline analysis provides the least variable and fast diameter measurements in TEVAR patients with the same accuracy as the current reference standard MPR.

[Thoracic aortic aneurysm]. / Thorakales Aortenaneurysma.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) are the most common pathology of the thoracic aorta. TAA are occuring with increasing incidence (10.4 cases per 100,000 person years) and are most commonly caused by atherosclerosis. There are also hereditary, inflammatory and infectious pathogenic factors. A TAA initially causes no symptoms and is therefore usually diagnosed as an incidental finding. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are the diagnostic tools of choice for diagnosis and treatment planning. The mean growth rate of TAA is estimated to be 0.10 to 0.42 cm per year. A diameter of 6 cm is considered to be an indication for surgery. Besides medicinal therapy, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) nowadays offers certain advantages compared to conventional open repair. The same applies to the region of the aortic arch. Follow up examinations after TEVAR are of major importance in order to ensure long-term therapeutic success.

Penetrating aortic ulcer: defining risks and therapeutic strategies.

In addition to classic aortic dissection and intramural hematoma, acute aortic syndrome also includes penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU). The recent advent of highly detailed axial imaging allows closer assessment of PAU and its pathophysiology. However, there is still ongoing discussion about the natural history of the disease, leading to challenging questions concerning the optimal treatment strategy, particularly in asymptomatic patients. In this review, current indications for treatment, with an emphasis on PAU repair in the endovascular era, are discussed.

Local anaesthesia for endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to analyse and report the results of a 'local anaesthesia first' approach in elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2007 and August 2010, a total of 217 continuous patients (187 men, median age 76 years, range 52-94 years) underwent elective EVAR using this approach, with predefined exclusion criteria for local anaesthesia (LA). A retrospective analysis regarding technical feasibility, mortality, complication and endoleak rate was performed. The results are reported as an observational study. RESULTS: LA was applied in 183 patients (84%), regional anaesthesia (RA) in nine patients (4%) and general anaesthesia (GA) in 25 patients (12%). Anaesthetic conversion from LA to GA was necessary in 14 patients (7.6%). Airway obstruction (n = 4) and persistent coughing (n = 3) were the most common causes for conversion to GA. Thirty-day mortality in the LA group was 2.7%, with 16/183 patients (8.7%) experiencing postoperative complications. All type I endoleaks (n = 5, 2.7%) occurred in patients with LA and challenging aneurysm morphologies. CONCLUSIONS: A 'local anaesthesia first' strategy can successfully be applied in 75% of patients undergoing EVAR. The use of LA can impact imaging quality and thus precise endograft placement, which should be considered in patients with challenging aneurysm morphologies.

Treatment of an asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer in a young patient.

We want to report and discuss the indication for open surgery for an asymptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) in the era of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). A 31-year-old female presented with the diagnosis of an aneurysm in the distal aortic arch. With respect to the patients young age, the controversial status of connective tissue disorders and in the absence of concomitant disease, open repair was indicated. There was no proof of a mycotic plaque or connective tissue disease in the microbiological-, pathological analysis and at electron-microscopy. The patient was discharged on the thirteenth postoperative day. In spite of good preliminary results of TEVAR in PAU, in selective cases there is still an indication for open surgery.

Endografting in the aortic arch - does the proximal landing zone influence outcome?

OBJECTIVES: To analyse early and midterm results of thoracic aortic endografting (TEVAR) in the aortic arch. METHODS: Between January 1997 and February 2009 178 patients received TEVAR in the aortic arch at our institution. This population was subdivided into four groups according to the proximal landing zone (LZ) classification in the aortic arch by Ishimaru et al. and a retrospective analysis regarding perioperative mortality, morbidity and endoleak formation was performed. RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality rate was 14% with no statistical significant difference between LZ's 0-3 (p=0.274). Renal insufficiency (hazard ratio (HR) 2.5; p=0.0119), age >75 years (HR 3.1; p=0.0019) and emergency procedures (HR 8.9; p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of death. There was no significant difference regarding type I (p=0.07) or type III (p=0.49) endoleaks between the proximal LZs, but a significant difference regarding the development of type II endoleaks (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no influence of the proximal LZ on perioperative mortality and morbidity rate. Furthermore it did not influence relevant (type I/III) endoleak formation.

Hybrid approach for arch and thoracoabdominal pathologies.

The endovascular era began about 20 years ago and subsequently revolutionized vascular surgery as a less invasive treatment option, especially for high risk patients. In the late 1990s, a new hybrid approach for arch and thoracoabdominal pathologies was developed. Debranching and rerouting supra-aortic and visceral aortic branches with extra-anatomic bypass grafting was performed in order to achieve sufficient landing zones demanding for subsequent stent grafting. The initial single-center results of small series up to 20 patients were encouraging with acceptable complication rates. Hybrid arch procedures are feasible but seem to carry risks. However, the latest reports for thoracoabdominal hybrid procedures demand a word of caution due to high morbidity rates. The hybrid approach may be reserved for a selected comorbid patient cohort, which is regarded unfit for open reconstruction.

The visceral hybrid repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms--a collaborative approach.

OBJECTIVE: To report the collaborative data of 3 major European Vascular Units using the 'visceral hybrid' procedure for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms and dissections. METHODS: A consecutive series of 107 urgent and elective high-risk patients were included in a prospectively collected database. RESULTS: All stents involved the entire thoracic and abdominal aorta with left subclavian coverage in 19 and revascularisation in 12. The distal landing zone was in the infra-renal aorta in 75% and in the iliac artery in 25%. The 30-day mortality rate was 16/107 (14.95%). 13/107 (12.1%) of the patients suffered spinal cord ischaemia which was complete and permanent in 9/12 (8.4%). 4 patients (3.7%) required long term dialysis and a segment of gut infarction requiring resection occurred in 3 (2.8%). Most patients had visceral bypass grafting and aortic stent-grafting performed in one stage. In 18 patients the stenting was performed later. Three of these patients ruptured before the stenting procedure was undertaken. CONCLUSION: These early results of visceral hybrid repair for high-risk patients with complex thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms are encouraging, in a group of patients in whom fenestrated/branched stent-grafting is not an option and open surgery hazardous.

[Endovascular aortic surgery: management of secondary aortobronchial and aorto-enteral fistulas]. / Endovaskuläre Aortenchirurgie: Management sekundärer aortobronchialer und -enteraler Fisteln.

Secondary aortobronchial or aorto-enteral fistulas have an incidence of 0.36-4% and are a rare but life-threatening complication after endovascular aorta reconstruction. Due to the rarity of the disease and the heterogeneity of the patients (age, risk profile, localization) individual-specific solutions are necessary. The primary symptomatic, differential diagnosis and individual therapy concepts will be presented and discussed based of five case reports (2 aorto-esophageal fistulas, 2 aortobronchial fistulas and 1 aorto-duodenal fistula).

Intracranial dissection during carotid endarterectomy treated by carotid stenting.

Intracranial dissection of the internal carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a serious complication with a potentially fatal outcome. We report on a 67 male with a symptomatic high grad stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Intraoperative completion angiography showed a thrombotic occlusion and the internal carotid artery (ICA) was resected with interposition of a Dacron graft. Completion angiography then revealed a dissection of the petreous ICA, which was corrected by insertion of a coronary artery stent.Stenting of the ICA is a useful tool to restore cerebral perfusion without time delay and completion imaging is extremely helpful for early detection of dissection during CEA.

[Paraplegia after endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta]. / Paraplegie nach endovaskulärer Therapie der thorakalen und thorakoabdominellen Aorta.

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse the incidence and aetiology of paraplegia secondary to endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta (TEVAR). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in the patients treated at our facility between March 1997 and April 2007. During this interval, 173 patients (163 men; median age: 62 years) underwent endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. Indications for treatment were thoracic aortic aneurysms in 36 patients, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in 33 patients, type B dissections in 43 patients, type A dissections in 5 patients, penetrating aortic ulcers in 31 patients, traumatic aortic transections in 9 patients, post-traumatic aortic aneurysms in 5 patients, aortobronchial fistulas in 8 patients, aortic patch ruptures in 2 patients, and an anastomotic aortic aneurysm in 1 patient. 101 procedures (58%) were conducted as emergency interventions while 72 were elective. Device design and implant strategy were chosen on the basis of an evaluation of morphology from a computed tomographic scan. Clinical assessment and imaging of the aorta (CT or magnetic resonance imaging) during follow up were performed prior to discharge, at 6 and 12 months, and then annually. RESULTS: A primary technical success was achieved in 170 patients (98%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 9.2%. Length of follow-up ranged from 1 to 96 months, with a mean of 52 months. Paraplegia or paraparesis developed in 3 patients (1.7%). Two of these patients had a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm and the third a chronic expanding type B dissection, being treated with hybrid procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta is associated with a relatively low risk for postoperative paraplegia or paraparesis. Patients requiring long segment aortic coverage, and with prior aortic replacement are especially at risk.

Imaging modalities for the thoracic aorta.

Almost 50 years after its introduction intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been passed as the gold standard for diagnostic imaging of the aorta. Today's performance of multi-detector-row computed tomography angiography (CTA) as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) offer remarkable improvements in the field of diagnostic cardiovascular imaging. The racy developments not only concerning image acquisition but also image postprocessing offer a multidimensional approach to assess anatomy and pathology of individual patients in a few minutes. Four-dimensional visualization assists us to select the ''adequate'' patient, quantify vascular and adjacent geometries, and select the appropriate device to realize even complex thoracic endovascular aortic reconstructions (TEVAR). There is still a discrepancy between perioperative and intraoperative imaging--but new technologies made also some progress in this field. Lifelong imaging surveillance of TEVAR and bypasses is still a critical component of patient care and requires comparable imaging and postprocessing capabilities as for the preoperative setting. Although is the most commonly used examination for imaging surveillance, MRA, chest x-ray and DSA all have their role in determining complications and their management.

Surgical treatment of primary soft tissue sarcomas involving the chest: experiences in 25 patients.

BACKGROUND: Primary soft tissue sarcomas of the chest wall are uncommon and data concerning treatment and results are sparse. We reviewed our experience with chest wall resections of these lesions. METHODS: Retrospective review of our database identified 25 patients (12 men, 13 women) who underwent chest wall resection for primary soft tissue sarcoma during the 18-year study period (January 1984 through to January 2002). The mean follow-up period was 46.5 months. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was zero. The cumulative 5-year survival rate of all 25 patients was 56.9 %, and the median survival 99.5 months. This compared with 42.2 % and a median survival of 36.0 months after chest wall resection for high grade tumor histology. Histological type grading clearly influenced long-term survival ( P = 0.036). Local recurrence occurred in 9 patients, 6 of 8 who were resected with positive margins and 3 of 17 who were resected with negative margins. Chest wall resections extended with lung resections did not significantly impair postoperative pulmonary function compared to patients without concomitant lung resections. CONCLUSIONS: Chest wall resections in primary soft tissue sarcomas can be accomplished safely with a low mortality rate. Long-term survival can be achieved for primary soft tissue sarcomas but histological grading is of prognostic significance.

Surgical resection of secondary chest wall tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate which factors influence survival following surgical resection of secondary tumors of the chest wall (non-bronchial carcinoma). METHODS: Between 1990 and 2001, 69 patients (23 men, 46 women) underwent chest wall resection with curative intent. All of the patients were retrospectively analyzed for sex and age, presenting symptoms, tumor location, disease-free interval, histology, radiation therapy or chemotherapy, surgical techniques and extent of resection, 30-day mortality and long-term survival. RESULTS: The most common tumors were isolated locally recurrent breast cancer (n = 33) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 17). Resection of chest wall tumors in all of the other patients revealed a kaleidoscope of different pathologies (n = 19). Overall 5-year survival was 38 %. In patients with isolated recurrence of breast cancer and in patients with chest wall metastases of renal cell cancer, the median survival was 40.6 months and 53.7 months, respectively. A disease-free interval of more than 24 months and no systemic chemotherapy after mastectomy were parameters for a favorable prognosis in patients with breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that chest wall resection of secondary chest wall tumors is a safe and effective treatment as part of a multidisciplinary approach. The role of surgery will continue to evolve as improvements in systemic treatment occur.