A study on interoperability between two Personal Health Train infrastructures in leukodystrophy data analysis.

The development of platforms for distributed analytics has been driven by a growing need to comply with various governance-related or legal constraints. Among these platforms, the so-called Personal Health Train (PHT) is one representative that has emerged over the recent years. However, in projects that require data from sites featuring different PHT infrastructures, institutions are facing challenges emerging from the combination of multiple PHT ecosystems, including data governance, regulatory compliance, or the modification of existing workflows. In these scenarios, the interoperability of the platforms is preferable. In this work, we introduce a conceptual framework for the technical interoperability of the PHT covering five essential requirements: Data integration, unified station identifiers, mutual metadata, aligned security protocols, and business logic. We evaluated our concept in a feasibility study that involves two distinct PHT infrastructures: PHT-meDIC and PADME. We analyzed data on leukodystrophy from patients in the University Hospitals of Tübingen and Leipzig, and patients with differential diagnoses at the University Hospital Aachen. The results of our study demonstrate the technical interoperability between these two PHT infrastructures, allowing researchers to perform analyses across the participating institutions. Our method is more space-efficient compared to the multi-homing strategy, and it shows only a minimal time overhead.

SALUS-A Study on Self-Tonometry for Glaucoma Patients: Design and Implementation of the Electronic Case File.

BACKGROUND: In times of omnipresent digitization and big data, telemedicine and electronic case files (ECFs) are gaining ground for networking between players in the health care sector. In the context of the SALUS study, this approach is applied in practice in the form of electronic platforms to display and process disease-relevant data of glaucoma patients. OBJECTIVES: The SALUS ECF is designed and implemented to support data acquisition and presentation, monitoring, and outcome control for patients suffering from glaucoma in a clinical setting. Its main aim is to provide a means for out- and inpatient exchange of information between various stakeholders with an intuitive user interface in ophthalmologic care. Instrument data, anamnestic data, and diagnostic assessments need to be accessible and historic data stored for patient monitoring. Quality control of the data is ensured by a reading center. METHODS: Based on an intensive requirement analysis, we implemented the ECF as a web-based application in React with a Datomic back-end exposing REST and GraphQL APIs for data access and import. A flexible role management was developed, which addresses the various tasks of multiple stakeholders in the SALUS study. Data security is ensured by a comprehensive encryption concept. We evaluated the usability and efficiency of the ECF by measuring the durations medical doctors need to enter and work with the data. RESULTS: The evaluation showed that the ECF is time-saving in comparison to paper-based assessments and offers supportive monitoring and outcome control for numerical and imaging-related data. By allowing patients and physicians to access the digital ECF, data connectivity as well as patient autonomy were enhanced. CONCLUSION: ECFs have a great potential to efficiently support all patients and stakeholders involved in the care of glaucoma patients. They benefit from the efficient management and view of the data tailored to their specific role.

Decision support for hospital bed management using adaptable individual length of stay estimations and shared resources.

BACKGROUND: Elective patient admission and assignment planning is an important task of the strategic and operational management of a hospital and early on became a central topic of clinical operations research. The management of hospital beds is an important subtask. Various approaches have been proposed, involving the computation of efficient assignments with regard to the patients' condition, the necessity of the treatment, and the patients' preferences. However, these approaches are mostly based on static, unadaptable estimates of the length of stay and, thus, do not take into account the uncertainty of the patient's recovery. Furthermore, the effect of aggregated bed capacities have not been investigated in this context. Computer supported bed management, combining an adaptable length of stay estimation with the treatment of shared resources (aggregated bed capacities) has not yet been sufficiently investigated. The aim of our work is: 1) to define a cost function for patient admission taking into account adaptable length of stay estimations and aggregated resources, 2) to define a mathematical program formally modeling the assignment problem and an architecture for decision support, 3) to investigate four algorithmic methodologies addressing the assignment problem and one base-line approach, and 4) to evaluate these methodologies w.r.t. cost outcome, performance, and dismissal ratio. METHODS: The expected free ward capacity is calculated based on individual length of stay estimates, introducing Bernoulli distributed random variables for the ward occupation states and approximating the probability densities. The assignment problem is represented as a binary integer program. Four strategies for solving the problem are applied and compared: an exact approach, using the mixed integer programming solver SCIP; and three heuristic strategies, namely the longest expected processing time, the shortest expected processing time, and random choice. A baseline approach serves to compare these optimization strategies with a simple model of the status quo. All the approaches are evaluated by a realistic discrete event simulation: the outcomes are the ratio of successful assignments and dismissals, the computation time, and the model's cost factors. RESULTS: A discrete event simulation of 226,000 cases shows a reduction of the dismissal rate compared to the baseline by more than 30 percentage points (from a mean dismissal ratio of 74.7% to 40.06% comparing the status quo with the optimization strategies). Each of the optimization strategies leads to an improved assignment. The exact approach has only a marginal advantage over the heuristic strategies in the model's cost factors (≤3%). Moreover,this marginal advantage was only achieved at the price of a computational time fifty times that of the heuristic models (an average computing time of 141 s using the exact method, vs. 2.6 s for the heuristic strategy). CONCLUSIONS: In terms of its performance and the quality of its solution, the heuristic strategy RAND is the preferred method for bed assignment in the case of shared resources. Future research is needed to investigate whether an equally marked improvement can be achieved in a large scale clinical application study, ideally one comprising all the departments involved in admission and assignment planning.