Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Scand J Caring Sci ; 31(4): 710-717, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233331

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Preventive gynaecological examinations (PGEs) are the main means of monitoring gynaecological cancers across the developed world. The purpose of this study was to investigate the perceptions and attitudes of women of a regional municipality of Greece, regarding preventive gynaecological examinations amid economic crisis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 360 women aged 20-70 years, who lived in an urban area of Greece. A specialised, valid and anonymous questionnaire that included questions about perceptions and attitudes regarding preventive gynaecological examinations was used. The data analysis was performed using the statistical package spss 21. RESULTS: It was found that women who lived in less developed areas had had lower educational levels and higher abstinence rates from medical examinations. The main source of information about sexually transmitted diseases was their social circle (48%), but the gynaecologist is the one preferred (54.8) to inform about preventive gynaecological examinations. Thirty per cent of the participants had never have a mammogram, while 33.9% of the sample did not show the same result, although considered the Pap test necessary. The main cause of women's abstention of preventive gynaecological examinations is the financial crisis. CONCLUSIONS: The current financial crisis has negatively affected the women's ability to afford gynaecological examinations. Therefore, it is necessary to inform the population about the necessity of preventive gynaecological examinations starting from school age and at the same time, health information and promotion campaigns should be launched at a national level.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Models, Economic , Urban Population , Adult , Female , Greece , Humans , Middle Aged
2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 16(4): 1529-34, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25743826

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Overexposure to sun radiation and particularly its accumulation during childhood and adolescence is a significant risk factor for skin cancer development. The sun burn is particularly important. AIM: To estimate sun burn incidence in young pupils in a coastal area of Greece. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two surveys were conducted in a school population in the same district in Greece, over different periods of time, in young people 9 to 18 years old (n=2 977). Anonymous questionnaires were completed. Levels of significance were two- tailed and statistical significance was set at p=0.05. SPSS 17.0 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: From the individual characteristics of the participants it was shown that the majority of them had dark hair and fair skin, whereas a significant percentage reported the existence of moles on face and their body (83.4% vs 68.1%). The sun burn incidence was high in adolescents and the younger pupils (41.9% vs 55.6%). The younger aged children who were living in an urban area had significantly higher rates of sun burn than those living in semi-urban areas (33.8% vs 24.8%, p=0.020). As far as the knowledge of pupils about the risks of sun radiation it was shown that the elementary school pupils had better knowledge than those at high school. Finally, those with better knowledge had the fewer sun burns (Mean 2.83 SD 0.87, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The contribution of knowledge to the decrease of sun burn incidence is important as long as this is continuous. Therefore, the education should concern not only children but also teachers and parents in the context of continuous and systematic programs of health education.


Subject(s)
Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sunburn/epidemiology , Sunlight/adverse effects , Sunscreening Agents/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Schools , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sunburn/etiology , Sunburn/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
BMC Urol ; 14: 78, 2014 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25255740

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore the budget impact of dutasteride plus tamsulosin fixed-dose combination (DUT + TAM FDC) versus tamsulosin monotherapy, in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) from the perspective of the Greek healthcare insurance system. METHODS: A Microsoft Excel-based model was developed to estimate the financial consequences of adopting DUT + TAM FDC within the Greek healthcare setting. The model, compared six mutually exclusive health states in two alternative treatment options: current standard of care and the introduction of DUT + TAM FDC in the market. The model used clinical inputs from the CombAT study; data on resource use associated with the management of BPH in Greece were derived from expert panel, and unit cost data were derived from official reimbursement tariffs. A payer perspective was taken into account. As patient distribution data between public and private sectors are not available in Greece two scenarios were investigated, considering the whole eligible population in each scenario. A 4 year time horizon was taken into account and included treatment costs, number of transurethral resections of the prostate (TURPs) and acute urinary retention (AUR) episodes avoided. RESULTS: The clinical benefit from the market adoption of DUT + TAM FDC in Greece was 1,758 TURPs and 972 episodes of AUR avoided cumulatively in a four year period. The increase in total costs from the gradual introduction of DUT + TAM FDC to the Greek healthcare system ranges from €1.3 million in the first year to €5.8 million in the fourth year, for the public sector, and €1.2 million to €4.0 million, for the private sector. This represents an increase of 1.91% to 7.94% for the public sector and 1.10% 3.29% in the private sector, during the 4-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Budget impact analysis (BIA) results indicated that the gradual introduction of DUT + TAM FDC, would increase the overall budget of the disease, however providing better clinical outcomes. DUT + TAM FDC drug acquisition cost is partly offset by the reduction in the costs associated with the treatment of the disease.


Subject(s)
Azasteroids/economics , Azasteroids/therapeutic use , Budgets , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Sulfonamides/economics , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Urological Agents/economics , Urological Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dutasteride , Greece , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Hyperplasia/surgery , Tamsulosin , Transurethral Resection of Prostate/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Retention/prevention & control
4.
Ann Gen Psychiatry ; 11(1): 18, 2012 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22747533

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients having chronic schizophrenia with frequent relapses and hospitalizations represent a great challenge, both clinically and financially. Risperidone long-acting injection (RIS-LAI) has been the main LAI atypical antipsychotic treatment in Greece. Paliperidone palmitate (PP-LAI) has recently been approved. It is dosed monthly, as opposed to biweekly for RIS-LAI, but such advantages have not yet been analysed in terms of economic evaluation. PURPOSE: To compare costs and outcomes of PP-LAI versus RIS-LAI in Greece. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis was performed using a previously validated decision tree to model clinical pathways and costs over 1 year for stable patients started on either medication. Rates were taken from the literature. A local expert panel provided feedback on treatment patterns. All direct costs incurred by the national healthcare system were obtained from the literature and standard price lists; all were inflated to 2011 costs. Patient outcomes analyzed included average days with stable disease, numbers of hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: The total annual healthcare cost with PP-LAI was €3529; patients experienced 325 days in remission and 0.840 QALY; 28% were hospitalized and 15% received emergency room treatment. With RIS-LAI, the cost was €3695, patients experienced 318.6 days in remission and 0.815 QALY; 33% were hospitalized and 17% received emergency room treatment. Thus, PP-LAI dominated RIS-LAI. Results were generally robust in sensitivity analyses with PP-LAI dominating in 74.6% of simulations. Results were sensitive to the price of PP-LAI. CONCLUSIONS: PP-LAI appears to be a cost-effective option for treating chronic schizophrenia in Greece compared with RIS-LAI since it results in savings to the health care system along with better patient outcomes.

5.
Ann Gen Psychiatry ; 7: 16, 2008 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18755025

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To compare the costs and effects of paliperidone extended release (ER), a new pharmaceutical treatment for the management of schizophrenia, with the most frequently prescribed oral treatments in Greece (namely risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole and ziprasidone) over a 1-year time period. METHODS: A decision tree was developed and tailored to the specific circumstances of the Greek healthcare system. Therapeutic effectiveness was defined as the annual number of stable days and the clinical data was collected from international clinical trials and published sources. The study population was patients who suffer from schizophrenia with acute exacerbation. During a consensus panel of 10 psychiatrists and 6 health economists, data were collected on the clinical practice and medical resource utilisation. Unit costs were derived from public sources and official reimbursement tariffs. For the comparators official retail prices were used. Since a price had not yet been granted for paliperidone ER at the time of the study, the conservative assumption of including the average of the highest targeted European prices was used, overestimating the price of paliperidone ER in Greece. The study was conducted from the perspective of the National Healthcare System. RESULTS: The data indicate that paliperidone ER might offer an increased number of stable days (272.5 compared to 272.2 for olanzapine, 265.5 f risperidone, 260.7 for quetiapine, 260.5 for ziprasidone and 258.6 for aripiprazole) with a lower cost compared to the other therapies examined (euro 7,030 compared to euro 7,034 for olanzapine, euro 7,082 for risperidone, euro 8,321 for quetiapine, euro 7,713 for ziprasidone and euro 7,807 for aripiprazole). During the sensitivity analysis, a +/- 10% change in the duration and frequency of relapses and the economic parameters did not lead to significant changes in the results. CONCLUSION: Treatment with paliperidone ER can lead to lower total cost and higher number of stable days in most of the cases examined.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...