Clinical aspects of oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer: tips and tricks for the novice and the expert.

Oocyte retrieval (ovum pick-up) and embryo transfer (ET) are essential steps in in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection and over the years, the two procedures were developed in order to improve the clinical outcome. Many suggestions were proposed and applied before, during and after oocyte retrieval such as timing of HCG trigger, pre-operative pelvic scan, vaginal cleansing, type of anesthesia, type and gauge of aspiration needles, aspiration pressure, follicle flushing, and the need for prophylactic antibiotics. Similarly, many steps were suggested and implemented before, during and after ET including patient's position, type of anesthesia/analgesia, dummy (mock) ET, ultrasound-guidance, HCG injection in the uterine cavity, use of relaxing agents, full bladder, removal of the cervical mucus, flushing the cervix with culture medium, type of ET catheter, embryo loading techniques, site of embryo deposition, the use of adherence compounds, as well as bed rest after ET. Complications were also reported with oocyte retrieval and ET. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current practice of these two procedures in the light of available evidence.

Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

BACKGROUND: Among subfertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART), pregnancy rates following frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) treatment cycles have historically been found to be lower than following embryo transfer undertaken two to five days following oocyte retrieval. Nevertheless, FET increases the cumulative pregnancy rate, reduces cost, is relatively simple to undertake and can be accomplished in a shorter time period than repeated in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with fresh embryo transfer. FET is performed using different cycle regimens: spontaneous ovulatory (natural) cycles; cycles in which the endometrium is artificially prepared by oestrogen and progesterone hormones, commonly known as hormone therapy (HT) FET cycles; and cycles in which ovulation is induced by drugs (ovulation induction FET cycles). HT can be used with or without a gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). This is an update of a Cochrane review; the first version was published in 2008. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of natural cycle FET, HT cycle FET and ovulation induction cycle FET, and compare subtypes of these regimens. SEARCH METHODS: On 13 December 2016 we searched databases including Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Other search sources were trials registers and reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the various cycle regimens and different methods used to prepare the endometrium during FET. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were live birth rates and miscarriage. MAIN RESULTS: We included 18 RCTs comparing different cycle regimens for FET in 3815 women. The quality of the evidence was low or very low. The main limitations were failure to report important clinical outcomes, poor reporting of study methods and imprecision due to low event rates. We found no data specific to non-ovulatory women. 1. Natural cycle FET comparisons Natural cycle FET versus HT FETNo study reported live birth rates, miscarriage or ongoing pregnancy.There was no evidence of a difference in multiple pregnancy rates between women in natural cycles and those in HT FET cycle (odds ratio (OR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 68.14, 1 RCT, n = 21, very low-quality evidence). Natural cycle FET versus HT plus GnRHa suppressionThere was no evidence of a difference in rates of live birth (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.53, 1 RCT, n = 159, low-quality evidence) or multiple pregnancy (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.50, 1 RCT, n = 159, low-quality evidence) between women who had natural cycle FET and those who had HT FET cycles with GnRHa suppression. No study reported miscarriage or ongoing pregnancy. Natural cycle FET versus modified natural cycle FET (human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) trigger)There was no evidence of a difference in rates of live birth (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.93, 1 RCT, n = 60, very low-quality evidence) or miscarriage (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.13, 1 RCT, n = 168, very low-quality evidence) between women in natural cycles and women in natural cycles with HCG trigger. However, very low-quality evidence suggested that women in natural cycles (without HCG trigger) may have higher ongoing pregnancy rates (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.03 to 5.76, 1 RCT, n = 168). There were no data on multiple pregnancy. 2. Modified natural cycle FET comparisons Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) versus HT FETThere was no evidence of a difference in rates of live birth (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.05, 1 RCT, n = 959, low-quality evidence) or ongoing pregnancy (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.83, 1 RCT, n = 959, low-quality evidence) between women in modified natural cycles and those who received HT. There were no data on miscarriage or multiple pregnancy. Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) versus HT plus GnRHa suppressionThere was no evidence of a difference between the two groups in rates of live birth (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.87, 1 RCT, n = 236, low-quality evidence) or miscarriage (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.19, 1 RCT, n = 236, low-quality evidence) rates. There were no data on ongoing pregnancy or multiple pregnancy. 3. HT FET comparisons HT FET versus HT plus GnRHa suppressionHT alone was associated with a lower live birth rate than HT with GnRHa suppression (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.30, 1 RCT, n = 75, low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in either miscarriage (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.12, 6 RCTs, n = 991, I2 = 0%, low-quality evidence) or ongoing pregnancy (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 4.85, 1 RCT, n = 106, very low-quality evidence).There were no data on multiple pregnancy. 4. Comparison of subtypes of ovulation induction FET Human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) versus clomiphene plus HMG HMG alone was associated with a higher live birth rate than clomiphene combined with HMG (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.07 to 5.80, 1 RCT, n = 209, very low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in either miscarriage (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.35 to 5.09,1 RCT, n = 209, very low-quality evidence) or multiple pregnancy (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.31 to 6.48, 1 RCT, n = 209, very low-quality evidence).There were no data on ongoing pregnancy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review did not find sufficient evidence to support the use of one cycle regimen in preference to another in preparation for FET in subfertile women with regular ovulatory cycles. The most common modalities for FET are natural cycle with or without HCG trigger or endometrial preparation with HT, with or without GnRHa suppression. We identified only four direct comparisons of these two modalities and there was insufficient evidence to support the use of either one in preference to the other.

Definition and epidemiology of unexplained infertility.

The diagnosis of unexplained infertility can be made only after excluding common causes of infertility using standard fertility investigations,which include semen analysis, assessment of ovulation, and tubal patency test. These tests have been selected as they have definitive correlation with pregnancy. It is estimated that a standard fertility evaluation will fail to identify an abnormality in approximately 15% to 30% of infertile couples. The reported incidence of such unexplained infertility varies according to the age and selection criteria in the study population. We conducted a review of the literature via MEDLINE. Articles were limited to English-language, human studies published between 1950 and 2013. Since first coined more than 50 years ago, the term unexplained infertility has been a subject of debate. Although additional investigations are reported to explain or define other causes of infertility, these have high false-positive results and therefore cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice. Couples with unexplained infertility might be reassured that even after 12 months of unsuccessful attempts, 50% will conceive in the following 12 months and another 12% in the year after.

Oocyte vitrification in the 21st century and post-warming fertility outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oocyte cryopreservation is a rapidly developing technology, which is increasingly being used for various medical, legal and social reasons. There are inconsistencies in information regarding survival rate and fertility outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence-based information about oocyte survival and fertility outcomes post warming to help women to make informed choices. All randomized and non-randomized, controlled and prospective cohort studies using oocyte vitrification were included. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate/warmed oocyte. Sensitivity analysis for donor and non-donor oocyte studies was performed. Proportional meta-analysis of 17 studies, using a random-effects model, showed pooled ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates per warmed oocyte of 7%. Oocyte survival, fertilization, cleavage, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates per warmed oocyte were higher in donor versus non-donor studies. Comparing vitrified with fresh oocytes, no statistically significant difference was observed in fertilization, cleavage and clinical pregnancy rates, but ongoing pregnancy rate was reduced in the vitrified group (odds ratio 0.74), with heterogeneity between studies. Considering the age of women and the reason for cryopreservation, reasonable information can be given to help women to make informed choices. Future studies with outcomes from oocytes cryopreserved for gonadotoxic treatment may provide more insight.

Adjunct low-molecular-weight heparin to improve live birth rate after recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND Poor fertility outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failure (≥ RIF) present significant challenges in assisted reproduction, and various adjuncts, including heparin, are used for potential improvement in pregnancy rates. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on live birth rates (LBRs) and implantation rates (IRs) in women with RIF and undergoing IVF. METHODS Studies comparing LMWH versus control/placebo in women with RIF were searched for on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, conference proceedings and databases for registered and ongoing trials (1980-2012). Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.1. The main outcome measure was LBR per woman. RESULTS Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one quasi-randomized trial met the inclusion criteria. One study included women with at least one thrombophilia ( Qublan et al., 2008) and two studies included women with unexplained RIF ( Urman et al., 2009; Berker et al., 2011). Pooled risk ratios in women with ≥ 3 RIF (N = 245) showed a significant improvement in the LBR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10-2.90, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the miscarriage rate (RR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.06-0.78, P = 0.02) with LMWH compared with controls. The IR for ≥ 3 RIF (N = 674) showed a non-significant trend toward improvement (RR = 1.73, 95% CI 0.98-3.03, P = 0.06) with LMWH. However, the beneficial effect of LMWH was not significant when only studies with unexplained RIF were pooled. The summary analysis for the numbers needed to be treated with LMWH showed that approximately eight women would require treatment to achieve one extra live birth. CONCLUSIONS In women with ≥3 RIF, the use of adjunct LMWH significantly improves LBR by 79% compared with the control group; however, this is to be considered with caution, since the overall number of participants in the studies was small. Further evidence from adequately powered multi-centered RCTs is required prior to recommending LMWH for routine clinical use. This review highlights the need for future basic science and clinical research in this important field.

Evidence-based management of endometrioma.

Endometrioma is commonly seen in women of reproductive age who may wish to preserve their ovarian function. Surgical treatment is associated with a high recurrence rate and its employment for women undergoing assisted conception has recently been challenged. Medical treatment has not been shown to be effective in controlling symptoms or improving fertility potential. The results of retrospective and non-randomized studies have been inconsistent and created an ongoing debate between gynaecologists and fertility specialists. This manuscript reviews and critically appraises the evidence for management of endometrioma in women of reproductive age. In asymptomatic women, surgical treatment is usually recommended for women above the age of 40 and for large endometriomas. Except for pelvic clearance, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that surgical treatment of endometrioma is better than medical treatment with respect to the long-term relief of symptoms and quality of life. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma prior to IVF does not offer any additional benefit over expectant management. A large, well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled study that compares the effects of surgical removal versus expectant management of endometrioma on ovarian performance and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF is warranted.

Management of endometrioma prior to IVF: compliance with ESHRE guidelines.

Management of endometrioma before IVF remains controversial. As well as some measurable benefits from surgical treatment, there are also potential risks that should be discussed with the patients to help them make an informed decision. When surgery is compared with expectant management, there appear to be no statistically significant differences in pregnancy rate and ovarian response to exogenous stimulation. The objectives of this European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)-sponsored survey were to acquire knowledge of current strategies for the management of endometrioma (>3 cm) prior to IVF and to explore adherence to ESHRE guidelines. A validated, peer-reviewed online questionnaire made of 14 questions was sent to 396 members of the ESHRE Special Interest Groups (Reproductive Surgery and Endometriosis/Endometrium), with a response rate of 27%. Surgical management is the most common treatment (82.2%), with drainage and excision of the cyst wall being the preferred surgical approach (78.5%). Monthly depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues are the preferred choice of medical treatment of endometriomas before IVF, with an average duration of treatment of 3 months. The findings demonstrate that surgery remains the commonest treatment offered for women with endometrioma before IVF. This is in line with the recommendations of the ESHRE guidelines.

The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is better than antral follicle count (AFC) in predicting oocyte yield and embryo quality after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective observational study involving 162 women (<40 years old) undergoing their first IVF cycle at an IVF unit within a university hospital. AMH and AFC measurements were made on day 3 of the cycle within 3 months of starting ovarian stimulation. A standard long down-regulation protocol using gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone was used. A maximum of two embryos were transferred on day 2 or 3 following oocyte retrieval. The primary outcome was the number of good quality embryos available for transfer and freezing. Embryos were graded according to the number of blastomeres, the difference in blastomere size and the degree of fragmentation, into grades 1-4. Secondary outcomes included the number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized and the live birth rate. Correlation between different parameters was calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for AMH and AFC to compare ability of parameters to predict top quality or frozen embryos and the occurrence of a live birth. RESULTS: Of the 137 women who had fresh embryo transfer, 52 became pregnant (32.1% pregnancy rate per cycle started) and 38 had a live birth (23.5% live birth rate per cycle started). Both AMH and AFC had highly significant correlations with the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of oocytes fertilized (P<0.001). The two markers were also significantly associated with the number of top quality embryos available for transfer and the number of embryos frozen (P<0.01). With regard to live birth, AMH performed better than AFC (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively), but both markers were more valuable in predicting the absence rather than the occurrence of live birth (negative predictive value 84%). CONCLUSIONS: AMH and AFC are comparable predictors of oocytes retrieved and of the number of good quality embryos available for transfer and freezing. Prediction of live birth may help clinicians selecting patients suitable for single embryo transfer.

Short and long-term risks to women who conceive through in vitro fertilization.

There are a number of potential risks to women who conceive through in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Among these, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies are the most serious. Other potential risks include increased levels of anxiety and depression, ovarian torsion, ectopic pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia, placental separation and increased risk of cesarean section. The association between assisted conception and long-term risk of cancer is debatable. The objective of this review is to critically evaluate the current evidence for potential risks to women who conceive through IVF. To assess the relative risk for any condition, a number of factors need to be taken into account including the method used in identifying the study and control group, the women's characteristics and the number of women included in the study. Many conditions such as ectopic pregnancy and pre-eclampsia appear to be commoner in assisted conception than in spontaneous pregnancy. Nevertheless, the increased risk of these conditions is probably related to the woman's subfertility status and/or increased incidence of multiple pregnancy. Currently, all efforts should concentrate on reduction of multiple births from IVF by restricting the number of transferred embryos.

The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a policy of elective single-embryo transfer (e-SET) lowers the multiple birth rate without compromising the live birth rate. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine and IVF unit. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): Searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Meta-register for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCISEARCH with no limitation on language and publication year, 1974 to 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA: randomized, controlled trials comparing e-SET with double-embryo transfer (DET) for live birth and multiple birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Nonrandomized trials and studies that included only patients who had blastocyst transfer were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The likelihood of live birth per patient and multiple birth per total number of live births. Other outcomes included implantation rate, pregnancy rate, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate per patient, and preterm delivery rate per live birth. RESULT(S): Six trials (n=1354 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with DET, the e-SET policy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the probability of live birth (RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72) and multiple birth (RR 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.18). CONCLUSION(S): Elective-SET of embryos at the cleavage stage reduces the likelihood of live birth by 38% and multiple birth by 94%. Evidence from randomized, controlled trials suggests that increasing the number of e-SET attempts (fresh and/or frozen) results in a cumulative live birth rate similar to that of DET. Offering subfertile women three cycles of IVF will have a major impact on the uptake of an e-SET policy.

Symposium: Update on prediction and management of OHSS. Optimal dose of HCG for final oocyte maturation in IVF cycles: absence of evidence?

There is an ongoing debate over the optimal dose of urinary HCG (u-HCG) that can trigger final oocyte maturation, leading to higher IVF success rate without increasing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). A systematic review was conducted of all studies that compared the effect of at least two doses of u-HCG for final oocyte maturation on IVF outcomes and on the incidence of OHSS. The primary outcome was the live birth rate, and the secondary end-points were the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization, implantation and pregnancy rates, and the incidence of OHSS. Only two amongst the six included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT). Meta-analytic pool was not feasible due to insufficient number of studies assessing the same outcome and significant heterogeneity. The majority of studies concluded that the clinical outcomes were similar between women receiving 5000 or 10,000 IU of u-HCG. The incidence of OHSS was not reduced in the high-risk population even with lower dose of u-HCG. Until large scale RCT addressing the clinical effectiveness and the adverse outcomes related to various doses of u-HCG are conducted, the dose of u-HCG for final oocyte maturation for women referred for IVF needs to be individualized.

Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical value of basal anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements compared with other available determinants, apart from chronologic age, in the prediction of ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine and an IVF unit. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing their first cycle of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization (IVF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Basal levels of FSH and AMH as well as antral follicle count (AFC) were measured in 165 subjects. All patients were followed prospectively and their cycle outcomes recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Predictive value of FSH, AMH, and AFC for extremes of ovarian response to stimulation. RESULT(S): Out of the 165 women, 134 were defined as normal responders, 15 as poor responders, and 16 as high responders. Subjects in the poor response group were significantly older then those in the other two groups. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels and AFC were markedly raised in the high responders and decreased in the poor responders. Compared with FSH and AFC, AMH performed better in the prediction of excessive response to ovarian stimulation-AMH area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC(AUC)) 0.81, FSH ROC(AUC) 0.66, AFC ROC(AUC) 0.69. For poor response, AMH (ROC(AUC) 0.88) was a significantly better predictor than FSH (ROC(AUC) 0.63) but not AFC (ROC(AUC) 0.81). AMH prediction of ovarian response was independent of age and PCOS. Anti-Müllerian hormone cutoffs of >3.75 ng/mL and <1.0 ng/mL would have modest sensitivity and specificity in predicting the extremes of response. CONCLUSION(S): Circulating AMH has the ability to predict excessive and poor response to stimulation with exogenous gonadotrophins. Overall, this biomarker is superior to basal FSH and AFC, and has the potential to be incorporated in to work-up protocols to predict patient's ovarian response to treatment and to individualize strategies aiming at reducing the cancellation rate and the iatrogenic complications of COH.

The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of surgical treatment of endometrioma on pregnancy rate and ovarian response to gonadotrophin stimulation in women undergoing IVF. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Subfertile women with endometrioma undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Surgical removal of endometrioma or expectant management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate and ovarian response to gonadotrophins (number of gonadotrophin ampoules, peak E(2) levels, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of embryos available for transfer). RESULT(S): A search of three electronic databases for articles published between January 1985 and November 2007 yielded 20 eligible studies. Meta-analysis was conducted for five studies that compared surgery vs. no treatment of endometrioma. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the treated and the untreated groups. Similarly, no significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to the outcome measures used to assess the response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with gonadotrophins. CONCLUSION(S): Collectively the available data in the literature show that surgical management of endometriomas has no significant effect on IVF pregnancy rates and ovarian response to stimulation compared with no treatment. Randomized controlled trials are needed before producing best-practice recommendations on this topic.

The use of estradiol for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of luteal E(2) supplementation on the pregnancy rate of IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of all the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine and IVF. PATIENT(S): Women undergoing IVF or ICSI using the GnRH agonist or GnRH antagonist protocol with hMG or FSH for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. INTERVENTION(S): Progesterone (P4) alone or combined with estradiol valerate for luteal phase support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates per ET. RESULT(S): An electronic search was conducted targeting all reports published between January 1960 and March 2007. Ten RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to the main outcome measures, ongoing pregnancy rate per ET, or implantation rate between the group of women who had combined E(2) and P4 therapy and those who had P4 supplementation alone. CONCLUSION(S): The addition of E(2) to P4 for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI cycles has no beneficial effect on pregnancy rates. The data in the literature are, however, limited and heterogeneous, precluding the extraction of clear and definite conclusions. A large multicenter, properly designed RCT is needed to further clarify the role of luteal E(2) supplementation in IVF.

The optimal length of 'coasting protocol' in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication following ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). Coasting is the practice whereby the gonadotrophins are withheld and the administration of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is delayed until serum oestradiol (E2) has decreased to what is considered to be a safe level, to prevent the onset of OHSS. This study aimed to assess the length of coasting on the reproductive outcome in women at risk of developing OHSS. Coasting was undertaken when the serum E2 concentrations were > or = 17000 pmol/L but < 21000 pmol/L. Daily E2 measurements were performed and hCG was administered when hormone levels decreased to < 17000 pmol/L. Eighty-one women who had their stimulation cycles coasted were grouped according to the number of coasting days. Severe OHSS occurred in one case, which represented 1.2% of patients who underwent coasting because of an increased risk of developing the syndrome. No difference was found between cycles coasted for 1 - 3 days and cycles coasted for > or = 4 days in terms of oocyte maturity, fertilization and embryo cleavage rates. Women in whom coasting lasted for > or = 4 days had significantly fewer oocytes retrieved (P < 0.05) and decreased implantation rate (P < 0.05) compared to those coasted for 1 - 3 days. Pregnancy rate/embryo transfer and live birth rate did not differ between groups. In conclusion, coasting appears to decrease the risk of OHSS without compromising the IVF cycle pregnancy outcome. Prolonged coasting is, however, associated with reduced implantation rates, perhaps due to the deleterious effects on the endometrium rather than the oocytes.

Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy or the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of prophylactic laparoscopic salpingectomy versus division of the fallopian tubes on ovarian response to gonadotropins in women undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: National Health Service-based tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): One hundred sixty-eight women with tubal factor infertility. Sixty-five women with hydrosalpinges had either salpingectomy (n = 40, group A) or proximal tubal division (n = 25, group B), while the remaining women with tubal disease but without hydrosalpinges acted as the control group (n = 103, group C). INTERVENTION(S): Prophylactic laparoscopic salpingectomy or proximal division of the fallopian tubes and ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins for IVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Day 2 serum FSH levels before surgery and 3 months after surgery but before ovarian stimulation, ovarian response assessed as total dose of hMG administered, serum E2 concentrations on day 3 and day 8 of stimulation and on the day of hCG injection, number of follicles, and number of oocytes retrieved and fertilized. RESULT(S): In group A, baseline FSH levels were significantly raised after surgery compared with before surgery. Postsurgery FSH concentrations were significantly higher in group A compared with group B. The number of follicles (15-20 mm) was significantly lower in group A compared with group B and group C. The serum E2 levels on day 8 of stimulation were lower in group A compared with group B, and on the day of hCG injection it was significantly reduced in group A compared with groups B and C. The number of oocytes retrieved per cycle was significantly lower in group A compared with group B. There were no significant differences in pregnancy rates and miscarriage rates among the three groups. CONCLUSION(S): These findings suggest that prophylactic salpingectomy in women with hydrosalpinx may compromise ovarian response to stimulation without affecting pregnancy rates. A randomized control trial is recommended to determine the most appropriate laparoscopic procedure in the management of hydrosalpinx before IVF.

Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates after the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos (FET) in a natural or hormonal control cycle. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: National Health Service tertiary referral center for reproductive medicine in Manchester, United Kingdom. PATIENT(S): Two comparable groups of women with regular menstrual cycles: Group A (n = 212) had FET in a natural cycle after spontaneous ovulation; group B (n = 205) had FET in a pituitary-desensitized hormonally controlled cycle. INTERVENTION(S): In group B, GnRH agonist was commenced in the midluteal phase of the previous cycle and discontinued 3 days before embryo transfer. Oral estradiol valerate and vaginal progesterone pessary were used to prepare the endometrium. Embryo transfer was carried out 3 days after detection of the endogenous LH surge in group A and on day 3 of progesterone administration in group B. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates per cycle and per embryo transfer (ET). RESULT(S): In the 212 women who had natural-cycle FET, 172 ETs were performed and 247 embryos replaced. The implantation rate was 14.1% (35/247). Twenty clinical pregnancies (20/172, 11.6%) were achieved. In the 205 women who had down-regulated hormone replacement-cycle FET, 173 embryo transfers were performed and 243 embryos replaced. The implantation rate was 13.5% (33/243). Eighteen clinical pregnancies (18/173, 10.2%) were achieved. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the implantation, clinical pregnancy, or live birth rates per cycle or per ET. CONCLUSION(S): These findings suggest that both FET protocols are equally effective in terms of implantation rate and pregnancy outcome in women with regular menstrual cycles.