Benzodiazepines in the Management of Seizures and Status Epilepticus: A Review of Routes of Delivery, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability.

Status epilepticus (SE) is an acute, life-threatening medical condition that requires immediate, effective therapy. Therefore, the acute care of prolonged seizures and SE is a constant challenge for healthcare professionals, in both the pre-hospital and the in-hospital settings. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are the first-line treatment for SE worldwide due to their efficacy, tolerability, and rapid onset of action. Although all BZDs act as allosteric modulators at the inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor, the individual agents have different efficacy profiles and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, some of which differ significantly. The conventional BZDs clonazepam, diazepam, lorazepam and midazolam differ mainly in their durations of action and available routes of administration. In addition to the common intravenous, intramuscular and rectal administrations that have long been established in the acute treatment of SE, other administration routes for BZDs-such as intranasal administration-have been developed in recent years, with some preparations already commercially available. Most recently, the intrapulmonary administration of BZDs via an inhaler has been investigated. This narrative review provides an overview of the current knowledge on the efficacy and tolerability of different BZDs, with a focus on different routes of administration and therapeutic specificities for different patient groups, and offers an outlook on potential future drug developments for the treatment of prolonged seizures and SE.

Exploring Contraindications for Thrombolysis: Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation and Neurological Deterioration after Thrombolysis in Mice with Recent Ischemic Stroke and Hyperglycemia.

(1) Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke is limited because of several contraindications. In routine clinical practice, patients with a recent stroke are typically not treated with rt-PA in case of a recurrent ischemic event. The same applies to its use in the context of pulmonary artery embolism and myocardial infarction with a recent stroke. In this translational study, we evaluated whether rt-PA treatment after experimental ischemic stroke with or without additional hyperglycemia increases the risk for hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and worsens functional outcome regarding the old infarct area. (2) In total, 72 male C57BL/6N mice were used. Ischemic stroke (index stroke) was induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO). Mice received either rt-PA or saline 24 h or 14 days after index stroke to determine whether a recent ischemic stroke predisposes to HT. In addition to otherwise healthy mice, hyperglycemic mice were analyzed to evaluate diabetes as a second risk factor for HT. Mice designated to develop hyperglycemia were pre-treated with streptozotocin. (3) The neurological outcome in rt-PA and saline-treated normoglycemic mice did not differ significantly, either at 24 h or at 14 days. In contrast, hyperglycemic mice treated with rt-PA had a significantly worse neurological outcome (at 24 h, p = 0.02; at 14 days, p = 0.03). At 24 h after rt-PA or saline treatment, HT scores differed significantly (p = 0.02) with the highest scores within hyperglycemic mice treated with rt-PA, where notably only small petechial hemorrhages could be detected. (4) Thrombolysis after recent ischemic stroke does not increase the risk for HT or worsen the functional outcome in otherwise healthy mice. However, hyperglycemia as a second risk factor leads to neurological deterioration after rt-PA treatment, which cannot be explained by an increase of HT alone. Direct neurotoxic effects of rt-PA may play a role.