Escitalopram co-prescription in anastrozole-treated breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of escitalopram co-prescription on plasma anastrozole levels in post-menopausal breast cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 24 post-menopausal operated breast cancer patients co-prescribed with escitalopram and anastrozole were included. Blood samples were collected, before and 1-month after the onset of escitalopram to analyze plasma anastrozole and estradiol levels. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted in basal plasma anastrozole levels with respect to age, body mass index (BMI), tumor stage, previous antineoplastic treatments, concomitant medications, and serum estradiol levels. Overall, 17 patients completed the 1-month escitalopram treatment, while 7 patients discontinued escitalopram within the 1st week of the treatment. Basal anastrozole levels of 24 patients were 26.1±2.4 ng/mL. Among 17 patients who continued 1-month escitalopram treatment was associated with significant increase in plasma anastrozole levels (24.5±2.3 ng/mL to 32.2±3.2 ng/mL, p<0.05). Notably, 1-month escitalopram use was associated with significant increase in plasma anastrozole levels only in the subgroup of obese (BMI >29 kg/m2) patients (23.1±2.8 to 35.9±4.7 ng/mL, p<0.01), while no such interaction was noted among non-obese patients. The estradiol levels of the patients were below ≤10 pg/mL in 75% of patients and no change occurred after escitalopram administration. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram co-prescription resulted in significant increase in plasma anastrozole levels without affecting the serum estradiol levels. Our findings emphasize the need for close monitoring in case of concomitant use of anastrozole and escitalopram, especially in obese patients and the potential role of therapeutic drug monitoring.

CT Derived Hounsfield Unit: An Easy Way to Determine Osteoporosis and Radiation Related Fracture Risk in Irradiated Patients.

Background: We aimed to evaluate osteoporosis, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in irradiated patients by computerized tomography derived Hounsfield Units (HUs) calculated from radiation treatment planning system. Methods: Fifty-seven patients operated for gastric adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant abdominal radiotherapy were included in the study group. Thirty-four patients who were not irradiated after surgery comprised the control group. HUs of T12, L1, L2 vertebral bodies were measured from the computerized tomographies imported to the treatment planning system for all the patients. While the measurements were obtained just after surgery and 1 year later after surgery in the control group, the same measurements were obtained just before irradiation and 1 year after radiotherapy in the study group. Percent change in HU values (Δ%HU) was determined for each group. Vertebral compression fractures, which are the consequence of radiation induced osteoporosis and bone toxicity were assessed during follow-up. Results: There was no statistical significant difference in HU values measured for all the vertebrae between the study and the control group at the onset of the study. While HU values decreased significantly in the study group, there was no significant reduction in HU values in the control group after 1 year. significant correlation was found between Δ%HU and the radiation dose received by each vertebra. Insufficiency fractures (IFs) were observed only in the irradiated patients (4 out of 57 patients) with the cumulative incidence of 7%. Conclusions: HU values are very valuable in determining bone mineral density and fracture risk. Radiation treatment planning system can be utilized to determine HU values. IFs are common after abdominal radiotherapy in patients with low vertebral HU values detected during radiation treatment planning. Radiation dose to the vertebral bones with low HU values should be limited below 20 Gy to prevent late radiation related bone toxicity.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Valid Salvage Treatment Option.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease. Recurrence is inevitable despite initial surgery and postoperative temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy. Salvage surgery is the standard treatment in selected patients. Chemotherapy, biological agents, and re-irradiation are other treatment approaches available. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is nowadays a common treatment as a salvage treatment option. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the files of 132 GBM cases treated between 2010 and 2018. All patients received TMZ and radiotherapy after surgery or biopsy. Among the patients who had recurrence, we identified 42 cases treated with salvage SRT. The CyberKnife robotic system was used to administer SRT. RESULTS: While the median follow-up time for all patients was 16 months (range 1-123), the median follow-up time for patients treated with SRT after initial diagnosis was 26.5 months (range 9-123). The median follow-up time after SRT was 10 months (range 2-107). SRT was performed in a median of 3 fractions (range 2-5). The median prescription dose was 20 Gy (range 18-30). While the median actuarial survival after initial diagnosis for patients treated with salvage SRT was 30 months (range 9-123), it was only 14 months (range 1-111) for patients who could not be treated with salvage SRT (p = 0.001). The median survival time after SRT was 12 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 48 and 9%, respectively. The time to progression after SRT was 5 months (range 1-62), and 6-month and 1-year progression-free survival rates were 50 and 22%, respectively. Patients with longer time to recurrence >12 months had longer overall survival with respect to the ones having recurrence <12 months (p < 0.001). Salvage surgery had been performed in 7 out of 42 patients before SRT. These reoperated patients had significantly worse survival after SRT when compared to the patients who underwent SRT alone (p = 0.02). SRT was well tolerated and there was no grade III/IV toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SRT is a viable salvage treatment option for recurrent GBM. SRT provides acceptable local control and survival benefit for recurrent GBM cases. SRT can be considered especially in patients with long time to recurrence.

Pretreatment SUVmax value to predict outcome in patients with stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Stage III disease accounts for approximately one-fourth of all non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients who are not candidates for curative resection are offered concomitant chemoradiotherapy. In this subgroup, which is difficult to manage, studies that address the role of PET-CT to predict outcome measures specifically for stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy may help better risk stratification. This study aimed to assess whether baseline PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) value in stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would independently identify patients with high risk of progression and death. METHODS: The study population consisted of patients aged 18 years or more with unresectable stage III histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From 2007 to 2014, medical records of patients admitted to our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment PET-CT SUVmax values were recorded for each patient. These values were categorized as low or high according to the median SUVmax measure of the study population. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23 months (range 6-109). The PET-CT SUVmax values ranged from 3.5 to 46 with a median value of 14. The median overall survival was 25 months in SUVmax <14 and 18 months in SUVmax ≥14 group (p=0.023). The median progression-free survival was 16 months in SUVmax <14 and 11 months in SUVmax ≥14 group (p=0.033). Multivariate analysis revealed that both PET-CT SUVmax value (p<0.001) and age (p=0.016) were independent significant predictors for overall survival (OS). CONCLUSION: The results of this study involving patients with stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy provide evidence that suggests that high values of pretreatment SUVmax, an indicator of metabolic tumor burden, predicted a higher risk of disease progression and death.

Volumetric decrease of pancreas after abdominal irradiation, it is time to consider pancreas as an organ at risk for radiotherapy planning.

BACKGROUND: Volumetric shrinkage of normal tissues such as salivary glands, kidneys, hippocampus are observed after radiotherapy. We aimed to assess the alterations in pancreatic volume of patients who received abdominal radiotherapy and define pancreas as an organ at risk for radiation treatment planning. MATERIAL-METHODS: Forty-nine patients operated for gastric adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant abdominal radiotherapy were in the study group, 27 patients with early stage disease who did not need adjuvant treatment after surgery comprised the control group. An experienced radiologist contoured the pancreas of all the patients from computed tomographies imported to the planning system obtained either for radiation planning purpose or for follow-up after surgery. The same procedure was repeated one year later for both groups. Measured volume of the pancreas was expressed in cm3. RESULTS: Mean pancreatic volumes were similar in both groups at the onset of the study, 51,34 ± 20,33 cm3, and 50,12 ± 23,75 cm3 in the irradiated and the control groups respectively (p = 0,63). One year later, mean pancreatic volumes were significantly decreased in each group; 22,48 ± 10,53 cm3, 44,18 ± 23,08 cm3 respectively, p < 0,001. However, the decrease in pancreatic volume was significantly more pronounced in the irradiated group in comparison to the control group, p < 0,001. CONCLUSION: Volumetric decrease in normal tissues after radiotherapy is responsible for loss of organ function and radiation related late side effects. Although pancreas is a radiation sensitive organ losing its volume and function after radiation exposure, it is not yet considered as an organ at risk for radiation treatment planning. Pancreas should be contoured as an organ at risk, dose-volume histogram for the organ should be created, and safe organ doses should be determined. This is the first study declaring pancreas as an organ at risk for radiation toxicity and the necessity of defining dose constraints for the organ.

Osteoporosis development and vertebral fractures after abdominal irradiation in patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Decrease in bone mineral density, osteoporosis development, bone toxicity and resulting insufficiency fractures as late effect of radiotherapy are not well known. Osteoporosis development related to radiotherapy has not been investigated properly and insufficiency fractures are rarely reported for vertebral bones. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were evaluated for adjuvant treatment after surgery. While 73 out of 97 patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy comprised the study group, 24 out of 97 patients with early stage disease without need of adjuvant treatment comprised the control group. Bone mineral densities (BMD) of lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry after surgery, and one year later in both groups. RESULTS: There was statistically significant decline in BMDs after one year in each group itself, however the decline in BMDs of the patients in the irradiated group was more pronounced when compared with the patients in the control group; p values were 0.02 for the decline in BMDs of lumbar spine, and 0.01 for femoral neck respectively. Insufficiency fractures were observed only in the irradiated patients (7 out of 73 patients) with a cumulative incidence of 9.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal irradiation as in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer results in decrease in BMD and osteoporosis. Insufficiency fracture risk in the radiation exposed vertabral bones is increased. Calcium and vitamin D replacement and other measures for prevention of osteoporosis and insufficiency fractures should be considered after abdominal irradiation.

Radiation field size and dose determine oncologic outcome in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrence is a major problem in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Approximately half of the patients fail locoregionally. We analyzed the impact of enlarged radiation field size and higher radiation dose incorporated to chemoradiotherapy on oncologic outcome. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive patients with histologically proven nonmetastatic squamous or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were included in this retrospective analysis. All patients were locally advanced cT3-T4 and/or cN0-1. Treatment consisted of either definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy (Def-CRT) (n = 49, 66 %) or preoperative concomitant chemoradiotherapy (Pre-CRT) followed by surgical resection (n = 25, 34 %). Patients were treated with longer radiation fields. Clinical target volume (CTV) was obtained by giving 8-10 cm margins to the craniocaudal borders of gross tumor volume (GTV) instead of 4-5 cm globally accepted margins, and some patients in Def-CRT group received radiation doses higher than 50 Gy. RESULTS: Isolated locoregional recurrences were observed in 9 out of 49 patients (18 %) in the Def-CRT group and in 1 out of 25 patients (3.8 %) in the Pre-CRT group (p = 0.15). The 5-year survival rate was 59 % in the Def-CRT group and 50 % in the Pre-CRT group (p = 0.72). Radiation dose was important in the Def-CRT group. Patients treated with >50 Gy (11 out of 49 patients) had better survival with respect to patients treated with 50 Gy (38 out of 49 patients). Five-year survivals were 91 and 50 %, respectively (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation treatment planning by enlarged radiation fields in esophageal cancer decreases locoregional recurrences considerably with respect to the results reported in the literature by standard radiation fields (18 vs >50 %). Radiation dose is as important as radiation field size; patients in the Def-CRT group treated with ≥50 Gy had better survival in comparison to patients treated with 50 Gy.

Is there any role of intravenous iron for the treatment of anemia in cancer?

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a major cause of morbidity in patients with cancer resulting in poor physical performance, prognosis and therapy outcome. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of intravenous (iv) iron administration for the correction of anemia, for the prevention of exacerbation of anemia, for decreasing blood transfusion rates, and for the survival of cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with different solid tumor diagnosis who received iv iron during their cancer treatment were evaluated retrospectively. Sixty-three patients with hemoglobin (Hgb) levels between ≥ 9 g/dL, and ≤ 10 g/dL, and no urgent need for red blood cell transfusion were included in this retrospective analysis. The aim of cancer treatment was palliative for metastatic patients (36 out of 63), or adjuvant or curative for patients with localized disease (27 out of 63). All the patients received 100 mg of iron sucrose which was delivered intravenously in 100 mL of saline solution, infused within 30 min, 5 infusions every other day. Complete blood count, serum iron, and ferritin levels before and at every 1 to 3 months subsequently after iv iron administration were followed regularly. RESULTS: Initial mean serum Hgb, serum ferritin and serum iron levels were 9.33 g/dL, 156 ng/mL, and 35.9 µg/dL respectively. Mean Hgb, ferritin, and iron levels 1 to 3 months, and 6 to 12 months after iv iron administration were 10.4 g/dL, 11.2 g/dL, 298.6 ng/mL, 296.7 ng/mL, and 71.6 µg/dL, 67.7 µg/dL respectively with a statistically significant increase in the levels (p < 0.001). Nineteen patients (30 %) however had further decrease in Hgb levels despite iv iron administration, and blood transfusion was necessary in 18 of these 19 patients (28.5 %). The 1-year overall survival rates differed in metastatic cancer patients depending on their response to iv iron; 61.1 % in responders versus 35.3 % in non-responders, (p = 0.005), furthermore response to iv iron correlated with tumor response to cancer treatment, and this relation was statistically significant, (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Iv iron administration in cancer patients undergoing active oncologic treatment is an effective and safe measure for correction of anemia, and prevention of worsening of anemia. Amelioration of anemia and increase in Hgb levels with iv iron administration in patients with disseminated cancer is associated with increased tumor response to oncologic treatment and overall survival. Response to iv iron may be both a prognostic and a predictive factor for response to cancer treatment and survival.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different chemotherapy regimens delivered with concomitant radiotherapy in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Concomitant administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is currently recognized as the standard of treatment in locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicities of three different chemotherapy regimens delivered concurrently with radiotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who received the PE (cisplatin, 50 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 plus etoposide, 50 mg/m(2), on days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33), PD (docetaxel, 20 mg/m(2), on day 1 plus cisplatin, 20 mg/m(2), on day 1, every week), and PC (carboplatin, AUC 2 plus paclitaxel, 45 mg/m(2), on day 1, every week) regimens concurrently with radiotherapy. A total of 227 patients were evaluated in the study. Median follow-up time was 13 months (2-101). There were 27 females (11.9 %) and 200 males (88.1 %) with a median age of 61 (38-82) years. The PD group had higher rates of esophagitis, mucositis, and anemia (p < 0.05). The PC group had higher rates of neuropathy (p = 0.000). The progression-free survival (PFS) time was 10 months for patients in the PC group, 15 months for patients in the PD group, and 21 months for the PE group (p = 0.010). Patients in the PC group had a median overall survival time of 23 months, those in the PD group 27 months, and those in the PE group 36 months (p = 0.098). Combination of cisplatin-etoposide with radiotherapy led to a more favorable outcome compared with the other two regimens. It shows generally manageable toxicity profile and compliance to treatment is noticeable.

Whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases: detrimental or beneficial?

Stereotactic radiosurgery is frequently used, either alone or together with whole-brain radiation therapy to treat brain metastases from solid tumors. Certain experts and radiation oncology groups have proposed replacing whole-brain radiation therapy with stereotactic radiosurgery alone for the management of brain metastases. Although randomized trials have favored adding whole-brain radiation therapy to stereotactic radiosurgery for most end points, a recent meta-analysis demonstrated a survival disadvantage for patients treated with whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery compared with patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery alone. However the apparent detrimental effect of adding whole-brain radiation therapy to stereotactic radiosurgery reported in this meta-analysis may be the result of inhomogeneous distribution of the patients with respect to tumor histologies, molecular histologic subtypes, and extracranial tumor stages between the groups rather than a real effect. Unfortunately, soon after this meta-analysis was published, even as an abstract, use of whole-brain radiation therapy in managing brain metastases has become controversial among radiation oncologists. The American Society of Radiation Oncology recently recommended, in their "Choose Wisely" campaign, against routinely adding whole-brain radiation therapy to stereotactic radiosurgery to treat brain metastases. However, this situation creates conflict for radiation oncologists who believe that there are enough high level of evidence for the effectiveness of whole-brain radiation therapy in the treatment of brain metastases.

Survival in gastric cancer in relation to postoperative adjuvant therapy and determinants.

AIM: To evaluate survival data in patients with gastric cancer in relation to postoperative adjuvant therapy and survival determinants METHODS: A total of 201 patients (mean±SD age: 56.0±11.9 years, 69.7% were males) with gastric carcinoma who were operated and followed up at Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital between 1998 and 2010 were included in this retrospective study. Follow up was evaluated divided into two consecutive periods (before 2008 and 2008-2010, respectively) based on introduction of 3-D conformal technique in radiotherapy at our clinic in 2008. Data on patient demographics, clinical and histopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma and the type of treatment applied after surgery [postoperative adjuvant treatment protocols including chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT), supportive therapy or follow up without any treatment] were recorded. The median duration and determinants of local recurrence free (LRF) survival, distant metastasis free (DMF) survival and overall survival were evaluated in the overall population as well as with respect to follow up years [1998-2008 (n=127) vs 2008-2010 (n=74)]. RESULTS: Median duration for LRF survival, DMF survival and overall survival were 31.9, 24.1 and 31.9 mo, respectively in patients with postoperative adjuvant CRT. No significant difference was noted in median duration for LRF survival, DMF survival and overall survival with respect to treatment protocols in the overall population and also with respect to followed up periods. In the overall population, CT protocols FUFA [5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2) and leucovorin-folinic acid (FA, 20 mg/m2)] (29.9 mo) and UFT®+Antrex® [a fixed combination of the oral FU prodrug tegafur (flouroprymidine, FT, 300 mg/m2 per day) with FA (Antrex®), 15 mg tablet, two times a day] (42.5 mo) was significantly associated with longer LRF survival times than other CT protocols (P=0.036), while no difference was noted between CT protocols in terms of DMF survival and overall survival. Among patients received CRT, overall survival was significantly longer in patients with negative than positive surgical margin (27.7 mo vs 22.4 mo, P=0.016) in the overall study population, while time of radiotherapy initiation had no significant impact on survival times. Nodal stage was determined to be independent predictor of LRF survival in the overall study population with 4.959 fold (P=0.042) increase in mortality in patients with nodal stage N2 compared to patients with nodal stage N0, and independent predictor of overall survival with 5.132 fold (P=0.006), 5.263 fold (P=0.027) and 4.056 fold (P=0.009) increase in the mortality in patients with nodal stage N3a (before 2008), N3b (before 2008) and N2 (overall study population) when compared to patients with N0 stage, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the likelihood of postoperative adjuvant CRT to have a survival benefit in patients with resectable gastric carcinoma.

A cross-sectional survey of the diagnosis and management of bone metastasis in breast cancer patients in Turkey.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the practice of managing breast cancer with bone metastasis in Turkey and to determine the adherence to the British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO) guidelines. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional epidemiological survey was conducted in 38 centers across Turkey. Data from 1,026 breast cancer patients with bone metastases (mean age 54.0 ± 11.9 years) were analyzed. RESULTS: Over 30 % of patients had a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (stage IV) at the time of primary diagnosis. The imaging modalities used for diagnosing bone metastases were bone scintigraphy (57.8 %), radiography (22.8 %), and bone survey (4.4 %). Tumor markers were detected in 94.9 %, and markers of bone metabolism were measured in 90.4 % of patients. A total of 3.5 % of patients underwent surgery for bone metastasis, 26.4 % underwent palliative chemotherapy (most commonly docetaxel + capecitabine), and 56.5 % endured radiotherapy. Most patients (96 %) also received bisphosphonate. Radiography, bone scintigraphy, and CT were the main imaging tools used for postoperative follow-up of bone metastasis. Our results were >95 % in line with the BASO guidelines for the management of bone metastasis, except that interventional procedures, such as biopsy, were applied less frequently in our survey. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis and management practices of breast cancer with bone metastasis in Turkey were generally compatible with international guidelines. However, the awareness and knowledge of physicians on the current guidelines should be increased, and equipment for the appropriate interventional procedures should be provided in every clinic to obtain optimal and standard management of bone metastases.

Risk of endocrine pancreatic insufficiency in patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiation for resected gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy combined with 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy has become the new standard after curative resection in high risk gastric cancer. Beside many complications due to surgery, the addition of chemotherapy and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment may lead to both acute and late toxicities. Pancreatic tissue irradiation during this adjuvant treatment because of incidental and unavoidable inclusion of the organ within the radiation field may affect exocrine and endocrine functions of the organ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were evaluated for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after surgery. While 37 out of 53 patients were treated postoperatively due to either serosal or adjacent organ or lymph node involvement, 16 patients without these risk factors were followed up regularly without any additional treatment and they served as the control group. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c), insulin and C-peptide levels were measured in the control and study groups after the surgery and 6 months and 1 year later. RESULTS: At the baseline there was no difference in FBG, HbA1c, C-peptide and insulin levels between the control and the study groups. At the end of the study there was a statistically significant decline in insulin and C-peptide levels in the study group, (7.5 ± 6.0 vs 4.5 ± 4.4 IU/L, p: 0.002 and 2.3 ± 0.9 vs 1.56 ± 0.9 ng/ml, p: 0.001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant radiotherapy in gastric cancer leads to a decrease in beta cell function and insulin secretion capacity of the pancreas with possible diabetes risk. Radiation-induced pancreatic injury and late effects of radiation on normal pancreatic tissue are unknown, but pancreas is more sensitive to radiation than known. This organ should be studied extensively in order to determine the tolerance doses and it should be contoured during abdominal radiotherapy planning as an organ at risk.

Co-existence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with other primary neoplasms.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common primary mesenchymal neoplasms of the tubular gastrointestinal tract (GI). Here, we present a series of 32 patients diagnosed with a primary neoplasm in addition to GIST, from six different institutions in Turkey. METHODOLOGY: In total, 200 patients with GIST were evaluated; 32 patients with both GISTs and other primary malignancies were identified. RESULTS: This study included 20 men and 12 women median age 66.5 years (range 43-78). GIST was incidentally found intra-operatively in 12 of the cases. All patients underwent surgery. Detection of the GIST was synchronous in 19 cases, metachronous in 7 cases and preceded the GIST diagnosis in 6 cases. The median time before follow-up evaluation ranged from 4 to 80 months. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, no cases of GISTs co-existing with leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord and larynx tumors have been reported previously. The prevalence of malignancies in this subpopulation of GIST patients is significantly higher than the prevalence of malignancies in the healthy Turkish population. The high occurrence rate of additional primary malignancies in GIST patients has focused the attention of clinical oncologists on this problem, and may imply a common genetic mechanism for their etiology.

Lhermitte's sign: Review with special emphasis in oncology practice.

Lhermitte's sign (LS) is characterized by electric shock like sensation, spreading along the spine in a cervico-caudal direction and also into both arms and legs, which is felt upon forward flexion of the neck. It is a myelopathy resulting from damage to sensory axons at the dorsal columns of the cervical or thoracic spinal cord and a well-known clinical sign in neurology practice. Patients with cancer may present with LS due to various causes either related to the tumor itself or to its treatment. Spinal cord tumors, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are possible causes of LS observed in oncology practice. While LS is observed with a frequency of 3.6-13% in large patient groups receiving radiotherapy for head and neck and thoracic malignancies, the true incidence of chemotherapy and spinal cord tumor induced LS is unknown with only few reported cases in the literature. In the present article, various pathologies causing Lhermitte's sign are reviewed with special emphasis on the implications of this sign in oncology practice.