Clinical Outcomes of Transscleral-Sutured Intraocular Lens Combined With Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to report clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) combined with transscleral-sutured intraocular lens (IOL) compared with DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and posterior chamber IOL (Phaco-DMEK). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent DMEK combined with transscleral-sutured intraocular lens fixation or combined with phacoemulsification for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy from 2016 to 2021 at the Toronto Western Hospital or the Kensington Eye Institute (Toronto, ON, Canada) and had at least 18 months of follow-up was performed. Main outcomes were postoperative distance-corrected visual acuity, rebubbling rate, graft survival rate, and complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one cases of DMEK combined with transscleral-sutured IOL (DMEK-TSS-IOL) and 44 cases of Phaco-DMEK were evaluated. Twelve eyes (57.15%) had a foldable acrylic 3-piece IOL (AR40E) and 9 (42.85%) had a single-piece polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOL (CZ70BD). LogMAR distance-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 1.48 ± 0.62 (SD) to 0.86 ± 0.82 ( P = 0.01) 12 months after DMEK-TSS-IOL and from 0.41 ± 0.29 logMAR to 0.11 ± 0.11 logMAR ( P < 0.0001) after Phaco-DMEK. No statistically significant differences were observed in donor ( P = 0.97) or 1-year postoperative endothelial cell density ( P = 0.11) between the groups. Rebubbling was necessary in 33.33% of eyes in DMEK-TSS-IOL compared with 25% of Phaco-DMEK eyes ( P = 0.55). Graft survival rate was 76.19% in the DMEK-TSS-IOL group compared with 90.90% in the Phaco-DMEK group ( P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Transscleral-sutured IOL combined with DMEK is an option for the management of endothelial diseases in aphakic eyes or those which require IOL exchange for the experienced surgeon. However, when compared with routine Phaco-DMEK, there are higher complication and lower survival rates at 18 months.

Five-Year Safety and Efficacy of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate 5-year safety and efficacy outcomes of femtosecond-enabled Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (F-DMEK) in patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED). METHODS: This was a retrospective study, including patients with FED and cataract who underwent either F-DMEK (16 eyes of 15 patients) or manual DMEK (M-DMEK) (42 eyes of 37 patients) combined with cataract extraction. Outcome measures included visual acuity, graft detachment, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. RESULTS: The average follow-up in F-DMEK and M-DMEK was 57.1 ± 12.4 months and 58.5 ± 17.3 months, respectively ( P = 0.757). The rates of primary failure (0% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.567), secondary failure (0% for both), and graft rejection (0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.533) did not differ significantly between the groups. Improvement in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was similar in F-DMEK and M-DMEK (0.32 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution and 0.35 ± 0.44 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, respectively, P = 0.165) and persisted at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years and at the last follow-up. The rates of graft detachment and rebubbling were significantly lower with 6.25% in F-DMEK and 33.3% in M-DMEK ( P = 0.035). Cell-loss rates were lower in F-DMEK compared with M-DMEK throughout the follow-up, significantly so up to 2 years with a difference of 8.6% at 1 year ( P = 0.023), 11.8% at 2 years ( P = 0.021), 7.6% at 3 years ( P = 0.088), 5.8% at 4 years ( P = 0.256), 13.6% at 5 years ( P = 0.169), and 7.1% at the final follow-up ( P = 0.341). CONCLUSIONS: F-DMEK had an excellent safety and efficacy profile which was maintained over 5 years of follow-up. Lower endothelial cell-loss rates in F-DMEK compared with M-DMEK may help extend the duration of graft survival.

Ocular surface squamous neoplasia in a patient following oral steroids for contralateral necrotising scleritis.

A male patient in his 70s presented with left eye necrotising scleritis. His ocular history was significant for pterygium excision with mitomycin C 3 months prior in the affected eye, open-angle glaucoma, nuclear sclerosis cataract and previous sixth cranial nerve palsy. Scleral culture was negative and blood work was positive for rheumatoid factor and HLA-B27. The patient was treated for necrotising scleritis with oral doxycycline, vitamin C, ranitidine and prednisone with gradual taper over 45 days. Two months after initiating treatment, his necrotising scleritis achieved complete resolution; however, a new-onset ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) was identified at the temporal limbus of the contralateral eye. He was treated with topical interferon alpha-2b 1 million IU qid and achieved complete resolution after 4 months. The case highlights both the acute precipitation of OSSN following oral steroids and a sight-threatening complication following pterygium excision.

KAMRA presbyopic inlay refractive outcomes: a Canadian perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the visual outcomes of KAMRA (AcuFocus Inc, Irvine, Calif.) inlay insertion in a cohort of patients reporting success of procedure, complications, patient satisfaction, and refractive outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective trial at the TLC Laser Centre, Toronto. METHODS: A total of 5 surgeons at the practice inserted 35 KAMRA inlays in 35 patients between October 2012 and June 2014. Some patients had a sole KAMRA inlay insertion, whereas others had combined laser vision correction (LVC) and KAMRA inlay on either the same day or sequentially. There was a small cohort of patients who had previous unrelated LVC. Mean time of follow-up was 299 days. RESULTS: After KAMRA inlay insertion there was a significant improvement in uncorrected near visual acuity (p = 0.00009), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (p = 0.00006), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (p = 0.02), but levels of patient dissatisfaction were 43%. The most common cause for dissatisfaction was requirements for readers (23%), followed by dysphotopsias (11%). The explantation rate was 11.42%, and 28.5% of patients required enhancements after inlay insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The KAMRA corneal inlay has significant improvements in uncorrected near visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, and uncorrected distance visual acuity when used in isolation or combined with LVC. Appropriate patient selection is crucial. This procedure should not be used as first-line presbyopia management because of low levels of patient satisfaction, biocompatibility concerns, and explantation rates.