Acceptability of Single-dose Clindamycin Gel for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the acceptability of a single-dose bioadhesive 2% clindamycin vaginal gel for bacterial vaginosis (BV). METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study compared a new clindamycin gel with placebo gel (2:1 ratio). The primary objective was efficacy; secondary objectives were safety and acceptability. Subjects were evaluated at screening, days 7 to 14 (Day 7-14), and days 21 to 30 (test-of-cure [TOC]). An acceptability questionnaire with 9 questions was administered at the Day 7-14 visit, and a subset of questions (#7-#9) was asked again at the TOC visit. At Visit 1, subjects were provided with a daily electronic diary (e-Diary) to collect information regarding study drug administration, vaginal discharge, odor, itching, and any other treatments used. Study site staff reviewed e-Diaries at the Day 7-14 and TOC visits. FINDINGS: A total of 307 women with BV were randomized to treatment (204 to the clindamycin gel group and 103 to the placebo gel group). Most (88.3%) reported at least one previously diagnosed BV episode, and more than one half (55.4%) had experience with other vaginal treatments for BV. At the TOC visit, almost all (91.1%) of the clindamycin gel subjects described their overall experience with the study drug as "satisfied" or "very satisfied," 95.8% indicated that they would be "likely" or "very likely" to use the product again if it became available after the study and they had BV again, and 93.7% would be "likely" or "very likely" to recommend their treatment to a friend who had BV. Almost all (90.2%) clindamycin-treated subjects responded that application was "clean" or "fairly clean," as opposed to "neither clean nor messy," "fairly messy," or "messy." Although 55.4% experienced leakage in the days after application, only 26.9% of those indicated that it was bothersome. Subjects receiving clindamycin gel also reported improvement in both odor and discharge, commencing shortly after dosing and continuing through the assessment period, regardless of whether they met the critical cure criteria. IMPLICATIONS: A single dose of a new bioadhesive 2% clindamycin vaginal gel showed rapid resolution of symptoms and was highly acceptable as a treatment for bacterial vaginosis. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04370548.

Single-Dose, Bioadhesive Clindamycin 2% Gel for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy and safety of a single-dose vaginal clindamycin gel for bacterial vaginosis treatment. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study comparing clindamycin gel with placebo (2:1 ratio). Entry required clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, that is, all four Amsel's criteria, without other genital infections. Nugent scores of 7-10 were required for efficacy assessment, per updated 2019 U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance. Patients were evaluated at screening, day 7-14, and day 21-30 (test of cure). Clinical cure was defined as resolution of three of four Amsel's criteria. Bacteriologic cure was defined as Nugent score lower than 4. Therapeutic cure was both clinical and bacteriologic cure. Primary outcome was clinical cure at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary endpoints were clinical cure at day 7-14, and bacteriologic and therapeutic cures at day 7-14 and test of cure. A sample size of 188 patients in the clindamycin group compared with 94 patients in the placebo group had 90% power to detect statistically significant difference (P=.05, 2-tailed). RESULTS: Participants were seen between July 9, 2020, and November 12, 2020. Of 307 randomized women, 56.0% were Black and 88.3% reported one or more previous bacterial vaginosis episodes. In the modified intention-to-treat population, 70.5% of patients in the clindamycin group and 35.6% in the placebo group achieved clinical cure at test of cure (primary outcome) (difference of 34.9, 95% CI 19.0-50.8), as did 77.5% of patients in the clindamycin group and 42.6% of patients in the placebo group in the per-protocol population (difference of 34.9, 95% CI 17.0-52.7). Statistically significant differences between groups were seen for all secondary endpoints. Clinical cure rate in patients in the clindamycin group with more than three bacterial vaginosis episodes in the prior year was 70.0%. Approximately 15% (15.3%) of patients in the clindamycin group experienced one or more treatment-emergent adverse events related to study treatment, as did 9.7% of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse event was vulvovaginal candidiasis. CONCLUSION: A new, single-dose clindamycin vaginal gel was highly effective, with excellent safety, in women disproportionately affected by bacterial vaginosis, with Nugent scores of 7-10 at study entry. FUNDING SOURCE: The study was funded by Daré Bioscience, Inc. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04370548.

A famciclovir + celecoxib combination treatment is safe and efficacious in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: Infections and other stressors have been implicated in the development of fibromyalgia. We hypothesized that these stressors could result in recurrent reactivations of latent herpes virus infections, which could lead to the development of fibromyalgia. This study evaluated a famciclovir + celecoxib drug combination (IMC-1), active against suspected herpes virus reactivation and infection, for the treatment of fibromyalgia. METHODS: A total of 143 fibromyalgia patients were enrolled at 12 sites in a 16-week, double-blinded, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept trial. Randomized patients received either IMC-1 or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Outcome measures included a 24-hour recall pain Numerical Rating Scale, the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ-R), the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), and the Beck Depression Inventory-II conducted at baseline and weeks 6, 12, and 16 of the study. RESULTS: A significant decrease in fibromyalgia-related pain was observed for patients on IMC-1 treatment versus placebo. PGIC response rates were significantly improved with IMC-1 treatment. Overall, patient self-reported functioning, as measured by the FIQ-R, was significantly improved. Fatigue was also significantly improved as measured by the PROMIS fatigue inventory. The safety profile was encouraging. Despite the celecoxib component of IMC-1, gastrointestinal and nervous system treatment emergent adverse events were reported less frequently in the IMC-1 group, and study completion rates favored IMC-1 treatment. CONCLUSION: IMC-1 was efficacious and safe in treating symptoms of fibromyalgia, supporting the hypothesis that herpes virus infections may contribute to this syndrome. Improved retention rates, decreased adverse event rates, and evidence of efficacy on a broad spectrum of outcome measures are suggestive that IMC-1 may represent an effective, novel treatment for fibromyalgia.

Efficacy and safety of milnacipran 100 mg/day in patients with fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of milnacipran at a dosage of 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily) for monotherapy treatment of fibromyalgia. METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed to assess 1,025 patients with fibromyalgia who were randomized to receive milnacipran 100 mg/day (n = 516) or placebo (n = 509). Patients underwent 4-6 weeks of flexible dose escalation followed by 12 weeks of stable-dose treatment. Two composite responder definitions were used as primary end points to classify the response to treatment. The 2-measure composite response required achievement of ≥30% improvement from baseline in the pain score and a rating of "very much improved" or "much improved" on the Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. The 3-measure composite response required satisfaction of these same 2 improvement criteria for pain and global status as well as improvement in physical function on the Short Form 36 (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) score. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of stable-dose treatment, a significantly greater proportion of milnacipran-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients showed clinically meaningful improvements, as evidenced by the proportion of patients meeting the 2-measure composite responder criteria (P < 0.001 in the baseline observation carried forward [BOCF] analysis) and 3-measure composite responder criteria (P < 0.001 in the BOCF). Milnacipran-treated patients also demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline on multiple secondary outcomes, including 24-hour and weekly recall pain score, PGIC score, SF-36 PCS and mental component summary scores, average pain severity score on the Brief Pain Inventory, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire total score (all P < 0.001 versus placebo), and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory total score (P = 0.036 versus placebo). Milnacipran was well tolerated by most patients, with nausea being the most commonly reported adverse event (placebo-adjusted rate of 15.8%). CONCLUSION: Milnacipran administered at a dosage of 100 mg/day improved pain, global status, fatigue, and physical and mental function in patients with fibromyalgia.

Efficacy of milnacipran in patients with fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by widespread pain, tenderness, and a variety of other somatic symptoms. Current treatments are modestly effective. Arguably, the best studied and most effective compounds are tricyclic antidepressants (TCA). Milnacipran, a nontricyclic compound that inhibits the reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine, may provide many of the beneficial effects of TCA with a superior side effect profile. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients with FM were randomly assigned in a 3:3:2 ratio to receive milnacipran twice daily, milnacipran once daily, or placebo for 3 months in a double-blind dose-escalation trial; 92% of twice-daily and 81% of once-daily participants achieved dose escalation to the target milnacipran dose of 200 mg. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was reduction of pain. Both the once- and twice-daily groups showed statistically significant improvements in pain, as well as improvements in global well being, fatigue, and other domains. Response rates for patients receiving milnacipran were equal in patients with and without comorbid depression, but placebo response rates were considerably higher in depressed patients, leading to significantly greater overall efficacy in the nondepressed group. CONCLUSION: In this Phase II study, milnacipran led to statistically significant improvements in pain and other symptoms of FM. The effect sizes were equal to those previously found with TCA, and the drug was generally well tolerated.

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of milnacipran in the treatment of fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia syndrome is a systemic disorder of widespread pain which is thought to result from abnormal pain processing within the central nervous system. There are no currently approved treatments for this indication. Antidepressants appear, however, to be effective, especially those with an action on noradrenergic neurotransmission. The objective of the present study was to test the efficacy of the dual action noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant, milnacipran, in the treatment of fibromyalgia. The 125 patients, who were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible dose escalation trial, were randomized to receive placebo or milnacipran for 4 weeks of dose escalation (up to 200 mg/day), followed by 8 weeks at a constant dose. The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of milnacipran for the treatment of pain and associated symptoms such as fatigue, depressed mood and sleep. 75% of milnacipran-treated patients reported overall improvement, compared with 38% in the placebo group (p < 0.01). Furthermore, 37% of twice daily milnacipran-treated patients reported at least 50% reduction in pain intensity, compared with 14% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.05). 84% of all milnacipran patients escalated to the highest dose (200 mg/day) with no tolerability issues. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and transient in duration. These results suggest that milnacipran may have the potential to relieve not only pain but several of the other symptoms associated with fibromyalgia.