Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Prosthodont ; 22(1): 13-22, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23107189

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Multifactorial etiological factors contribute to denture stomatitis (DS), a type of oral candidiasis; however, unlike other oral candidiasis, DS can occur in a healthy person wearing a denture. In this study, we therefore attempt to explore the association between candida, denture, and mucosal tissue using (1) exfoliative cytology, (2) the candidal levels present in saliva, on mucosal tissues and on denture surfaces, and (3) the salivary flow rate and xerostomic symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study enrolled 32 edentulous participants, 17 without DS as controls and 15 with DS (Newton's classification type II and III). Participants with systemic or other known oral conditions were excluded. Participants completed a xerostomia questionnaire, and salivary flow rates were measured. Samples of unstimulated whole saliva (UWS) and stimulated whole saliva (SWS) were collected. UWS was used for fungal culturing. Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain and quantitative exfoliative cytology were performed on samples from affected and unaffected mucosa from each participant. Levels of Candida species (albicans and non-albicans) were determined in salivary samples (expressed as colony-forming units, CFU), as well as from swab samples obtained from denture fitting surfaces, in addition to affected and unaffected mucosa. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in salivary flow rates, mucosal wetness, or frequency of reported dry mouth comparing participants with and without DS. Exfoliative cytology of mucosal smears demonstrated significantly higher (p= 0.02) inflammatory cell counts in DS patients, as compared with smears of healthy denture-wearers. Candida albicans was significantly more prevalent in saliva (p= 0.03) and on denture surfaces (p= 0.002) of DS participants, whereas mucosal candidal counts and the presence of cytological hyphae did not show significant difference comparing DS to healthy participants. CONCLUSIONS: In this investigation, we presented a unique group of healthy edentulous patients. This population may reflect the general DS population without systemic or other oral diseases. The prominent etiological factor for DS in this population is the presence of candida in denture and saliva. We found that other factors such as saliva flow/xerostomia, fitting of the denture, and the presence of candida in the mucosa, are less important in this population. Therefore, DS treatments in healthy patients should first focus on sanitization of an existing denture and/or fabrication of a new denture.


Subject(s)
Candida albicans/growth & development , Dentures/microbiology , Stomatitis, Denture/microbiology , Stomatitis, Denture/pathology , Xerostomia/etiology , Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Mucosa/microbiology , Saliva/metabolism , Saliva/microbiology , Stomatitis, Denture/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Xerostomia/microbiology
2.
J Prosthodont ; 21(2): 123-9, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22054033

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was the assessment of retention and stability and functional benefits of denture adhesive applied to well-fitting and well-made dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, crossover study to compare two marketed denture adhesives (test cream, Super Poligrip® Free, and test strip, Super Poligrip® Comfort Seal Strips) and an unmarketed cream adhesive (GlaxoSmith Kline Consumer Healthcare) with no adhesive as the negative control. Thirty-six subjects completed the study. One hour after the application of denture adhesive, retention and stability were measured using the Kapur Index and maxillary incisal bite force. Two hours after application, functional tests were used to assess denture movement and peanut particle migration under the denture. Subjects also rated confidence, comfort, satisfaction with dentures, and denture wobble in conjunction with the functional tests. RESULTS: Denture adhesives significantly (p < 0.05) improved retention and stability of well-fitting dentures. Subjects experienced significantly (p < 0.05) fewer dislodgements while eating an apple after adhesive was applied to dentures. Significant (p < 0.05) increases in subjective ratings of confidence and comfort as well as decreases in denture wobble were associated with the use of adhesive. There was significant (p < 0.05) improvement in satisfaction ratings for cream adhesives. A single application of each denture adhesive was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide evidence that use of Super Poligrip® denture adhesives can enhance aspects of performance of complete well-fitting dentures as well as provide increased comfort, confidence, and satisfaction with dentures.


Subject(s)
Adhesives , Denture Retention , Denture, Complete , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bite Force , Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium , Cross-Over Studies , Dental Stress Analysis , Female , Food , Humans , Male , Mastication , Materials Testing , Patient Satisfaction , Polymers , Single-Blind Method
3.
J Clin Dent ; 22(3): 90-5, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21905403

ABSTRACT

Dentin hypersensitivity is a common condition that affects the adult population worldwide. NovaMin is technically described as amorphous sodium calcium phosphosilicate, and has been shown in laboratory studies to rapidly occlude dentin tubules and form a protective hydroxyapatite-like layer on the dentin surface. A number of clinical studies investigating the efficacy of NovaMin for the relief of pain from dentin hypersensitivity have been conducted in the United States, Ireland, China, and India. This article reviews the available literature and finds support based on randomized controlled clinical trials for the use of NovaMin in anhydrous toothpaste formulations in providing relief of pain from dentin hypersensitivity.


Subject(s)
Dentin Desensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Dentin Sensitivity/drug therapy , Glass , Calcium Phosphates/chemistry , Calcium Phosphates/therapeutic use , Cariostatic Agents/therapeutic use , Dentin/drug effects , Dentin/ultrastructure , Durapatite/chemistry , Fluorides/therapeutic use , Glass/chemistry , Humans , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Silicates/chemistry , Silicates/therapeutic use , Toothpastes/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Prosthodont ; 20(4): 251-60, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21463383

ABSTRACT

Denture stomatitis, a common disorder affecting denture wearers, is characterized as inflammation and erythema of the oral mucosal areas covered by the denture. Despite its commonality, the etiology of denture stomatitis is not completely understood. A search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed electronic database (through November 2009) to identify relevant articles for inclusion in a review updating information on the epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis and the potential role of denture materials in this disorder. Epidemiological studies report prevalence of denture stomatitis among denture wearers to range from 15% to over 70%. Studies have been conducted among various population samples, and this appears to influence prevalence rates. In general, where reported, incidence of denture stomatitis is higher among elderly denture users and among women. Etiological factors include poor denture hygiene, continual and nighttime wearing of removable dentures, accumulation of denture plaque, and bacterial and yeast contamination of denture surface. In addition, poor-fitting dentures can increase mucosal trauma. All of these factors appear to increase the ability of Candida albicans to colonize both the denture and oral mucosal surfaces, where it acts as an opportunistic pathogen. Antifungal treatment can eradicate C. albicans contamination and relieve stomatitis symptoms, but unless dentures are decontaminated and their cleanliness maintained, stomatitis will recur when antifungal therapy is discontinued. New developments related to denture materials are focusing on means to reduce development of adherent biofilms. These may have value in reducing bacterial and yeast colonization, and could lead to reductions in denture stomatitis with appropriate denture hygiene.


Subject(s)
Denture, Complete/adverse effects , Stomatitis, Denture/epidemiology , Stomatitis, Denture/etiology , Age Factors , Biofilms , Brazil/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Candida albicans/isolation & purification , Candidiasis, Oral/complications , Chile/epidemiology , Dental Materials/adverse effects , Dental Occlusion, Traumatic/complications , Denture, Complete/microbiology , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Jordan/epidemiology , Mouth Mucosa/injuries , Mouth Mucosa/microbiology , Oral Hygiene , Prevalence , Prosthesis Fitting , Sex Factors , Turkey/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
5.
J Clin Dent ; 16(1): 17-22, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15974219

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This research systematically evaluated the use of a clinically proven desensitizing dentifrice prior to a bleaching regimen in a randomized, multi-center, parallel group, open label clinical study following Good Clinical Practice guidelines. METHODOLOGY: Fourteen dental offices in West Palm Beach, Florida participated in the study during April/May 2004. Fourteen days prior to bleaching, impressions and oral soft tissue assessments were performed, and patients were randomized to either a KNO3 plus fluoride dentifrice (Sensodyne Fresh Mint), or a standard fluoride dentifrice (Crest Regular), brushing 2x per day. On Day 14, patients returned to the dental office for their custom tray and the dispensation of a bleaching kit (Day White Excel 3; 9.5% hydrogen peroxide and KNO3). This was used daily according to the manufacturer's instructions for 30 minutes, and normal oral hygiene continued to be performed using the assigned toothbrush and dentifrice, brushing 2x per day. At the end of each bleaching day, patients answered diary questions about the occurrence and intensity of sensitivity. At the conclusion of the 14-day bleaching period (Day 28), patients returned to their dental office for re-examination, returning all products and diaries. Within seven days of completing the study, patients answered a telephone patient satisfaction survey. RESULTS: A total of 202 patients in fourteen (14) dental offices completed all aspects of the study and were used for the analysis. The professionally dispensed bleaching product provided an improvement of approximately 4.4 Vita shades, regardless of whether it was used with the KNO3 plus fluoride (Sensodyne) or a standard fluoride (Crest) dentifrice. The patient perception of increased sensitivity caused by the bleaching treatment was low but measurable. In the first week of the bleaching, significantly more patients using the KNO3 plus fluoride dentifrice were free from sensitivity (58%) than the standard fluoride dentifrice group (42%). During the 14-day bleaching treatment period, the KNO3 dentifrice patients experienced significantly more "sensitivity free days" (average = 10.1) compared to the standard fluoride dentifrice group (average = 8.6). CONCLUSION: The use of the KNO3 plus fluoride dentifrice (Sensodyne), two weeks prior to and throughout bleaching, may be a useful adjunct for the management of sensitivity caused by professionally dispensed bleaching products. With the bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity, those patients in the KNO3 plus fluoride toothpaste group were significantly more satisfied with their whitening experience and willing to repeat the bleaching treatment.


Subject(s)
Dentifrices/therapeutic use , Dentin Sensitivity/prevention & control , Fluorides/therapeutic use , Nitrates/therapeutic use , Phosphates/therapeutic use , Potassium Compounds/therapeutic use , Toothbrushing , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Dentifrices/chemistry , Drug Combinations , Humans , Tooth Bleaching/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...