Benefit of cilostazol in patients with high risk of bleeding: subanalysis of cilostazol stroke prevention study 2.

BACKGROUND: The Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study 2 (CSPS 2) showed that cilostazol significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 25.7% relative to aspirin, with significantly fewer hemorrhagic events, in patients with prior ischemic stroke, excluding cardioembolic stroke. However, whether the benefit of cilostazol is sustained in patients with a high risk of bleeding has not been examined. METHODS: We conducted a subanalysis of CSPS 2 to examine whether known risk factors for hemorrhagic stroke, such as stroke subtype and systolic blood pressure (SBP), influence the efficacy of the study drugs on hemorrhagic stroke. The relative risk reduction of hemorrhagic stroke was determined from the incidences calculated by the person-year method. The cumulative incidence rates of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke were estimated and plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Incidences of serious hemorrhage and hemorrhage requiring hospital admission were also evaluated in the two treatment groups. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by the Cox proportion hazard model for cilostazol versus aspirin were assessed, and a log-rank test was used for the comparison between treatments. RESULTS: The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with prior lacunar stroke (0.36 vs. 1.20% in person-year, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.70, p < 0.01), but not among those with prior atherothrombotic stroke (0.31 vs. 0.59% in person-year, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-2.0, p = 0.34). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly lower in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group throughout all SBP categories (Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p < 0.01) including SBP above 140 mm Hg (cilostazol 0.45% vs. aspirin 1.44% in person-year; Poisson regression model including time-dependent covariates, p = 0.02). Cilostazol, compared with aspirin, significantly reduced the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, p < 0.01), overall hemorrhage requiring hospital admission (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97, p = 0.04), and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding requiring hospital admission (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhagic stroke was less frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group among patients with lacunar stroke as well as those with increased blood pressure levels. As for extracranial hemorrhage requiring hospitalization, GI bleeding was also less frequent in the cilostazol than in the aspirin group. Cilostazol is supposed to be a therapeutic option to replace aspirin for secondary stroke prevention, especially in these subgroups with high risks for hemorrhagic events.

Cilostazol for prevention of secondary stroke (CSPS 2): an aspirin-controlled, double-blind, randomised non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is efficacious for prevention of stroke recurrence compared with placebo. We designed the second Cilostazol Stroke Prevention Study (CSPS 2) to establish non-inferiority of cilostazol versus aspirin for prevention of stroke, and to compare the efficacy and safety of cilostazol and aspirin in patients with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke. METHODS: Patients aged 20-79 years who had had a cerebral infarction within the previous 26 weeks were enrolled at 278 sites in Japan and allocated to receive 100 mg cilostazol twice daily or 81 mg aspirin once daily for 1-5 years. Patients were allocated according to a computer-generated randomisation sequence by means of a dynamic balancing method using patient information obtained at registration. All patients, study personnel, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of stroke (cerebral infarction, cerebral haemorrhage, or subarachnoid haemorrhage). The predefined margin of non-inferiority was an upper 95% CI limit for the hazard ratio of 1·33. Analyses were by full-analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00234065. FINDINGS: Between December, 2003, and October, 2006, 2757 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive cilostazol (n=1379) or aspirin (n=1378), of whom 1337 on cilostazol and 1335 on aspirin were included in analyses; mean follow-up was 29 months (SD 16). The primary endpoint occurred at yearly rates of 2·76% (n=82) in the cilostazol group and 3·71% (n=119) in the aspirin group (hazard ratio 0·743, 95% CI 0·564-0·981; p=0·0357). Haemorrhagic events (cerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or haemorrhage requiring hospital admission) occurred in fewer patients on cilostazol (0·77%, n=23) than on aspirin (1·78%, n=57; 0·458, 0·296-0·711; p=0·0004), but headache, diarrhoea, palpitation, dizziness, and tachycardia were more frequent in the cilostazol group than in the aspirin group. INTERPRETATION: Cilostazol seems to be non-inferior, and might be superior, to aspirin for prevention of stroke after an ischaemic stroke, and was associated with fewer haemorrhagic events. Therefore, cilostazol could be used for prevention of stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke. FUNDING: Otsuka Pharmaceutical.

Difference in propagation of Ca2+ release in atrial and ventricular myocytes.

Intracellular [Ca2+] ([Ca2+]i) was imaged in atrial and ventricular rat myocytes by means of a high-speed Nipkow confocal microscope. Atrial myocytes with an absent t-tubule system on 8-di- ANEPPS staining showed an initial rise in Ca2+ at the periphery of the cell, which propagated to the interior of the cell. Ventricular myocytes showed a uniform rise in [Ca2+]i after electrical stimulation, consistent with a prominent t-tubular network. In atrial myocytes, there was a much shorter time between the peak of the [Ca2+]i transient and the peak contraction as compared to ventricular myocytes. A regional release of Ca2+ induced by an exposure of one end of the myocyte to caffeine with a rapid solution switcher resulted in a uniform propagation of Ca2+ down the length of the cell in atrial myocytes, but we found no propagation in ventricular myocytes. A staining with rhodamine 123 indicated a much greater density of mitochondria in ventricular myocytes than in atrial myocytes. Thus the atrial myocytes display a lack of "local control" of Ca2+ release, with propagation after the Ca2+ release at the periphery induced by stimulation or at one end of the cell induced by exposure to caffeine. Ventricular myocytes showed the presence of local control, as indicated by an absence of the propagation of a local caffeine-induced Ca2+ transient. We suggest that this finding, as well as a reduced delay between the peak of the [Ca2+]i transient and the peak shortening in atrial myocytes, could be due in part to reduced Ca2+ buffering provided by mitochondria in atrial myocytes as opposed to ventricular myocytes.

Nicorandil attenuates the mitochondrial Ca2+ overload with accompanying depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane in the heart.

The anti-anginal drug nicorandil has been demonstrated to protect the myocardium against ischemic injury in both experimental and clinical studies. Although nicorandil seems to protect the myocardium via activation of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ (mitoKATP) channels, the mechanisms underlying its cardioprotection have remained elusive. We therefore examined whether nicorandil depolarizes the mitochondrial membrane and attenuates the mitochondrial Ca2+ overload. With the use of a Nipkow confocal system, the mitochondrial Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]m) and the mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim) in rat ventricular myocytes were measured by loading cells with rhod-2 and JC-1 respectively. The number of cell hypercontractures resulting from mitochondrial Ca2+ overload was counted. Exposing cells to ouabain (1 mM) evoked mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and increased the intensity of rhod-2 fluorescence to 180+/-15% of baseline ( p<0.001). Nicorandil (100 microM) significantly attenuated the ouabain-induced mitochondrial Ca2+ overload (129+/-4% of baseline; p<0.001 vs. ouabain). Nicorandil decreased the DeltaPsim during application of ouabain, thereby reducing the intensity of JC-1 fluorescence to 89+/-2% of baseline ( p<0.05). Exposure of myocytes to ouabain eventually resulted in cell hypercontracture (51+/-2%). This ouabain-induced cell hypercontracture was blunted by application of nicorandil (37+/-2%, p<0.05 vs. ouabain). Moreover, these effects of nicorandil were abolished by 5-hydroxydecanoate (500 microM), a putative mitoKATP channel blocker, and by glibenclamide (10 microM), a nonselective KATP channel blocker. Our results suggest that nicorandil attenuates the matrix Ca2+ overload with accompanying depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane. Such effect might potentially be attributed to the mechanism of cardioprotection afforded by nicorandil.