ExacTrac X-Ray 6D Imaging During Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy of Spinal and Nonspinal Metastases.

The objective was to investigate the possibility of using ExacTrac X-ray (ETX) for 6D image guidance in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of bone metastasis and to propose a patient management protocol. The analyses were first obtained from measurements on a pelvic phantom and on 19 patients treated for bone metastasis. The phantom study consisted of applying known offsets and evaluating the ETX level of accuracy, where results were compared with kV-cone beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT). Two groups of patients, 10 spinal and 9 nonspinal SBRT cases, were analyzed to evaluate ETX imaging for different bone localisations. A comparison was made between kV-CBCT and ETX prior to the treatment fractions. During treatments, two other kV-CBCT/ETX image pairs were also acquired and a total of 224 shifts were compared. A second study, using the ETX monitoring module, analyzed the intrafraction motion of 8 other patients. In the phantom study, the root mean square (RMS) of the translational and rotational discrepancies between ETX and kV-CBCT were < 0.6 mm and < 0.4°, respectively. For both groups of patients, the RMS of the discrepancies observed between the two imaging systems were greater than the phantom experiment while still remaining < 1 mm and < 0.7°. In the nonspinal group, three patients (2 scapulas and 1 humerus) did not have consistent shift values with ETX due to a lack of anatomical information. When ETX monitoring was used during irradiation, the setup errors measured were on average less than 1 mm/1°. The results obtained validated the use of ETX for 6D image guidance during bone SBRT. Real-time tracking of the target position improves the accuracy of the irradiation. This strategy allowed for faster correction of out-of-tolerance positioning errors. The registration of bone lesions with poor anatomical information is a limitation of this 2D-kV imaging system.

Practical and technical key challenges in head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: The GORTEC point of view.

Anatomical variations occur during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy (RT) treatment. These variations may result in underdosage to the target volume or overdosage to the organ at risk. Replanning during the treatment course can be triggered to overcome this issue. Due to technological, methodological and clinical evolutions, tools for adaptive RT (ART) are becoming increasingly sophisticated. The aim of this paper is to give an overview of the key steps of an H&N ART workflow and tools from the point of view of a group of French-speaking medical physicists and physicians (from GORTEC). Focuses are made on image registration, segmentation, estimation of the delivered dose of the day, workflow and quality assurance for an implementation of H&N offline and online ART. Practical recommendations are given to assist physicians and medical physicists in a clinical workflow.

Quantitative MRI to Characterize Hypoxic Tumors in Comparison to FMISO PET/CT for Radiotherapy in Oropharynx Cancers.

Intratumoral hypoxia is associated with a poor prognosis and poor response to treatment in head and neck cancers. Its identification would allow for increasing the radiation dose to hypoxic tumor subvolumes. 18F-FMISO PET imaging is the gold standard; however, quantitative multiparametric MRI could show the presence of intratumoral hypoxia. Thus, 16 patients were prospectively included and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FMISO PET/CT, and multiparametric quantitative MRI (DCE, diffusion and relaxometry T1 and T2 techniques) in the same position before treatment. PET and MRI sub-volumes were segmented and classified as hypoxic or non-hypoxic volumes to compare quantitative MRI parameters between normoxic and hypoxic volumes. In total, 13 patients had hypoxic lesions. The Dice, Jaccard, and overlap fraction similarity indices were 0.43, 0.28, and 0.71, respectively, between the FDG PET and MRI-measured lesion volumes, showing that the FDG PET tumor volume is partially contained within the MRI tumor volume. The results showed significant differences in the parameters of SUV in FDG and FMISO PET between patients with and without measurable hypoxic lesions. The quantitative MRI parameters of ADC, T1 max mapping and T2 max mapping were different between hypoxic and normoxic subvolumes. Quantitative MRI, based on free water diffusion and T1 and T2 mapping, seems to be able to identify intra-tumoral hypoxic sub-volumes for additional radiotherapy doses.

Evaluation of a Dedicated Software "Elements™ Spine SRS, Brainlab®" for Target Volume Definition in the Treatment of Spinal Bone Metastases With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Introduction: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a treatment option for spine metastases. The International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) has published consensus guidelines for target delineation in spine SBRT. A new software called Elements™ Spine SRS by Brainlab® that includes the module Elements SmartBrush Spine (v3.0, Munich, Germany) has been developed specifically for SBRT treatment of spine metastases, and the latter provides the ability to perform semiautomatic clinical target volume (CTV) generation based on gross tumor volume (GTV) localization and guidelines. The aims of our study were to evaluate this software by studying differences in volumes between semiautomatic CTV contours compared to manual contouring performed by an expert radiation oncologist and to determine the dosimetric impact of these differences on treatment plans. Methods: A total of 35 volumes ("Expert GTV" and "Expert CTV") from 30 patients were defined by a single expert. A semiautomatic definition of these 35 CTVs based on the location of "Expert GTV" and following ISRC guidelines was also performed in Elements SmartBrush Spine ("Brainlab CTV"). The spatial overlap between "Brainlab" and "Expert" CTVs was calculated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). We considered a threshold of 0.80 or above to indicate that Elements SmartBrush Spine performed very well with adequate contours for clinical use. Two dosimetric treatment plans, each corresponding to a specific planning target volume (PTV; Expert PTV, Brainlab PTV), were created for 11 patients. Results: We showed that "Brainlab CTV" and "Expert CTV" mean volumes were 29.8 ± 16.1 and 28.7 ± 15.7 cm3, respectively (p = 0.23). We also showed that the mean DSC for semiautomatic contouring relative to expert manual contouring was 0.85 ± 0.08 and less than 0.80 in five cases. For metastases involving the vertebral body only (n = 13,37%), the mean DSC was 0.90 ± 0.03, and for ones involving other or several vertebral regions (n = 22.63%), the mean DSC was 0.81 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001). The comparison of dosimetric treatment plans was performed for equivalent PTV coverage. There were no differences between doses received by organs at risk (spinal cord and esophagus) for Expert and Brainlab PTVs, respectively. Conclusion: The results showed that the semiautomatic method had quite good accuracy and can be used in clinical routine even for complex lesions.

Synthetic MRI for Radiotherapy Planning for Brain and Prostate Cancers: Phantom Validation and Patient Evaluation.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of T 1 and T 2 mappings derived from a multispectral pulse sequence (magnetic resonance image compilation, MAGiC®) on 1.5-T MRI and with conventional sequences [gradient echo with variable flip angle (GRE-VFA) and multi-echo spin echo (ME-SE)] compared to the reference values for the purpose of radiotherapy treatment planning. Methods: The accuracy of T 1 and T 2 measurements was evaluated with 2 coils [head and neck unit (HNU) and BODY coils] on phantoms using descriptive statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. The reproducibility and repeatability of T 1 and T 2 measurements were performed on 15 sessions with the HNU coil. The T 1 and T 2 synthetic sequences obtained by both methods were evaluated according to quality assurance (QA) requirements for radiotherapy. T 1 and T 2 in vivo measurements of the brain or prostate tissues of two groups of five subjects were also compared. Results: The phantom results showed good agreement (mean bias, 8.4%) between the two measurement methods for T 1 values between 490 and 2,385 ms and T 2 values between 25 and 400 ms. MAGiC® gave discordant results for T 1 values below 220 ms (bias with the reference values, from 38% to 1,620%). T 2 measurements were accurately estimated below 400 ms (mean bias, 8.5%) by both methods. The QA assessments are in agreement with the recommendations of imaging for contouring purposes for radiotherapy planning. On patient data of the brain and prostate, the measurements of T 1 and T 2 by the two quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods were comparable (max difference, <7%). Conclusion: This study shows that the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the multispectral pulse sequence (MAGiC®) were compatible with its use for radiotherapy treatment planning in a range of values corresponding to soft tissues. Even validated for brain imaging, MAGiC® could potentially be used for prostate qMRI.

Characterization of positioning uncertainties in PET-CT-MR trimodality solutions for radiotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positioning uncertainties of two PET/CT-MR imaging setups, C1 and C2. Because the PET/CT data were acquired on the same hybrid device with automatic image registration, experiments were conducted using CT-MRI data. In C1, a transfer table was used, which allowed the patient to move from one imager to another while maintaining the same position. In C2, the patient stood up and was positioned in the same radiotherapy treatment position on each imager. The two setups provided a set of PET/CT and MR images. The accuracy of the registration software was evaluated on the CT-MRI data of one patient using known translations and rotations of MRI data. The uncertainties on the two setups were estimated using a phantom and a cohort of 30 patients. The accuracy of the positioning uncertainties was evaluated using descriptive statistics and a t-test to determine whether the mean shift significantly deviated from zero (p < 0.05) for each setup. The maximum registration errors were less than 0.97 mm and 0.6° for CT-MRI registration. On the phantom, the mean total uncertainties were less than 2.74 mm and 1.68° for C1 and 1.53 mm and 0.33° for C2. For C1, the t-test showed that the displacements along the z-axis did not significantly deviate from zero (p = 0.093). For C2, significant deviations from zero were present for anterior-posterior and superior-inferior displacements. The mean total uncertainties were less than 4 mm and 0.42° for C1 and less than 1.39 mm and 0.27° for C2 in the patients. Furthermore, the t-test showed significant deviations from zero for C1 on the anterior-posterior and roll sides. For C2, there was a significant deviation from zero for the left-right displacements.This study shows that transfer tables require careful evaluation before use in radiotherapy.

Evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction 6D motion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of spinal metastases: influence of treatment time.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the amplitude of translational and rotational movements occurring during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of spinal metastases in two different positioning devices. The relevance of intra-fractional imaging and the influence of treatment time were evaluated. METHODS: Twenty patients were treated in the supine position either (1) on a body vacuum cushion with arms raised and resting on a clegecel or (2) on an integrated SBRT solution consisting of a SBRT table top, an Orfit™ AIO system, and a vacuum cushion. Alignments between the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the planning computed tomography allowed corrections of inter- and intra-fraction positional shifts using a 6D table. The absolute values of the translational and rotational setup errors obtained for 329 CBCT were recorded. The translational 3D vector, the maximum angle, and the characteristic times of the treatment fractions were calculated. RESULTS: An improvement in the mean (SD) inter-fraction 3D vector (mm) from 7.8 (5.9) to 5.9 (3.8) was obtained by changing the fixation devices from (1) to (2) (p < 0.038). The maximum angles were less than 2° for a total of 87% for (1) and 96% for (2). The mean (SD) of the intra-fraction 3D vectors (mm) was lower for the new 1.1 (0.8) positioning fixation (2) compared to the old one (1) 1.7 (1.7) (p = 0.004). The angular corrections applied in the intra-fraction were on average very low (0.4°) and similar between the two systems. A strong correlation was found between the 3D displacement vector and the fraction time for (1) and (2) with regression coefficients of 0.408 (0.262-0.555, 95% CI) and 0.069 (0.010-0.128, 95% CI), respectively. An accuracy of 1 mm would require intra-fraction imaging every 5 min for both systems. If the expected accuracy was 2 mm, then only system (2) could avoid intra-fractional imaging. CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed us to evaluate setup errors of two immobilization devices for spine SBRT. The association of inter- and intra-fraction imaging with 6D repositioning of a patient is inevitable. The correlation between treatment time and corrections to be applied encourages us to move toward imaging modalities which allow a reduction in fraction time.

FDG and FMISO PET-guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the reference treatment for non-resectable locally-advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Increasing radiotherapy total dose in the whole tumour volume has been shown to be deleterious. Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) offers the potential to identify smaller and biologically meaningful target volumes that could be irradiated with larger doses without compromising Organs At Risk (OAR) tolerance. This study investigated four scenarios, based on 18FDG and 18F-miso PET/CT, to delineate the target volumes and derive radiotherapy plans delivering up to 74Gy. METHOD: Twenty-one NSCLC patients, selected from a prospective phase II trial, had 18FDG- and 18F-miso PET/CT before the start of radiotherapy and 18FDG PET/CT during the radiotherapy (42Gy). The plans were based planned on a standard plan delivering 66 Gy (plan 1) and on three different boost strategies to deliver 74Gy total dose in pre-treatment 18FDG hotspot (70% of SUVmax) (plan 2), pre-treatment 18F-miso target (SUVmax > 1.4) (plan 3) and per-treatment 18FDG residual (40% of SUVmax). (plan 4). RESULTS: The mean target volumes were 4.8 cc (± 1.1) for 18FDG hotspot, 38.9 cc (± 14.5) for 18F-miso and 36.0 cc (± 10.1) for per-treatment 18FDG. In standard plan (66 Gy), the mean dose covering 95% of the PTV (D95%) were 66.5 (± 0.33), 66.1 (± 0.32) and 66.1 (± 0.32) Gy for 18FDG hotspot, 18F-miso and per-treatment 18FDG. In scenario 2, the mean D95% was 72.5 (± 0.25) Gy in 18FDG hotspot versus 67.9 (± 0.49) and 67.9 Gy (± 0.52) in 18F-miso and per-treatment 18FDG, respectively. In scenario 3, the mean D95% was 72.2 (± 0.27) Gy to 18F-miso versus 70.4 (± 0.74) and 69.5Gy (± 0.74) for 18FDG hotspot and per-treatment 18FDG, respectively. In scenario 4, the mean D95% was 73.1 (± 0.3) Gy to 18FDG per-treatment versus 71.9 (± 0.61) and 69.8 (± 0.61) Gy for 18FDG hotspot and 18F-miso, respectively. The dose/volume constraints to OARs were matched in all scenarios. CONCLUSION: Escalated doses can be selectively planned in NSCLC target volumes delineated on 18FDG and 18F-miso PET/CT functional images. The most relevant strategy should be investigated in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (RTEP5, NCT01576796 , registered 15 june 2012).

Bevacizumab enhances efficiency of radiotherapy in a lung adenocarcinoma rodent model: Role of αvß3 imaging in determining optimal window.

INTRODUCTION: Earlier studies indicated that bevacizumab could favorably be combined with radiation. However excessive damage to tumor vasculature can result in radioresistance and clinical data suggest that treatment sequencing may be important when combining bevacizumab with radiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether αvß3 scintigraphic imaging could provide information to determine the optimal combination schedule of bevacizumab and radiotherapy on a lung adenocarcinoma model in mice. METHODS: The tumor volume and angiogenesis changes induced after bevacizumab and radiation treatment were evaluated using (99m)Tc-RGD on a microSPECT/CT. First, we determined the optimal dose regimen for bevacizumab and radiotherapy alone. Second, the combined effects of bevacizumab and radiation were evaluated according to the combination timing (radiation 2, 24, 48 hours after bevacizumab and 48 hours before bevacizumab). RESULTS: The optimal dose regimen is 20mg/kg for bevacizumab and 12.5 Gy for radiotherapy with a significant decrease of tumoral uptake and volume at day 9 compared to the controls (+8.8%, +7.7%, and +44% volume, respectively, and +9.8%, +3.8%, and +207% uptake, respectively). Scintigraphic imaging showed a significant increased RGD tumor uptake two hours after bevacizumab treatment compared to 24 hours and controls (p=0.02). When bevacizumab treatment was combined with radiation, the best combination appears to be the administration of bevacizumab two hours prior to radiation with better results than single treatments (p < 0.05). On the contrary, bevacizumab given 24 hours prior to radiation led to less tumor growth delay compared to a single agent, without significant difference compared to the controls. Histological results confirmed these data with an increased percentage of necrosis (p=0.04) and a decrease of angiogenesis (p=0.04) in the optimal combination group. CONCLUSIONS: The RGD tracer helps us identify the vascular normalization window and it shows a supra-additive effect of bevacizumab when administered two hours before radiotherapy.