Local Variation in Inclusion on Kidney Transplant Waiting Lists: Analysis in the Reference Area of a Kidney Transplant Center.

BACKGROUND: Access for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to the renal transplant (RT) waiting list can vary depending on the criteria used and how they are applied in each dialysis unit. METHODS: This study was performed in the reference area (2.5 million inhabitants) of a transplant center. Data were from a regional registry (Information System of the Autonomous Coordination of Transplants in Andalusia) of total dialysis patients. Patients were grouped according to transplant status as: effective waiting list (WL); never recorded or excluded (E); incomplete immunologic study or discharge data (IIS); temporary contraindication (TC); or active (A). RESULTS: There were 1424 dialysis patients. Of these, 58% were E, 18% were IIS, 14% were TC, and 10% were A. Significant differences were detected for proportion of patients listed as active status (A) in 3 hospital dialysis units (2.9%-13.4%) and 12 hemodialysis centers (4.2%-29.2%); proportion of IIS cases in the hospitals (0%-57%) and dialysis centers (0%-58%); and in proportion of TC cases in the hospitals (19%-50%) and dialysis centers (2.5%-19.3%). The mean age of patients varied significantly between IIS, TC, and A groups (60.3, 54.8, and 52.3 years old, respectively, P < .001). Accentuated differences between the 2 provinces included in the sector were verified. There are notable differences in inclusion of pre-dialysis patients between hospital units. CONCLUSION: We detected considerable variability between hospital units and non-hospital dialysis centers in relation to inclusion on the active transplant waiting list and the proportion of patients with IIS or TC status. It is essential to implement a more homogeneous system for case selection through a specific intervention program from the reference center.

Reasons for Noninclusion on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List: Analysis in a Set of Hemodialysis Centers.

INTRODUCTION: End-stage renal disease patients' access to the renal transplant (RT) waiting list (WL) depends on general criteria and their specific application in the different treatment units. METHODS: Study in nonhospital hemodialysis centers (n = 9), dependent on an adult RT center. Cases included 228 patients considered to have nonactive status on the WL due to incomplete immunologic data (no blood group or HLA typing) or temporary contraindication from an incomplete pretransplant study (nonimmunologic) or comorbidity. Each individual situation was studied by reviewing the center's clinical history with the nephrologist in charge. RESULTS: Three situations were classified three groups. (1) Patients in this group had incomplete basic study (65 patients, 28.5%) pending cardiologic evaluation in 34%; urologic evaluation, 26%; both 18%; others, 9%; study not initiated, 12%. (2) Patients in this group had pre-existing or onset comorbidities (117 patients, 51.3%) pending studies or confirmed resolution: obesity, 30%; cancer, 17%; cardiovascular disease, 14%; digestive pathology, 10%; infection, 9%; neuropsychiatric disorders, 7%; multiple, 13%. (3) Patients in this group had other situations contraindicating RT (46 patients, 20.2%): poor therapeutic adherence, 30%; negative will of the patient, 26%; social issues, 9%; excluded by the center (not reported), 35%. CONCLUSIONS: We detected a high incidence of cases pending basic tests for inclusion on the WL. Obesity can be highlighted as the most frequent cause for noninclusion. Further support and coordination is required with referral hospital centers to increase and refine the RT WL.

Survival and Evolution of Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients From Type II Asystolic Donations: A Single-center Experience.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, stagnation in the number of kidneys from after brain-dead donors (DBD) has stimulated the use of non-heart beating donors (NHBDs). Herein we present our 5-year experience with type II Maastricht NHBDs in renal transplantation. METHODS: All patients (n = 50) in this study received type II Maastricht NHBD kidneys (March 2012 to February 2017), with a median follow-up of 33 months. RESULTS: Mean donor age was 39 ± 12 years, mean creatinine 1.24 ± 0.2 mg/dL, and the most frequently observed blood group (donors and recipients) was type A (64%). Recipients were slightly younger (51 ± 11 years old), with mean time on dialysis of 30 ± 24 months. Almost all were primary transplants. Pre-transplant panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) were <25%; initial immunosuppression was thymoglobulin, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and delayed introduction of tacrolimus. Six percent were nonfunctioning kidneys; 79.6% presented with delayed renal function (mean duration 14 ± 9 days). Acute rejection was seen in 6% of patients. Mean creatinine at month 3 was 1.7 ± 0.8 mg/dL, and 1.5 ± 0.8 mg/dL in the first year. The last available mean creatinine was 1.54 ± 0.7 mg/dL. Proteinuria in the third month, first year, and third year was 0.70, 0.41, and 0.26 g/d, respectively. Recipient survival at the first, third, and fifth year was 100%, 100%, and 86%, and when graft-censored for death was 94%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection during first year was 6%, and 2% in the second year. Exitus incidence was 4% and cytomegalovirus infection was 21.3%. BK viremia between 1000 and 10,000 copies/mL was seen in 4.3%, and reached >10,000 copies/mL in 2.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Type II NHBD has shown limited frequency of nonfunctioning kidney and high functional delay. The results in survival and renal function are very acceptable, comparable with levels seen in donation after brain death.

Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection After Renal Transplantation: Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Resistant cytomegalovirus (R-CMV) is an emerging problem in the renal transplantation population. The most frequent CMVs are high-resistance mutations (UL97 gene). METHODS: We describe our experience in management of R-CMV after renal transplant at our center (2012-2016). RESULTS: We encountered 3 cases of R-CMV infection after renal transplant (all primary infections). All 3 patients received induction therapy with corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. The first patient (basiliximab induction, preemptive CMV) developed CMV replication on day +53, which responded poorly both to standard-dose valganciclovir (vGCV) and high-dose ganciclovir (GCV) (creatinine clearance [CrCl] >70 mL/min; vGCV 900 mg twice daily for 50 days and GCV 7.5 mg/kg twice daily for 8 days). Hematologic toxicity occurred. The R-CMV test was positive and foscarnet (FOS) was initiated (90 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days). The second patient presented CMV infection (day +30, thymoglobulin induction, CMV prophylaxis), which was not controlled with the high dose (CrCl 23 mL/min; GCV 3.5 mg/kg twice daily and vGCV 900 mg twice daily), resulting in severe neutropenia. R-CMV was detected and FOS initiated (FOS 50 mg/kg twice daily for 7 days and 50 mg/kg every 2 days for 13 days). The third patient's infection occurred on day +22 (basiliximab induction, preemptive CMV). Standard-dose vGCV was uneffective (CrCl >70 mL/min, vGCV 900 mg twice daily) and it did not respond to the high dose (GCV 7.5 mg/kg twice daily and vGCV 2700 mg/d). Moderate hematologic toxicity occurred. R-CMV was diagnosed and FOS treatment begun (FOS 70 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Resistant CMV infection may be severe due to viral infection and side effects of high-dose antiviral treatment. We presented 3 cases requiring the use of FOS in the absence of response or toxic effects from the usual treatment, with an optimal sustained response (temporary in case 2) and without serious side effects.

Assessment of the Renal Function in Potential Donors of Living Kidney Transplants: Expanded Study.

INTRODUCTION: It is very important to determine as accurately as possible the renal function in potential living renal transplant donors, especially those with limited renal function (CrCl <90 mL/m/1.73 m(2)), age older than 50 years, and cardiovascular risk factors that might favor the development of long-term kidney diseases. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using EDTA-Cr51 and the estimations based on creatinine (eGFR): Cr clearance (CCr) with 24-hour urine and estimated using Cockroft-Gault (adjusted by using body surface area-Mosteller formula-SC), MDRD-4, MDRD-6, and CKD-EPI to determine the usefulness of different methods from EDTA-Cr51to evaluate the kidney function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The kidney function evaluation has been made to 105 potential kidney donors using the EDTA-Cr51 method. The GFR obtained through the EDTA-Cr51 is compared with the CCr values in 24-hour urine and eGFR based on creatinine (Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD4, MDRD6, and CKD-EPI). RESULTS: Using the Bland Altman graphic we have observed that the most dispersed results are obtained with the eGFR using CCr in 24-hour urine and CKD-EPI. By means of Pasing & Bablock, we realized that MDRD-4 and MDRD-6 show the highest approximation to the reference method proposed to be substituted, whereas CCr shows a high dispersion. CONCLUSIONS: eGFR using MDRD-4 and MDRD-6 formulas reveal the best adjustment to the measure by EDTA-Cr51. This might represent the best option if a direct eGFR measure is not available.

New Antivirals for Hepatitis C Infection Among Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Case Report.

The most common hepatopathy in end-stage renal disease is chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which decreases allograft and patient survival in kidney transplants. Until last year we did not have treatments free of interferon, which was contraindicated after renal transplantation owing to the risk of allograft rejection. Recently, new drugs have been discovered for interferon-free regimens. These drugs present a cure rate of up to 90% and can be used in transplant recipients. Here we present our 1st 3 cases. In our experience, new antivirals have proven to be effective and safe for the treatment of HCV hepatopathy in kidney transplant recipients and liver-kidney transplantation, thus helping us to prevent complications related to HCV infection in transplant recipients.

Associated characteristics and impact on survival of post renal-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease: case-control study from a regional registry.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) after renal transplantation (RT) is an unusual complication but one that impacts greatly on survival. We examined possible predisposing factors and their effect on survival using data from the Andalusian Transplant Co-ordination Information System (SICATA) regional computerized database of patients on renal replacement therapy due to chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: The study population comprised all RT undertaken at adult centers in Andalusia from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2009 (N = 5577). We retrospectively analyzed cases at December 31, 2011 (N = 60). A control group comprised the 2 closest RT in time done at the same center and with equal or greater graft survival at the time of diagnosis of LPD in the associated case (N = 120). The basic variables were obtained from the general register (1990-2009) and widened from the specific register (2000-2009). Case-control comparison of survival was done with Kaplan-Meier from diagnosis to death or organ loss censored for death. Cox univariate and multivariate (LPD plus available covariables of demonstrated effect) analyses were done. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between cases and controls regarding the characteristics of the recipient or of the donor/organ, initial immunosuppression by intention to treat, or post-RT course. The impact on recipient survival 5 years after diagnosis was as follows: LPD, 35%; controls, 90% (P < .000). Cox univariate analysis showed the relative risk (RR) of death for LPD was 11.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2-20.9; P < .000) and the multivariate analysis showed relative risk (RR) = 13.87 (7.45-25.3; P < .000). The impact on death-censored graft survival 5 years after diagnosis was as follows: LPD, 65%; controls, 87% (P = .007). Cox univariate analysis was as follows: RR of failure for LPD, 2.70 (95% CI, 1.3-5.7; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences between LPD cases and contemporary controls regarding the basic characteristics of the recipient, donor/organ, initial immunosuppression, or initial graft evolution. There was an enormous impact on both patient and graft survival.

Influence of donor specific HLA antibodies detected by Luminex in kidney graft survival: a multivariate analysis.

Some studies have demonstrated the clinical relevance of a positive virtual crossmatch in graft survival; nevertheless, other donor and recipient variables influence the outcome of the transplant. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of a positive virtual crossmatch in the graft survival performing a multivariate analysis including other pretransplant variables. A total of 879 deceased kidney transplantations were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression model. After performing the multivariate analysis, a positive virtual crossmatch against class I (adjusted HR 6.613; 95% CI 3.222-13.573), class II (adjusted HR 2.419; 95% CI 1.170-5.002) and class I+II (adjusted HR 5.717; 95% CI 1.925-16.975) detected by single antigen Luminex was the variable conferring the greatest relative risk of graft loss. A positive virtual crossmatch predicts a worse kidney graft survival even after correction by other variables and therefore, transplantation of patients with positive virtual crossmatches should be avoided.

Information channels and the dynamics of uptake of living kidney donors: a retrospective study in a reference area.

INTRODUCTION: Activity in renal transplantation at our center continues to grow due to the gradual increase in living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Our objective was to describe the generation process of living donation in our area of influence including two provinces and 18 chronic kidney disease (CKD) treatment units in particular the origin of paired donor/recipients and information channels. METHODS: We included all actual and discarded potential donors from 2005 to 2009. History and telephone interviews provided a description of the cases, sources and process information. RESULTS: Among 95 potential pairs we performed 44 LDKT during this period. The recipients were predialysis (38%), on dialysis (54%), or after prior transplantation (8%). Among the 10 dialysis centers, the referral rate ranged between 0 and 8.6 pairs per 100 patients. We contacted 78 (83%) donors for an interview, among whom 53% first learned of LDKT when the recipient already had advanced CKD at predialysis or dialysis stages. Television was the main means of this first knowledge (38%), followed by the health care staff. LDKT was not primarily a treatment option offered by the nephrologist for 65% of subjects; however, the nephrologists were the major reference sources followed by the Internet and transplant coordinators. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of donations are initiated before the recipient is on dialysis, but eventuates predialysis in only 38% of cases. The possibility of being referred seems to be influenced by the recipient's treatment center. We need a more proactive role of nephrologists to offer this therapeutic option. This study identified the importance of public information to identify targets and design strategies to disseminate quality information on LDKT.

Transthoracic echocardiographic findings in patients with chronic kidney disease awaiting kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors in patients undergoing dialysis therapy or transplantation is associated with a 3.5- to 50-fold higher risk than in the general population. The primary cause of death in transplant recipients is cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: To report echocardiographic findings using a screening protocol to detect heart disease in candidates for kidney transplantation. METHODS: Between November 2005 and December 2009, we examined 356 patients using 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: A high prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, valvulopathy, and valve calcification was observed. There was a positive correlation between valve calcification and female sex, age (P<.001), duration of renal replacement therapy (P=.01), peripheral arterial disease (P=.02), cerebrovascular disease (P=.005), and high concentration of lipoprotein(a) (P=.02). CONCLUSION: An echocardiographic study should be part of the initial evaluation in candidates for renal transplantation.

Calcimimetics and bone mineral density in renal transplant patients with persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: The persistence of secondary hyperparathyroidism plays an important role in posttransplant bone loss. Calcimimetics are efficient to control metabolic alterations associated with this problem, but there are few publications that assess their effects on bone density. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study assessed the effects of a single daily dose of cinacalcet on calcemia, phosphatemia, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bone densitometry (femur and spine) values of 27 renal transplant patients with stable kidney function, calcium > 10.5 mg/dL, and PTH > 65 pg/mL. RESULTS: A preliminary study after 6 months showed decreased calcemia (11.05 +/- 0.5 to 10.18 +/- 0.6 mg/dL; P < .0001), reduced levels of intact PTH (iPTH; 258 +/- 104 to 209.61 +/- 127 pg/mL; P < .05), and increased phosphatemia (2.38 +/- 0.45 to 2.54 +/- 0.3 mg/dL; P < .05). We also observed an increase in femoral neck bone mass with improved T score (-1.36 +/- 1.19 to -1.05 +/- 0.84 g/cm(2); P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Cinacalcet was effective in the management of posttransplant persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism, resulting in decreased calcemia and iPTH, while also improving femoral neck bone loss. Longer-term studies with control groups are needed to determine the drug's influence on overall bone mineral density.

Trends in kidney transplantation outcome: the Andalusian Kidney Transplant Registry, 1984-2007.

Herein we have presented the first report from the Andalusian Kidney Transplant Registry, a Public Health Service Regional Registry in Andalusia, Spain (general population, 8 million). The current analysis was limited to 5599 kidney-alone transplants from deceased donors, grouped into 4 time periods: 1984-1989 (n = 846); 1990-1995 (n = 1172); 1996-2001 (n = 1801); and 2002-2007 (n = 2060). The age of the transplant patients rose over time to 21.7% of recipients of ages >or=60 years in 2002-2007. In the later years we observed an increased incidence of vascular and diabetic causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Patients who underwent retransplantation increased from 2.7% in 1984-1989 to 8.1% in 2002-2007. Time on previous renal replacement therapy (RRT) increased from 33.1 +/- 29 to 48 +/- 53 months. Patient survivals at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years were 96%, 91%, 83%, and 63%, respectively. Censoring for death, graft survivals were 90%, 80%, 67%, and 45%, respectively. Compared with the 1984-1989 period, patient survival improved by about 10% (P < .001) since 1990, remaining stable to 2007. Censored 5-year graft survivals progressively improved from 72% to 77%, 82%, and 85% (P < .001). Upon multivariate analysis, gender, age >39 years, diabetes, and RRT duration were independent predictors of patient survival. Age <18 years, retransplantation, and positive hepatitis C virus serology were independent predictors of lower graft survival. Considering 1984-1989 as the reference time period, both patient and graft mortality risks continuously decreased over the following 3 periods (relative risk [RR] = 0.5-0.4-0.3 for patient mortality; RR = 0.8-0.6-0.5 for graft mortality). In summary, despite an increased number of adverse risk factors, both patient and graft survivals have improved from 1984 to date.

[Analysis of the reasons for non graft initial function in our series of the last eleven years]. / Análisis de las causas de no función inicial del injerto en nuestra serie de los últimos once años.

UNLABELLED: FUNDAMENTAL: [corrected] To know which risk factor of delayed graft function in our patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed 469 transplants, 270 had good initial function and 199 had delayed function graft. Variables studies in booth groups were: age, sex and dead cause of donant, type of extraction and place were it was done, implantation side, vases multiple, isquemia times, age and receptor sex, HLA compatibility, retransplant, Ac Anti-VHC, PTH pretransplant, years in waiting list, hiperinmunization, number of transfusion, and type of inmunosupretion. RESULTS: Univariant study: significant differences were found in age and dead cause of donant, isquemia times, years in waiting list, hiperinmunization, number of transfusions, and HLA-B incompatibility. Multivariate study: we have significant differences in age of donant, could isquemia time, years in waiting list, cuadruple? Inmunosupretion. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest to short could and revascularization isquemia time as possible, and use less nefrotoxic inmunosupretion pautes in high-risk patients.