Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurology ; 78(2): 122-8, 2012 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22205757

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the corticospinal system emanating from the primary motor cortex may be organized to facilitate generation of dystonic movements. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, finger movement (FM) representations were assessed in 10 patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD) and 10 matched healthy controls by transcranial magnetic stimulation during rest. Evoked finger movements of the right hand were recorded using an instrumented data glove. Patterns of finger joint movements were analyzed using cluster analysis. Principal component analysis and centers of gravity for finger movement representations and motor evoked potentials recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi muscles were computed. For comparison, high-resolution somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were recorded after electrical stimulation of the thumb (D1) or little finger (D5) in the same patients. Source reconstruction for the N20 SSEP component was performed using a dual-dipole model. RESULTS: Stimulation of the resting motor cortex did not reveal overt abnormalities in FHD, neither with respect to finger joint movement patterns nor with respect to the topologic organization of finger movements or intrinsic hand muscle representations. However, in line with previous reports, the distance between the dipole sources of D1 and D5 in the somatosensory cortex (S1) was smaller in patients with FHD, suggesting disruption of homuncular finger representations in S1. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings may imply that abnormality of motor organization in focal hand dystonia arises principally only during activation, when abnormal somatosensory representations are functionally integrated.


Subject(s)
Dystonic Disorders/pathology , Dystonic Disorders/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Hand , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Brain Mapping , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Female , Hand/innervation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Principal Component Analysis , Psychomotor Performance , Pyramidal Tracts/physiopathology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
2.
Neurology ; 74(9): 728-35, 2010 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20194911

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study rapid-onset central motor plasticity, and its relationship to motor impairment and CNS injury in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, motor plasticity was examined neurophysiologically and behaviorally in 22 patients with moderately severe (median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 2.5 [0-6]) stable MS and matched healthy controls. First, plasticity was assessed using paired associative stimulation (PAS), a protocol modeling long-term synaptic potentiation in human cortex. PAS combines repetitive electric nerve stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the contralateral motor cortex. Second, motor learning was tested by a force production task. Motor impairment was assessed by functional tests. CNS injury was evaluated by obtaining normalized N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA/Cr) spectra using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and by the corticomuscular latency (CML) to the abductor pollicis brevis muscle as tested by TMS. RESULTS: Patients with MS performed worse than controls in functional motor tests, CMLs were prolonged, and NAA/Cr was decreased. PAS-induced enhancement of corticospinal excitability and training-induced increments of motor performance were comparable between patients with MS and controls. Neither PAS-induced plasticity nor motor learning performance correlated with motor impairment or measures of CNS injury. Patients with high CNS injury and good motor performance did not differ significantly from those with high CNS injury and poor motor performance with respect to PAS-induced plasticity and motor learning success. CONCLUSIONS: Despite motor impairment and CNS injury in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), rapid-onset motor plasticity is comparable to that in healthy subjects. Compensation of MS-related CNS injury is unlikely to be constrained by insufficient rapid-onset neuroplasticity.


Subject(s)
Motor Activity/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiopathology , Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive/physiopathology , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/physiopathology , Neuronal Plasticity , Pyramidal Tracts/physiopathology , Adult , Aspartic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Aspartic Acid/metabolism , Creatine/metabolism , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Learning/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...