Universal Pediatric Suicide Risk Screening in a Health Care System: 90,000 Patient Encounters.

BACKGROUND: Suicidal behavior is increasing among US youths. Contact with the health care system is common in the months before suicide. OBJECTIVE: To assess the characteristics of suicide risk among youths presenting for health care, universal screening results from a large hospital system were analyzed. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool administered to patients aged 10-17 years in a hospital system including an emergency department, inpatient medical units, and primary care clinics was conducted. Demographic and clinical data from 3 years of encounters were analyzed. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 91,580 pediatric encounters, predominantly white Hispanic and women, with one third speaking Spanish. Across health care settings, 2.9% of encounters produced positive suicide risk screens, with the highest rate in the emergency department (8.5%). Acute positive screens, indicating imminent risk for suicidal behavior, accounted for 0.3% of all encounters. Approximately one-fourth (27.6%) of encounters for psychiatric presenting problems screened positive compared with 2.3% for nonpsychiatric encounters. Higher rates of positive screens were present among encounters for psychiatric presenting problems across all settings. Positive screens were less common among preteen (1.8%) than adolescent (3.1%) encounters (χ2 = 65.50, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Universal screening detected suicide risk in approximately 3% of pediatric health care encounters. Screening identified risk in encounters among preteen and adolescent patients, with a higher prevalence of positive screens in encounters for youths presenting with psychiatric problems and for emergency department visits. Acute positive screens were rare, occurring in less than half of 1 percent of encounters.

Development and Implementation of a Universal Suicide Risk Screening Program in a Safety-Net Hospital System.

BACKGROUND: Many individuals who die by suicide present for nonbehavioral health care prior to death. The risk is often undetected. Universal suicide screening in health care may improve risk recognition. A quality improvement project involving a universal suicide screening program was designed and developed in a large safety-net health care system. METHODS: The steps in developing and implementing this quality improvement program were gathering intelligence, examining resources, designing the screening program, creating a clinical response, constructing an electronic health record screening protocol, clinical workforce education, and program implementation. This project used the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, Clinical Practice Screener-Recent, and a preliminary clinical decision support system. RESULTS: Prevalence data on suicide risk levels are provided for 328,064 adult encounters from the first six months of the screening program. Approximately half of the screens were completed in the outpatient clinics, more than 40% in the emergency department (ED), and slightly less than 5% in the hospital inpatient units. In the ED, 6.3% of the screens were positive, as were 1.6% in the inpatient units, and 2.1% in the outpatient clinics. The odds of a positive suicide screening in the ED was 4.29 times higher than the inpatient units and 3.13 times higher than the outpatient clinics. CONCLUSION: A new quality improvement program for universal suicide screening was successfully implemented in a large safety-net health care system. The burden to the system from universal screening was not overwhelming and was managed effectively through thoughtful allocation of clinical resources.