Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urol Case Rep ; 45: 102250, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36248779

ABSTRACT

Urethral strictures are an uncommon pathology in women that present novel challenges in diagnosis and treatment. We present a case of a 35 year-old female who presented with a 9 year history of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who was found to have a distal urethral stricture. Though rare, urethral strictures should be considered on the differential for women suffering from chronic LUTS. There are many potential treatment options, and stricturotomy may be considered as a definitive management option without need for flaps or grafts with urethroplasty.

2.
J Surg Res ; 264: 107-116, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33799119

ABSTRACT

TRIAL DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Intraoperative errors correlate with surgeon skill and skill declines with intervals of inactivity. The goals of this research were to identify the optimal virtual reality (VR) warm-up curriculum to prime a surgeon's technical skill and validate benefit in the operating room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgeons were randomized to receive six trial sessions of a designated set of VR modules on the da Vinci Skills Simulator to identify optimal VR warm-up curricula to prime technical skill. After performing their curricula, warm-up effect was assessed based on performance on a criterion task. The optimal warm-up curriculum was chosen from the group with the best task time and video review-based technical skill. Robot-assisted surgery-experienced surgeons were then recruited to either receive or not receive warm-up before surgery. Skill in the first 15 min of surgery was assessed by blinded surgeon and crowdworker review as well as tool motion metrics. The intervention was performing VR warm-up before human robot-assisted surgery. Warm-up effect was measured using objective performance metrics and video review using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills tool. Linear mixed effects models with a random intercept for each surgeon and nonparametric modified Friedman tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: The group performing only a Running Suture task on the simulator was on average 31.3 s faster than groups performing other simulation tasks and had the highest Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills scores from 41 surgeons who participated. This was chosen as the optimal curriculum. Thereafter, 34 surgeons completed 347 surgeries with corresponding video and tool motion data. No statistically significant differences in skill were observed with the warm-up intervention. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a robotic VR warm-up before performing the early stages of surgery does not impact the technical skill of the surgeon.


Subject(s)
High Fidelity Simulation Training/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/education , Surgeons/education , Virtual Reality , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Curriculum , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Male , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Preoperative Period , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , User-Computer Interface
3.
JSLS ; 22(4)2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30524184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The uses of robotics in surgery were hypothesized as far back as 1967, but it took nearly 30 years and the nation's largest agency, the Department of Defense, in conjunction with innovative startups and established research agencies to complete the first fully functional multipurpose surgical robot. Currently, the most prominently available multipurpose robotic surgery system with US Food and Drug Administration approval is Intuitive Surgical Inc.'s da Vinci Surgical System, which is found in operating rooms across the globe. Although now ubiquitous for minimally invasive surgery, early surgical robot prototypes were specialty focused. Originally, multipurpose robotic systems were intended for long-distance trauma surgery in battlefield settings. While there were impressive feats of telesurgery, the marketable focus has veered from this goal. Initially developed through SRI International and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, surgical robotics reached private industry through two major competitors, who later merged. METHODS: A thorough search of PubMed, Clinical Key, EBSCO, Ovid, ProQuest, and industry manufacturers' websites yielded 62 relevant articles, of which 51 were evaluated in this review. CONCLUSION: We analyzed the literature and referred to primary sources by conducting interviews with present and historical leaders in the field to yield a detailed chronology of surgical robotics development. As minimally invasive robotic procedures are becoming the standard of care, it is crucial to comprehensively document their historical context and importance as an emerging and evolving discipline.


Subject(s)
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/history , Robotic Surgical Procedures/history , Robotics/history , Telemedicine/history , Animals , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/standards , Robotic Surgical Procedures/standards , Robotics/standards , Standard of Care , Telemedicine/standards , Virtual Reality
4.
JSLS ; 22(1)2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29618918

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are several different commercially available virtual-reality robotic simulators, but very little comparative data. We compared the face and content validity of 3 robotic surgery simulators and their pricing and availability. METHODS: Fifteen participants completed one task on each of the following: dV-Trainer (dVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA), da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA), and RobotiX Mentor (RM; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA). Participants completed previously validated face and content validity questionnaires and a demographics questionnaire. Statistical analysis was then performed on the scores. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 29.6 (range, 25-41) years. Most were surgical trainees, having performed a mean of 8.6 robotic primary surgeries. For face validity, ANOVA showed a significant difference favoring the dVSS over the dVT (P = .001), and no significant difference between the RM, dVSS, and dVT. Content validity revealed similar results, with a significant difference between the dVSS and dVT (P = .021), a trend toward a difference between the RM and dVT (P = .092), and no difference between the dVSS and RM (P = .99). CONCLUSION: All simulators demonstrated evidence of face and content validity, with significantly higher scores for the dVSS; it is also the least costly ($80,000 for the simulator), although it is frequently unavailable because of intra-operative use. The dVT and RM have similar face and content validity, are slightly more expensive, and are readily available.


Subject(s)
Robotic Surgical Procedures/education , Simulation Training/methods , Virtual Reality , Adult , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...