The Impact of the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis on Communication and Quality of Life: Insights From a Community of Stroke and Brain Trauma Survivors.

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has led to stay-at-home orders and social distancing guidelines that have the potential to greatly impact individuals' behavior and social engagement. Adults recovering from stroke or other brain trauma, who often have communication difficulties and other long-term challenges, are a population already at risk of isolation and lower quality of life. We investigated the impact of public health guidelines and related behavioral changes on self-perceptions of communication abilities and psychosocial factors in this population. Method The Stroke Comeback Center, a community-based center for stroke and other brain trauma survivors with communication impairments, disseminated an online survey to current members to investigate changes in communication, social engagement, and quality of life. Results Participants (N = 50) reported a number of changes in their day-to-day activities that reflect the current social distancing guidelines, such as reduced outings into the community and fewer in-person conversations with those living outside one's home. Overall, feelings of connectedness to others and overall quality of life were reported to be decreased when compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas receptive language abilities and technology skills were reported to have improved. Perhaps most interestingly, certain behavioral changes (including healthy movement activities and participation in virtual programs) had specific relationships with perceived communication abilities and social engagement. Conclusions Changes in daily life resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic have had a tangible impact on self-perceived psychosocial elements (e.g., quality of life) and communication abilities among stroke and other brain trauma survivors. Clinicians and researchers may consider these perceived changes when engaging with this population as the effects of the pandemic continue and in the period of community re-entry that may follow. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14830881.

The SCIRehab project: treatment time spent in SCI rehabilitation. Speech-language pathology treatment time during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the SCIRehab project.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Following spinal cord injury (SCI), speech-language pathologists (SLPs) perform assessments and provide treatment for swallowing, motor speech, voice, and cognitive-communication disorders that result from the SCI and/or co-occurring brain injuries. This paper describes the nature and distribution of speech-language pathology (SLP) activities delivered during inpatient SCI rehabilitation and discusses predictors (patient and injury characteristics) of the amount of time spent in specific SLP treatment activities. METHODS: Six rehabilitation centers enrolled 600 patients with traumatic SCI for an observational study of acute inpatient rehabilitation treatment (SCIRehab). SLPs documented the details of assessment and treatment and time spent on each of a set of specific SLP activities during each patient encounter. Patterns of time use are described for all patients by neurological injury category. Ordinary least squares stepwise regression models are used to identify patient and injury characteristics predictive of treatment time in the specific SLP activities identified. RESULTS: SLP consults were requested for 40% of SCIRehab patients. Fifty-seven percent of these patients received intense therapy (defined as more than five sessions during the rehabilitation stay); the remainder received primarily evaluation or less intense services (one to five sessions). The patients who participated in intense treatment received a mean total of 16.1 hours (range 2.5-105.2 hours, standard deviation (SD) 16.5, median 9.7 hours) of SLP; significant differences were seen in the amount of time spent in each activity among neurological injury groups. Cognitive-communication and swallowing therapy were the most common SLP activities. Patients with motor levels of injury at C1-C4 spent the highest percentage of their therapy time working on swallowing therapy while patients with low tetraplegia and paraplegia, and those classified as AIS D (regardless of motor level of injury) focused the greatest percentage of time on cognitive-communication work. Patient and injury characteristics explained a portion of the variation in time spent on cognitive-communication therapy but did not explain the variation in time spent on swallowing and other SLP treatment activities. CONCLUSION: The need for swallowing and cognitive treatment by SLP is common during inpatient rehabilitation due to dysfunction resulting from use of artificial airways and feeding approaches, as well as secondary brain injuries. The large amount of variability seen in SLP treatment time, which is not explained well by patient and injury characteristics, sets the stage for future analyses to associate treatments with outcomes.

SCIRehab Project series: the speech language pathology taxonomy.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes research for speech language pathology (SLP) interventions for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SSC) rehabilitation in the US is difficult because of the lack of a treatment classification system (taxonomy). OBJECTIVE: To describe a taxonomy developed by speech language pathologists (SLPs) to examine the effects of SLP interventions on SCI rehabilitation outcomes. METHODS: The SCIRehab study uses practice-based evidence, a rigorous observational methodology that examines treatment processes without specifying or requiring specific therapeutic interventions. Speech language pathology lead clinicians and researchers at 6 US SCI centers developed a detailed SLP taxonomy documentation process that is comprehensive of SLP interventions for patients with SCI. RESULTS: The SLP taxonomy consists of 7 intervention categories that address deficits (speech production for patients with artificial airway, motor speech and voice, swallowing, cognitive-communication, and communication) and the associated exercises and tasks that patients perform. Time is recorded for each category, and supplementary information focuses on cueing needs and family involvement that helps to describe and guide intervention selection. The SCIRehab project is enrolling 1,500 patients with acute traumatic SCI at 6 inpatient rehabilitation facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Speech language pathology taxonomy information is being captured for the SCIRehab patients who are referred for SLP services; this may be the first attempt to document the many details of the SLP rehabilitation process for patients with SCI in the US.

The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy.

This paper presents results from a study conducted at the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center (RERC) on Telerehabilitation at the National Rehabilitation Hospital. The study was designed to measure performance by brain-injured subjects, with medical diagnoses of stroke or traumatic brain injury, on a standardized Speech-Language Pathology evaluation conducted in both face-to-face and videoconference-based telerehabilitation settings. The Story Retelling Procedure (SRP), which measures connected language production and comprehension of spoken narratives, was administered to each subject in both settings. The primary objectives of this study were to: (1) compare communication as measured by the SRP between experimental settings, and (2) determine if subject variables (such as age, education, technology experience or gender) had an effect on performance differences between settings. The rationale was that any difference in this aspect of performance must be identified and characterized before this mode of intervention can be used clinically. Across all subjects (n = 40), no significant difference (p > 0.05) was found between SRP performance measured in the two settings. Additionally, variables including age, education, technology experience, and gender did not significantly affect the difference between performance in the two settings. Overall, subjects reported a high level of acceptance of videoconferencing with 34 subjects responding "yes," 4 responding "no," and 2 responding "maybe" when asked if they would use videoconferencing again to talk to a clinician. Results of this study confirm the potential for SLP treatment using videoconferencing and indicate a need for continued research in the field.