Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 9(1): 14328, 2019 10 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31586152

ABSTRACT

Based on classic clonogenic assay, it is accepted by the scientific community that, whatever the energy, the relative biological effectiveness of X-rays is equal to 1. However, although X-ray beams are widely used in diagnosis, interventional medicine and radiotherapy, comparisons of their energies are scarce. We therefore assessed in vitro the effects of low- and high-energy X-rays using Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by performing clonogenic assay, measuring viability/mortality, counting γ-H2AX foci, studying cell proliferation and cellular senescence by flow cytometry and by performing gene analysis on custom arrays. Taken together, excepted for γ-H2AX foci counts, these experiments systematically show more adverse effects of high energy X-rays, while the relative biological effectiveness of photons is around 1, whatever the quality of the X-ray beam. These results strongly suggest that multiparametric analysis should be considered in support of clonogenic assay.


Subject(s)
Histones/radiation effects , Photons/adverse effects , Relative Biological Effectiveness , X-Rays/adverse effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Colony-Forming Units Assay , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded/radiation effects , Genetic Markers/radiation effects , Histones/genetics , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Humans , Linear Energy Transfer , Proof of Concept Study
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...