Who was at risk of trauma-related injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic? A retrospective study from a level 1 trauma centre in Switzerland.

INTRODUCTION: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, increasingly strict restrictions were imposed on the activities of the Swiss population, with a peak from 21 March to 27 April 2020. Changes in trauma patterns during the pandemic and the lockdown have been described in various studies around the world, and highlight some particularly exposed groups of people. The objective of this study was to assess changes in trauma-related presentations to the emergency department (ED) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, as compared to the same period in the previous year, with a particular focus on vulnerable populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All trauma-related admissions to our ED in the first half of 2019 and 2020 were included. Patient demographics, trauma mechanism, affected body region, injury severity and discharge type were extracted from our hospital information system. Trauma subpopulations, such as interpersonal violence, self-inflicted trauma, geriatric trauma and sports-related trauma were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 5839 ED presentations were included in our study, of which 39.9% were female. Median age was 40 years (interquartile range: 27-60). In comparison to 2019, there was a 15.5% decrease in trauma-related ED presentations in the first half of 2020. This decrease was particularly marked in the 2-month March/April period, with a drop of 36.8%. In 2020, there was a reduction in injuries caused by falls of less than 3 metres or by mechanical force. There was a marked decrease in sports-related trauma and an increase in injuries related to pedal cycles. Geriatric trauma, self-harm and assault-related injuries remained stable. CONCLUSION: This study described changes in trauma patterns and highlighted populations at risk of trauma during the pandemic in Switzerland in the context of previous international studies.These results may contribute to resource management in a future pandemic.

Utility and limitations of patient-adjusted D-dimer cut-off levels for diagnosis of venous thromboembolism-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To systematically assess test performance of patient-adapted D-dimer cut-offs for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: Systematic review and analysis of articles published in PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases. Investigations assessing patient-adjusted D-dimer thresholds for the exclusion of VTE were included. A hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model was used to assess diagnostic accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 score. RESULTS: A total of 68 studies involving 141,880 patients met the inclusion criteria. The standard cut-off revealed a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-0.99) and specificity of 0.23 (95% CI 0.16-0.31). Sensitivity was comparable to the standard cut-off for age-adjustment (0.97 [95% CI 0.96-0.98]) and YEARS algorithm (0.98 [95% CI 0.91-1.00]) but lower for pretest probability (PTP)-adjusted (0.95 [95% CI 0.89-0.98) and COVID-19-adapted thresholds (0.93 [95% CI 0.82-0.98]). Specificity was significantly higher across all adjustment strategies (age: 0.43 [95% CI 0.36-0.50]; PTP: 0.63 [95% CI 0.51-0.73]; YEARS algorithm: 0.65 [95% CI 0.39-0.84]; and COVID-19: 0.51 [95% CI 0.40-0.63]). The YEARS algorithm provided the best negative likelihood ratio (0.03 [95% CI 0.01-0.15]), followed by age-adjusted (both 0.07 [95% CI 0.05-0.09]), PTP (0.08 [95% CI 0.04-0.17), and COVID-19-adjusted thresholds (0.13 [95% CI 0.05-0.32]). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that adjustment of D-dimer thresholds to patient-specific factors is safe and embodies considerable potential for reduction of imaging. However, robustness, safety, and efficiency vary considerably among different adjustment strategies with a high degree of heterogeneity.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcome following traumatic brain injury: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple and routinely performed hematological parameter; however, studies on NLR as a prognostic tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) have yielded contradictory results. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items in the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines 2020. Electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. The population consisted of TBI patients in the absence of moderate and severe extracranial injury. Day 1 NLR was taken for the analysis. The outcomes evaluated were mortality and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). No restrictions were placed on the language, year and country of publication, and duration of follow-up. Animal studies were excluded from the study. Studies, where inadequate data were reported for the outcomes, were included in the qualitative synthesis but excluded from the quantitative synthesis. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane RoBANS risk of bias tool. Results: We retrieved 7213 citations using the search strategy and 2097 citations were excluded based on the screening of the title and abstract. Full text was retrieved for 40 articles and subjected to the eligibility criteria, of which 28 were excluded from the study. Twelve studies were eligible for the synthesis of the systematic review while seven studies qualified for the meta-analysis. The median score of the articles was 8/9 as per NOS. The risk of selection bias was low in all the studies while the risk of detection bias was high in all except one study. Ten studies were conducted on adult patients, while two studies reported pediatric TBI. A meta-analysis for GOS showed that high NLR predicted unfavorable outcomes at ≥6 months with a mean difference of -5.18 (95% confidence interval: -10.04, -0.32); P = 0.04; heterogeneity (I2), being 98%. The effect estimates for NLR and mortality were a mean difference of -3.22 (95% confidence interval: -7.12, 0.68), P = 0.11, and an I2 of 85%. Meta-analysis for Area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic of the included studies showed good predictive power of NLR in predicting outcomes following TBI with AUC 0.706 (95% CI: 0.582-0.829). Conclusion: A higher admission NLR predicts an increased mortality risk and unfavorable outcomes following TBI. However, future research will likely address the existing gaps.

Major trauma during COVID-19 in a level 1 trauma centre in Switzerland - a cohort study comparing the years 2020 and 2019.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated restrictions may have modified the activities of the Swiss population and thus altered trauma patterns. MATERIALS AND PATIENTS: All adult patients with major trauma admitted to our institution in 2019 and 2020 were assessed using the Injury Severity Score (ISS), by body region involved, type of injury, age, admission to an intensive care unit and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: In 2020, 454 patients with major trauma were admitted to our institution, 17% fewer than in the previous year. The drop in the number of major trauma patients proceeded with and overlapped both the first and second peaks in incidence of the pandemic and the associated restrictions. The median ISS was higher in 2020 (25, interquartile range [IQR] 17-26.5) than in 2019 (22, IQR 16-26, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in body region involved, type of injury or age (p >0.05). In 2020, a higher percentage of patients were admitted to an intensive care unit (86.5% vs 77.7%, p <0.001) and died within 30 days (8.8% vs 5.0%, p = 0.015). The 30-day mortality was higher in 2020 than in 2019, with an odds ratio of 1.80 (95% confidence interval 1.04-3.10, p= 0.036) after adjustment for the following potential confounders: ISS, age, gender and type of injury. CONCLUSION: In the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer patients with major trauma were admitted to our institution. However, the patients admitted were more severely injured and more often died within 30 days. Understanding the differences in injury patterns and admissions in major trauma patients under special conditions - such as a pandemic - could help to allocate rare resources adequately.

Tram, rail, bicycle: An unhappy triad? Rising incidence and resource consumption of tramline-associated bicycling accidents in Bern, Switzerland.

Bicycle traffic and the number of accidents have been increasing in Switzerland in recent years. However, little is known about specific types of bicycling accidents - such as tramline-associated bicycling accidents (TABA) - that are potentially avoidable. This retrospective single center study of emergency department (ED) consultations analyzed TABA in the city of Bern, Switzerland. We analyzed the medical records of adult patients who presented to the ED after any bicycle accident. Patient and consultation characteristics were extracted. Incidence, important characteristics and ED resource consumption of TABA were compared with bicycle accidents that did not involve tramlines (BA). Furthermore, injury patterns and predictors of resource consumption were determined in TABA. We included a total of 298 TABA and 2351 BA over the 5.6-year study period. TABA accounted for 11.2 % of all bicycling accidents. Descriptive analysis revealed a significant increase between 2013 (lowest) and 2016 (highest) of 33.0 % in the total number of BA and 132 % in the total number of TABA. Compared to BA, TABA patients were significantly older, more often female, had a less urgent triage, and less often needed resuscitation bay treatment, hospitalization or ICU-admission (all p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, TABA were associated with greater needs for ED resources. Most TABA injuries were to limbs (70.5 %) or the head (53.0 %), including intracranial hemorrhage (2.3 %). The radiological work-up consumed most of the resources (37.5 %), followed by physicians' work (25.8 %). Statistically significant predictors of ED resource consumption in TABA were age, triage, resuscitation bay treatment, injuries to head/clavicle, and intoxication. One out of ten patients was intoxicated. Although TABA is associated with less severe trauma than BA, it bears the risk of significant morbidity and high ED resource needs. Intoxications contribute to this problem. Our findings underline the need for preventive measures to reduce TABA in the future.

Fluid Overload and Mortality in Adult Critical Care Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

OBJECTIVE: Fluid administration in combination with the increase in vasopermeability induced by critical illness often results in significant fluid overload in critically ill patients. Recent research indicates that mortality is increased in patients who have received large volumes of fluids. We have systematically reviewed and synthesized the evidence on fluid overload and mortality in critically ill patients and have performed a meta-analysis of available data from observational studies. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library databases. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All studies were eligible that investigated the impact of fluid overload (defined by weight gain > 5%) or positive cumulative fluid balance on mortality in adult critical care patients. We excluded animal studies and trials in pediatric populations (age < 16 years old), pregnant women, noncritically ill patients, very specific subpopulations of critically ill patients, and on early goal-directed therapy. Randomized controlled trials were only evaluated in the section on systematic review. Assessment followed the Cochrane/meta-analysis of observational trials in epidemiology guidelines for systematic reviews. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 31 observational and three randomized controlled trials including 31,076 ICU patients met the inclusion criteria. Only observational studies were included in the meta-analysis. Fluid overload and cumulative fluid balance were both associated with pooled mortality: after 3 days of ICU stay, adjusted relative risk for fluid overload was 8.83 (95% CI, 4.03-19.33), and for cumulative fluid balance 2.15 (95% CI, 1.51-3.07), at any time point, adjusted relative risk for fluid overload was 2.79 (95% CI, 1.55-5.00) and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.15-1.69) for cumulative fluid balance. Fluid overload was associated with mortality in patients with both acute kidney injury (adjusted relative risk, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.75-2.98) and surgery (adjusted relative risk, 6.17; 95% CI, 4.81-7.97). Cumulative fluid balance was linked to mortality in patients with sepsis (adjusted relative risk, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.39-1.98), acute kidney injury (adjusted relative risk, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.30-5.30), and respiratory failure (adjusted relative risk, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43). The risk of mortality increased by a factor of 1.19 (95% CI, 1.11-1.28) per liter increase in positive fluid balance. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting adjusted risk estimates suggests that fluid overload and positive cumulative fluid balance are associated with increased mortality in a general population and defined subgroups of critically ill patients.

Increased S-100 B levels are associated with fractures and soft tissue injury in multiple trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: S-100 B protein was identified as a biomarker for traumatic brain injury, but studies suggest that extracranial injuries may also lead to increased S-100 B serum levels. In this study, we aim to quantify the impact of injury patterns on S-100 B levels in patients with suspected multiple trauma. METHODS: Patients with suspected multiple trauma treated at a Level 1 Trauma centre in Switzerland were included in this retrospective patient chart review. Extent of injuries and severity was assessed and S-100 B levels on admission measured. Potential predictors of increased S-100 B levels (>0.2 µg/L) were identified through uni- and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: In total, 1,338 patients with suspected multiple trauma were included. Multivariable logistic regression showed a significant association with increased S-100 B levels in long bone fracture (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3-4.1, p = 0.004), non-long bone fracture (OR 3.0, 95% CI: 2.2-4.3, p<0.001), thoracic injury (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.2, p<0.001), and deep tissue injury/wounds (OR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4-2.6, p<0.001). Head trauma with intracerebral bleeding was only weakly associated (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5, p = 0.01) and head trauma without intracranial bleeding was not associated with an increased S-100 B protein level (p = 0.71). Trauma severity was also related to increased S-100 B levels (OR per ISS: 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.1, p<0.001). S-100 B levels <0.57 µg/L had a high diagnostic value to rule out in-hospital mortality (negative predictive value: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.98-1.00). CONCLUSION: Fractures and thoracic injuries appeared as main factors associated with increased S-100 B levels. Head injury may only play a minor role in S-100 B protein elevation in multiple trauma patients. A normal S-100 B has a good negative predictive value for in-hospital mortality. S100-B levels were associated with trauma severity and might thus be of use as a prognostic marker in trauma patients.

Renal Function-Adjusted D-Dimer Levels in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosing thromboembolic disease typically includes D-dimer testing and use of clinical scores in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability. However, renal dysfunction is often observed in patients with thromboembolic disease and was previously shown to be associated with increased D-dimer levels. We seek to validate previously suggested estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels. Furthermore, we strive to explore whether the type of renal dysfunction affects estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer test characteristics. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective data analysis from electronic healthcare records of all emergency department patients admitted for suspected thromboembolic disease. SETTING: Tertiary care academic hospital. SUBJECTS: Exclusion criteria were as follows: age less than 16 years old, patients with active bleeding, and/or incomplete records. INTERVENTIONS: Test characteristics of previously suggested that estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels (> 333 µg/L [estimated glomerular filtration rate, > 60 mL/min/1.73 m], > 1,306 µg/L [30-60 mL/min/1.73 m], and > 1,663 µg/L [< 30 mL/min/1.73 m]) were validated and compared with the conventional D-dimer cutoff level of 500 µg/L. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 14,477 patients were included in the final analysis, with 467 patients (3.5%) diagnosed with thromboembolic disease. Renal dysfunction was observed in 1,364 (9.4%) of the total population. When adjusted D-dimer levels were applied, test characteristics remained stable: negative predictive value (> 99%), sensitivity (91.2% vs 93.4%), and specificity (42.7% vs 50.7%) when compared with the conventional D-dimer cutoff level to rule out thromboembolic disease (< 500 µg/L). Comparable characteristics were also observed when adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels were applied in patients with acute kidney injury (negative predictive value, 98.8%; sensitivity, 95.8%; specificity, 39.2%) and/or "acute on chronic" renal dysfunction (negative predictive value, 98.0%; sensitivity, 92.9%; specificity, 48.5%). CONCLUSIONS: D-Dimer cutoff levels adjusted for renal dysfunction appear feasible and safe assessing thromboembolic disease in critically ill patients. Furthermore, adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels seem reliable in patients with acute kidney injury and "acute on chronic" renal dysfunction. In patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m, the false-positive rate can be reduced when estimated glomerular filtration rate-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels are applied.

[Sequelae of hernia repair: What are the key issues?] / Folgezustände nach Hernienchirurgie: Was ist zu beachten?

Sequelae of hernia repair: What are the key issues? Abstract. Since hernia repair is increasingly performed as day case surgery, general practitioners are becoming progressively involved in postoperative care. Early sequelae must be differentiated from late sequelae of hernia repair. Hematomas, seromas and acute pain are frequent early postoperative problems, while at a later stage recurrence and potentially chronifying pain are of importance. The focus of this review is on aftercare, frequent postoperative problems and their therapeutic options.

Mechanisms of ATP Release by Inflammatory Cells.

Extracellular nucleotides (e.g., ATP, ADP, UTP, UDP) released by inflammatory cells interact with specific purinergic P2 type receptors to modulate their recruitment and activation. The focus of this review is on stimuli and mechanisms of extracellular nucleotide release and its consequences during inflammation. Necrosis leads to non-specific release of nucleotides, whereas specific release mechanisms include vesicular exocytosis and channel-mediated release via connexin or pannexin hemichannels. These release mechanisms allow stimulated inflammatory cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, and endothelial cells to fine-tune autocrine/paracrine responses during acute and chronic inflammation. Key effector functions of inflammatory cells are therefore regulated by purinergic signaling in acute and chronic diseases, making extracellular nucleotide release a promising target for the development of new therapies.