Comprehensive NGS profiling to enable detection of ALK gene rearrangements and MET amplifications in non-small cell lung cancer.

Introduction: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is currently widely used for biomarker studies and molecular profiling to identify concurrent alterations that can lead to the better characterization of a tumor's molecular landscape. However, further evaluation of technical aspects related to the detection of gene rearrangements and copy number alterations is warranted. Methods: There were 12 ALK rearrangement-positive tumor specimens from patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously detected via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and an RNA-based NGS assay, and 26 MET high gene copy number (GCN) cases detected by FISH, selected for this retrospective study. All 38 pre-characterized cases were reassessed utilizing the PGDx™ elio™ tissue complete assay, a 505 gene targeted NGS panel, to evaluate concordance with these conventional diagnostic techniques. Results: The detection of ALK rearrangements using the DNA-based NGS assay demonstrated excellent sensitivity with the added benefit of characterizing gene fusion partners and genomic breakpoints. MET copy number alterations were also detected; however, some discordances were observed likely attributed to differences in algorithm, reporting thresholds and gene copy number state. TMB was also assessed by the assay and correlated to the presence of NSCLC driver alterations and was found to be significantly lower in cases with NGS-confirmed canonical driver mutations compared with those without (p=0.0019). Discussion: Overall, this study validates NGS as an accurate approach for detecting structural variants while also highlighting the need for further optimization to enable harmonization across methodologies for amplifications.

Automated next-generation profiling of genomic alterations in human cancers.

The lack of validated, distributed comprehensive genomic profiling assays for patients with cancer inhibits access to precision oncology treatment. To address this, we describe elio tissue complete, which has been FDA-cleared for examination of 505 cancer-related genes. Independent analyses of clinically and biologically relevant sequence changes across 170 clinical tumor samples using MSK-IMPACT, FoundationOne, and PCR-based methods reveals a positive percent agreement of >97%. We observe high concordance with whole-exome sequencing for evaluation of tumor mutational burden for 307 solid tumors (Pearson r = 0.95) and comparison of the elio tissue complete microsatellite instability detection approach with an independent PCR assay for 223 samples displays a positive percent agreement of 99%. Finally, evaluation of amplifications and translocations against DNA- and RNA-based approaches exhibits >98% negative percent agreement and positive percent agreement of 86% and 82%, respectively. These methods provide an approach for pan-solid tumor comprehensive genomic profiling with high analytical performance.

Next-Generation Sequencing Concordance Analysis of Comprehensive Solid Tumor Profiling between a Centralized Specialty Laboratory and the Decentralized Personal Genome Diagnostics elio Tissue Complete Kitted Solution.

Genomic tumor profiling by next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for large-scale tumor testing to inform targeted cancer therapies and immunotherapies, and to identify patients for clinical trials. These tests are often underutilized in patients with late-stage solid tumors and are typically performed in centralized specialty laboratories, thereby limiting access to these complex tests. Personal Genome Diagnostics Inc., elio tissue complete NGS solution is a comprehensive DNA-to-report kitted assay and bioinformatics solution. Comparison of 147 unique specimens from >20 tumor types was performed using the elio tissue complete solution and Foundation Medicine's FoundationOne test, which is of similar size and gene content. The analytical performance of all genomic variant types was evaluated. In general, the overall mutational profile is highly concordant between the two assays, with agreement in sequence variants reported between panels demonstrating >95% positive percentage agreement for single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions in clinically actionable genes. Both copy number alterations and gene translocations showed 80% to 83% positive percentage agreement, whereas tumor mutation burden and microsatellite status showed a high level of concordance across a range of mutation loads and tumor types. The Personal Genome Diagnostics Inc., elio tissue complete assay is comparable to the FoundationOne test and will allow more laboratories to offer a diagnostic NGS assay in house, which will ultimately reduce time to result and increase the number of patients receiving molecular genomic profiling and personalized treatment.

Characterization of tumor mutation burden, PD-L1 and DNA repair genes to assess relationship to immune checkpoint inhibitors response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have expanded treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, there are limited predictive biomarkers for response to ICIs in this indication, with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status demonstrating little predictive utility in mRCC. While predictive of ICI response in other tumor types, the utility of tumor mutation burden (TMB) in mRCC is unclear. Here, we assess TMB, loss of antigen presentation genes and PD-L1 status correlated with outcomes to ICI treatment in mRCC. METHODS: Tumor samples from 34 patients with mRCC treated with ICI therapy at Duke Cancer Institute were retrospectively evaluated using Personal Genome Diagnostics elio tissue complete (RUO version), a tumor genomic profiling assay for somatic variants, TMB, microsatellite status and genomic status of antigen presentation genes. Tumor samples were also analyzed with the Dako 28-8 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assay. Deidentified clinical information was extracted from the medical record, and tumor response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) V.1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Patients were stratified by overall response following ICI therapy and designated as progressive disease (PD; n=18) or disease control groups (DC; n=16). TMB scores ranged from 0.36 to 12.24 mutations/Mb (mean 2.83 mutations/Mb) with no significant difference between the PD and DC groups (3.01 vs 2.63 mutations/Mb, respectively; p=0.7682). Interestingly, 33% of PD patients displayed loss of heterozygosity of major histocompatibility complex class I genes (LOH-MHC) vs 6% of DC patients. Nine of 34 samples were PD-L1-positive (4 in the PD group; 5 in the DC group), suggesting no correlation between PD-L1 expression and response to ICI therapy. Notably, the DC group displayed an enrichment of mutations in DNA repair genes (p=0.04), with 68.8% exhibiting at least one mutated homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related gene compared with only 38.9% of the PD group (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, neither TMB nor PD-L1 correlated with ICI response and TMB was not significantly associated with PD-L1 expression. The higher incidence of LOH-MHC in PD group suggests that loss of antigen presentation may restrict response to ICIs. Separately, enrichment of HRR gene mutations in the DC group suggests potential utility in predicting ICI response and a potential therapeutic target, warranting future studies.