Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 188: 169-183, 2024 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970844

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the optimal follow-up schedule after endometrial cancer is lacking. The study aim was to compare satisfaction with care between women who received reduced follow-up care and women who received usual guideline-directed follow-up care for three years after surgery. METHODS: The ENSURE (ENdometrial cancer SURvivors' follow-up carE) trial was a non-inferiority randomized controlled multicenter trial in 42 hospitals in the Netherlands. The intervention arm received reduced follow-up care (4 visits/3 years), while the control group received usual follow-up care (8-11 visits/3 years). Primary outcome was overall satisfaction with care, PSQIII score, over three years follow-up, with a non-inferiority margin of 6. Mixed linear regression, intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (presented below) were used. RESULTS: Among 316 women included, overall satisfaction with care was not lower in the reduced follow-up (mean 82; SD = 15) compared with the usual follow-up group (mean 80; SD = 15) group (B = 1.80(-2.09;5.68)). At 6, 12 and 36 months, more women (93/94/90%) in the reduced follow-up group were satisfied with their follow-up schedule than in the usual follow-up group (79/79/82%; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Women with low-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer who received reduced follow-up care were no less satisfied with their care than women receiving usual follow-up care. Compared with usual follow-up, women in the reduced follow-up group had fewer clinical visits and, at the same time, more often reported being satisfied with their follow-up schedule. Findings suggest that reduced follow-up care may be the new standard, but should be tailored to meet additional needs where indicated.

2.
Case Rep Womens Health ; 21: e00105, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30906696

ABSTRACT

Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) often consists of an excisional procedure. However, less invasive treatment methods have been explored, such as topical treatment with imiquimod cream. Imiquimod has been proven to be effective in the regression of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) and vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN). Previous studies have investigated the effect of imiquimod in CIN and showed well tolerated adverse effects. During a current study in the Netherlands, a number of adverse events have occurred. This case series presents a selection of these. Gynaecologists should be aware of the possible adverse effects of topical treatment with imiquimod cream.

3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 146(3): 449-456, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28645428

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a diagnostic laparoscopy prior to primary cytoreductive surgery to prevent futile primary cytoreductive surgery (i.e. leaving >1cm residual disease) in patients suspected of advanced stage ovarian cancer. METHODS: An economic analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial in which patients suspected of advanced stage ovarian cancer who qualified for primary cytoreductive surgery were randomized to either laparoscopy or primary cytoreductive surgery. Direct medical costs from a health care perspective over a 6-month time horizon were analyzed. Health outcomes were expressed in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and utility was based on patient's response to the EQ-5D questionnaires. We primarily focused on direct medical costs based on Dutch standard prices. RESULTS: We studied 201 patients, of whom 102 were randomized to laparoscopy and 99 to primary cytoreductive surgery. No significant difference in QALYs (utility=0.01; 95% CI 0.006 to 0.02) was observed. Laparoscopy reduced the number of futile laparotomies from 39% to 10%, while its costs were € 1400 per intervention, making the overall costs of both strategies comparable (difference € -80 per patient (95% CI -470 to 300)). Findings were consistent across various sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected advanced stage ovarian cancer, a diagnostic laparoscopy reduced the number of futile laparotomies, without increasing total direct medical health care costs, or adversely affecting complications or quality of life.


Subject(s)
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/economics , Health Care Costs , Laparoscopy/economics , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical/economics , Female , Humans , Medical Futility , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/economics , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(6): 613-621, 2017 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28029317

ABSTRACT

Purpose To investigate whether initial diagnostic laparoscopy can prevent futile primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) by identifying patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer in whom > 1 cm of residual disease will be left after PCS. Patients and Methods This multicenter, randomized controlled trial was undertaken within eight gynecologic cancer centers in the Netherlands. Patients with suspected advanced-stage ovarian cancer who qualified for PCS were eligible. Participating patients were randomly assigned to either laparoscopy or PCS. Laparoscopy was used to guide selection of primary treatment: either primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery. The primary outcome was futile laparotomy, defined as a PCS with residual disease of > 1 cm. Primary analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results Between May 2011 and February 2015, 201 participants were included, of whom 102 were assigned to diagnostic laparoscopy and 99 to primary surgery. In the laparoscopy group, 63 (62%) of 102 patients underwent PCS versus 93 (94%) of 99 patients in the primary surgery group. Futile laparotomy occurred in 10 (10%) of 102 patients in the laparoscopy group versus 39 (39%) of 99 patients in the primary surgery group (relative risk, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.47; P < .001). In the laparoscopy group, three (3%) of 102 patients underwent both primary and interval surgery compared with 28 (28%) of 99 patients in the primary surgery group ( P < .001). Conclusion Diagnostic laparoscopy reduced the number of futile laparotomies in patients with suspected advanced-stage ovarian cancer. In women with a plan for PCS, these data suggest that performance of diagnostic laparoscopy first is reasonable and that if cytoreduction to < 1 cm of residual disease seems feasible, to proceed with PCS.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/surgery , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasm, Residual , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 20(1): 75-9, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26579838

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess awareness, attitudes, and current clinical experiences of gynecologists regarding imiquimod as a potential treatment modality for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 37-item questionnaire consisting of both multiple choice and open questions was sent to all Dutch gynecologists who regularly perform colposcopies in all 87 Dutch hospitals, in December 2014. The outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Gynecologists from 52 hospitals (60%) completed the questionnaire. Of the 77 respondents, 79% and 58% were aware of imiquimod for treating VAIN and CIN, respectively. Twelve and 5 respondents had used imiquimod to treat VAIN and CIN, respectively; most treatments were for intractable VAIN lesions and recurrent lesions and to avoid surgical treatment for CIN in patients with a future pregnancy wish. Most respondents reported successful treatment outcomes but frequent adverse effects. Most (96%) stated that they would consider using imiquimod to treat high-grade CIN in selected patients, but only upon additional evidence and inclusion into treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The awareness of imiquimod as a potential treatment for VAIN and CIN was limited, possibly because of the paucity of evidence regarding vaginal imiquimod efficacy, the lack of inclusion into guidelines, and the high frequency of adverse effects. Imiquimod was applied off-label in a limited number of selected patients, with good treatment results. The respondents generally had a positive attitude toward treating VAIN and CIN with imiquimod. Additional evidence on treatment efficacy and inclusion in treatment guidelines is necessary before application in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Aminoquinolines/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude of Health Personnel , Physicians , Professional Competence , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/drug therapy , Vaginal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Imiquimod , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 23(5): 890-4, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23640293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the interobserver variability of pelvic examination under anesthesia (EUA) in cervical cancer. METHODS: Subsequent patients undergoing a staging procedure under anesthesia for primary cervical cancer were enrolled in the study. All clinicians assessed "blinded" tumor size, and the involvement of vagina, parametria, sacrouterine ligaments, pelvic sidewalls, bladder, and/or rectum. Items were scored varying from 1 ("certainly no involvement"), 2 ("not sure about involvement"), to 3 ("involvement"). Each individual decided on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage; also, the urge for imaging and treatment proposal were accounted for. Final FIGO staging was obtained by consensus of the team. Investigators were classified as experienced after more than 50 EUAs. All others were classified less experienced. The free-marginal κ values between experienced and less experienced investigators were calculated for all previously mentioned items. RESULTS: Between February 2009 and December 2010, a total of 86 patients were enrolled. Among experienced investigators, a moderate interobserver agreement was found with regard to FIGO stage (free-marginal κ value of 0.49) and an excellent interobserver agreement on their proposed therapy (free-marginal κ value of 0.84). A lower level of agreement was found when comparing experienced with less experienced investigators: only a slight level of agreement on FIGO stage and a substantial agreement on their therapy proposal (free-marginal κ values of 0.03 and 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: We describe only a moderate interobserver agreement on clinical staging of patients with cervical cancer. The interobserver agreement increases in the group of experienced doctors, indicating that EUA can be learned.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Neoplasm Staging/standards , Pelvic Floor/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gynecology , Humans , International Agencies , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Obstetrics , Pelvic Floor/surgery , Prognosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...