ABSTRACT
This literature review delves into the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of surgery, exploring its evolution, applications, and technological advancements. AI, with its ability to mimic human intelligence, presents a paradigm shift in surgical practices. The review critically analyzes a broad range of research, encompassing machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and their diverse applications in preoperative planning, surgical simulation, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative analysis. Ethical, legal, and regulatory considerations, as well as challenges and future directions, are also explored. The study underscores AI's ability to revolutionize surgical visualization and its role in shaping the future of healthcare.
ABSTRACT
Esophageal cancer is a significant global health challenge, characterized by its aggressive nature and high mortality rates. The disease disproportionately affects males and ranks among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Alarming projections indicate that the prevalence of esophageal cancer is expected to surge by approximately 140% by the year 2025. This trend starkly contrasts with the anticipated decline in incidence observed for many other types of cancers. The cancer manifests primarily in two major subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, each with distinct epidemiological and biological characteristics. This review provides an in-depth exploration of the risk factors, anatomy, clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, prognosis, treatment modalities, recurrence, advancements, and emerging therapies in esophageal cancer. Additionally, preventive and early detection strategies are discussed, focusing on primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention approaches. A comprehensive understanding of esophageal cancer is vital for formulating effective management strategies and improving patient outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer, ranking among the most prevalent causes of cancer-related mortality, is an escalating global health concern. The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer are expected to surge substantially by 2030, posing a significant public health challenge. This article provides a comprehensive overview of rectal cancer, encompassing its epidemiology, anatomical intricacies, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis. The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for rectal cancer is detailed, offering crucial insights for staging and treatment decisions. Various treatment modalities are discussed, including surgical approaches, systemic therapies, radiation therapy, and local therapies for metastases. Recent advances in robotic surgery and innovative radiation technologies are explored. Furthermore, prevention strategies are elucidated, focusing on lifestyle modifications and pharmacological interventions that may mitigate the risk of colorectal cancer. The article underscores the importance of understanding rectal cancer for healthcare professionals and patients, enabling informed decision-making and enhanced management of this disease. Prognostic factors are outlined, with survival rates and the prognosis of rectal cancer contingent on several influential elements, highlighting the multifaceted nature of this condition. In conclusion, accurate diagnosis, diverse treatment options, and prevention strategies, including advances like robotic surgery, influence rectal cancer outcomes. A comprehensive overview empowers healthcare professionals and patients to make informed decisions for improved disease management and prognosis.
ABSTRACT
The development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has brought about substantial transformations in perioperative care, substituting conventional methods with a patient-centric, evidence-based strategy. ERAS protocol adopts a holistic approach to patient care, which includes all stages preceding, during, and following the operation. These programs prioritize patient-specific therapies that are tailored to their specific requirements. Nutritional assessment and enhancement, patient education, minimally invasive procedures, and multimodal pain management are all fundamental components of ERAS. ERAS provides a multitude of advantages, including diminished postoperative complications, abbreviated hospital stays, heightened patient satisfaction, and healthcare cost reductions. This article examines the foundational tenets of ERAS, their incorporation into the field of general surgery, their suitability for diverse surgical specialties, the obstacles faced during implementation, and possible directions for further investigation, such as the integration of digital health technologies, personalized patient care, and the long-term viability of ERAS protocols.
ABSTRACT
Liver resection is a pivotal treatment for various liver diseases, and the choice between laparoscopic (LR) and open (OR) methods is debatable. This study aims to compare their respective complications and hepatic outcomes comprehensively, providing critical insights to guide clinical decisions and optimize patient results. We conducted a comprehensive review across PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS, and the Cochrane Library until September 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic (LR) and open (OR) liver resections were included. Data screening, extraction, and quality assessments utilized the Risk of Bias (ROB-2). We conducted our analysis using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software, and the data were presented as risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our comprehensive research yielded 3,192 relevant records, and 9 RCTs were finally included. LR exhibited reduced operative bleeding (MD = -82.87 ml, 95% CI: -132.45 to -33.30, P=0.001) and shorter hospital stays (MD = -2.32 days, 95% CI: -3.65 to -0.98, P=0.0007). The risk of complications was significantly lower in the LR group (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.76, P<0.0001), especially in Clavian-Dindo classification degree 1 and 2 complications (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.79, P=0.005). LR patients also had lower postoperative AST levels at one day (MD = -123.16 U/L, 95% CI: -206.08 to -40.24, P=0.004) and three days (MD = -35.95 U/L, 95% CI: -65.83 to -6.06, P=0.02). These findings underscore LR's superiority, emphasizing its potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes, reduce complications, and improve recovery in liver resection procedures.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The UK's National Health Service (NHS) is a hub that trainees from all over the world want to join. However, there are many challenges for International Medical Graduates (IMGs). The aim of this study is to raise awareness of these challenges and to attempt to identify areas for improvement in the surgical training experience for international graduates wishing to join the NHS and obtain a National Training Number (NTN). METHODS: A 33-question survey was designed and distributed to the surgical community via The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Society (TUGSS) and social media. Eighty-five respondents, IMGs from 25 countries, participated. RESULTS: The results showed that 43.5% of doctors had a Master's degree (MSc). Most IMGs joined as locally employed doctors at the senior house officer or registrar level. They all faced many challenges in the UK, including difficulties finding a job in the NHS, obtaining an NTN, and adapting to the differences between UK surgical practice and their home country. More than 50% of doctors did not have a named educational/clinical supervisor, and 63.2% of them felt that the supervisor helped them to become more familiar with the system. The support doctors received from the human resources department of the hospital they joined was poor. In addition, more than half of the IMGs changed their career plans after joining the NHS (56.4%) and would like to stay in the UK (52.9%). The majority of them (43.9%) plan to obtain an NTN. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there is a need to support international doctors who wish to start or continue their training in the UK. Furthermore, IMGs should expect to face several challenges when applying to work in the UK NHS.
ABSTRACT
Suction devices are frequently used during laparoscopic surgery. However, their cost and limitations can be significant, depending on the clinical case, theatre setting and national health system. Furthermore, the continuous need to reduce the costs of the consumables in minimally invasive surgical procedures and their environmental burden creates extra pressure on the healthcare systems globally. Therefore, we present a new technique for laparoscopic suctioning, the Straw Pressure Gradient and Gravity (SPGG) technique. It is a safe, cost-effective and environmentally friendly technique compared to traditional suction devices. The technique involves using a sterile, single-use Suction Catheter 12-16 French after positioning the patient according to the targeted collection. The catheter is inserted via the laparoscopic port nearest the collection and directed using laparoscopic graspers. The outer end needs to be clamped to avoid fluid spillage, and the catheter tip is placed in the collection. Then after the clamp is released, the fluid will be successfully drained due to the pressure gradient into a pot placed at a lower level than the intra-abdominal collection. Minimal wash can be performed via the gas vent by using a syringe. SPGG is a safe and easy-to-learn technique that requires similar skills as placing an intra-abdominal drain during laparoscopy. It is softer than rigid, traditional suction devices and atraumatic. It can be used for suction, irrigation, collection of fluid for sampling and as a drain in case of an intraoperative indication. SPGG is a cost-effective device as it is cheaper than the average disposable suction device system and has multiple uses, which can significantly decrease the annual cost of laparoscopies. It can also reduce the number of consumables and lighten the environmental burden of laparoscopic procedures.
