Anabolic implant effects on visceral organ mass, chemical body composition, and estimated energetic efficiency in cloned (genetically identical) beef steers.

Six sets of four genetically identical Brangus steers (n = 24; X BW 409 kg) were used to determine the effect of different anabolic implants on visceral organ mass, chemical body composition, estimated tissue deposition, and energetic efficiency. Steers within a clone set were randomly assigned to one of the following implant treatments: C, no implant; E, estrogenic; A, androgenic, or AE, androgenic + estrogenic. Steers were slaughtered 112 d after implanting; visceral organs were weighed and final body composition determined by mechanical grinding and chemical analysis of the empty body. Mass of the empty gastrointestinal tract (GIT) was reduced approximately 9% (P < .10) in steers implanted with estrogen alone or in combination with an androgen. Liver mass was increased (P < .10) from 6 to 14% by implants. Steers implanted with the AE combination had greater (P < .10) daily protein accretion (163.4 g/d) than either E (128.8 g/d) or A (137.1 g/d), and, because the combination improved gain above C (101.1 g/d), this demonstrates the additive effects of a combination implant on protein deposition. Anabolic implants did not alter (P > .10) the efficiency of ME utilization. In general, estrogenic implants decreased GIT, androgenic implants increased liver, and all implants increased hide mass. Steers implanted with an AE combination had additive effects on protein deposition compared with either implant alone. The NEg requirements for body gain are estimated to be reduced 19% by estrogenic or combination implants.

Use of genetically identical (clone) steers to determine the effects of estrogenic and androgenic implants on beef quality and palatability characteristics.

Six sets of four genetically identical Brangus steers (n = 24; mean weight = 413 kg, SD = 19.8) were used to study the effects of estradiol and trenbolone acetate on beef quality and palatability characteristics. Steers in each clone set were randomly assigned to the following treatment groups: 1) a nonimplanted control; 2) a single estrogenic implant, containing 20 mg of estradiol benzoate and 200 mg of progesterone; 3) a single androgenic implant, containing 140 mg of trenbolone acetate; or 4) a single combination implant, containing 24 mg of 17-beta estradiol and 120 mg of trenbolone acetate. Following implantation, the steers were fed a high-concentrate finishing diet for a period of 112 d. Compared with control steers, implanted steers had higher (P < .05) average daily gains and heavier (P < .05) finished live weights and carcass weights. However, there were no differences (P > .05) among treatment groups with respect to their effects on growth rate, live weight, carcass weight, dressing percentage, fat thickness, longissimus muscle area, percentage of kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, or USDA yield grade. Moreover, marbling scores for implanted steers were not statistically different from marbling scores for control steers. However, a comparison among implant types showed that steers implanted with the estrogenic implant had significantly lower marbling scores than did steers implanted with the androgenic or combination implants. Use of androgenic and combination implants had no effect (P > .05) on beef tenderness of strip loin, top sirloin, or top round steaks; however, use of estrogenic implants decreased (P < .05) tenderness of top sirloin steaks.