Management of Portal Hypertension After Liver Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Post-transplantation portal hypertension has severe complications, such as esophageal varix bleeding, therapy refractory ascites, extreme splenomegaly, and graft dysfunction. The aim of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of the therapeutic strategies and how to visualize the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective study involving liver transplantation patients from the Semmelweis University Department of Transplantation and Surgery was performed between 2005 and 2015. The prevalence, etiology, and leading complications of the condition were determined. The applied interventions' effects on the patients' ascites volume, splenic volume, and the occurrence of variceal bleeding were determined. Mean portal blood flow velocity and congestion index values were calculated using Doppler ultrasonography. RESULTS: The prevalence of post-transplantation portal hypertension requiring intervention was 2.8%. The most common etiology of the disease was portal anastomotic stenosis. The most common complications were esophageal varix bleeding and therapy refractory ascites. The patients' ascites volume decreased significantly (2923.3 ± 1893.2 mL vs. 423.3 ± 634.3 mL; P < .05), their splenic volume decreased markedly. After the interventions, only one case of recurrent variceal bleeding was reported. The calculated Doppler parameters were altered in the opposite direction in cases of pre-hepatic versus intra- or post-hepatic portal hypertension. After the interventions, these parameters shifted towards the physiologic ranges. CONCLUSION: The interventions performed in our clinic were effective in most cases. The patients' ascites volume, splenic volume, and the prevalence of variceal bleeding decreased after the treatment. Doppler ultrasonography has proved to be a valuable imaging modality in the diagnosis and the follow-up of post-transplantation portal hypertension.

Examinations of Factors Influencing Survival of Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience From Budapest.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the best therapy of choice for early, unresectable HCC. The Hungarian Liver Transplantation Program was launched in 1995 at the Department of Transplantation and Surgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest. From that time more than 60 patients underwent OLT for hepatic tumors, which in most cases were HCC. Our clinical examination was undertaken to analyze the possible influential factors of outcomes for our series of patients who received OLT for HCC. METHODS: We performed a review of all patients who underwent OLT for HCC at our department from 1996 to October 1, 2013. Disease extent was determined by preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images. All explants were examined and categorized based on tumor number, size, distribution, HCC histologic grade, and vascular invasion. Patients with HCC were classified as having tumors either meeting Milan criteria, beyond Milan criteria but within UCSF criteria, or exceeding UCSF criteria. OLT was performed using standard techniques including orthotopic implantation with cross-clamp technique or with the piggyback technique. Postoperative immunosuppression included a triple drug regimen of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone. mTOR inhibitors have been available since 2004. RESULTS: HCC most commonly occurs in the presence of cirrhosis as a result of longstanding chronic liver disease. Most of our patients who underwent OLT for HCC are 56 to 60 years old, and most also had underlying HCV cirrhosis. As of October 1, 2013, 21 of 49 (42.85%) patients had died after OLT for HCC. The main cause was the recurrence of the HCC in 38%, followed by sepsis in 33%, and HCV recurrence in 19%. One death each (4.7% of the total number of deaths) was caused by primary nonfunction of the graft, acute myocardial infarct, and de novo malignancy, respectively. Overall survival for the entire group at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplantation was 73.48%, 65.2%, and 50.08%, respectively. Using pretransplant imaging, 34 tumors (69.3%) were within Milan criteria, 8 (16.3%) were beyond Milan but within UCSF criteria, and 7 (14.3%) exceeded UCSF criteria. Based on explant pathology, 30 tumors (61.2%) were within Milan criteria, 7 (14,3%) were beyond Milan but within UCSF criteria, and 12 (24.3%) exceeded UCSF criteria. New onset, non-HCC malignant tumor developed in 2 cases (4%). There was no significant difference between the surgical techniques or the immunosuppressive strategies. Using the Cox analysis in our series, it can be seen that mortality was higher with tumors exceeding Milan criteria but within UCSF criteria compared with tumors within Milan criteria (Coef. = 0.5749 in Setting 1 and 0.1226 in Setting 2), and even higher with tumors beyond UCSF criteria compared with tumors within Milan criteria (Coef. = 0.7228 in Setting 1 and 0.1456 in Setting 2). Recurrence of the tumor causes higher mortality (Coef. = 1.709 in Setting 1 and 1.0256 in Setting 2). It seems that using an mTOR inhibitor has a beneficial impact on mortality (Coef. = -1.409 in Setting 1). Vascular invasion was associated with higher mortality (Coef. = 0.6581in Setting 1). Higher AFP levels correlated with higher mortality but not significantly (Coef. = 0.0002 in Setting 2). In our series, survival after OLT for HCC was best with tumors within Milan criteria comparing those exceeded Milan criteria (odds ratio = 4.000). CONCLUSION: According to our findings, the Milan criteria are still the safest criteria system; however, slightly expanded criteria do not have significantly worse results. Preoperative imaging methods sometimes show fewer or smaller tumors, and the explant histology reports the exact staging of HCC at the time of OLT. Histological examination especially of the lymphovascular invasion is mandatory to assess the estimated prognosis. Extremely high levels of AFP mean higher risk. HCC recurrence is an important factor on the outcome; therefore, continuous oncologic screening is mandatory. Immunosuppressant agents are chiefly responsible not just for higher risk of recurrence but for higher risk to develop de novo malignancies. Viral serology must be done periodically to catch HCV recurrence in time and begin adequate antiviral therapy. Potentially, mTOR inhibitors could be potent immunosuppressive agents after OLT for HCC due to this antiproliferative effect.

Measurement and clinical significance of interleukin 28B in hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant patients.

One-third of the liver transplantations are performed because of hepatitis C cirrhosis all over the world and also in Hungary. The recurrence rate is practically 100%, influencing graft and patient survivals; within 5 years cirrhosis develops again in 20% to 30% of cases. The therapy is pegylated interferon α-2a and α-2b plus ribavirin as for nontransplanted subjects with the goal to eradicate the virus and maintain graft function. In 25% to 45% of treated patients, it is possible to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR). The response is influenced by viral, donor, and recipient factors. We investigated the genotype of 68 liver recipients transplanted because of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection between September 1998 and February 2011. We focused on the interleukin (IL) 28B gene locus single nucleotide polymorphism found on chromosome 19; the rs12979860 minor allele (homozygous [wild TT and CC], heterozygous [CT]) in relation to the interferon response. Ten percent of the patients belonged to the CC, 62% to the CT, and 28% to the TT group, and 83% of the CC group became negative or therapy is still ongoing. The CT genotype reached 15.4% SVR with ongoing treatment for most patients. In TT carriers showed a 23.5% SVR. Our patients formed a homogenous group regarding the surgical team, the therapy, and the HCV genotype. Ninety percent belonged to the possible "hard to treat" group. The 10% CC group gave the highest number of SVR and HCV polymerase chain reaction negativity upon antiviral therapy. Regarding our results, one has to take in consideration the small patient number and the fact that the cirrhotic patients were listed for transplantation where they could not be treated or became therapy-resistant. IL28B is just one predictive factor among others for successful posttransplant HCV therapy; further examinations are needed to fully understand its role.

Predictive factors of sustained virological response for recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: the hungarian experience.

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (OLT) occurs consistently. Early initiation of combined antiviral treatment (AVT) has become a standard treatment seeking to achieve sustained virological response (SVR). We evaluated the files of 108 HCV-positive patients between 2003 and 2010. Seventy-two (72) experienced recurrent HCV within 12 months, 31 of whom completed the AVT (43%) but 9 (29%) exhibited SVR. Factors with impacting SVR were male recipient, no fatty changes in the donor liver, short warm ischemia time, cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, neither infective, septic or bleeding complication nor acute rejection episode and a rapid viral response to AVT. De novo diabetes, and unsuccessful AVT prior to OLT were strongly associated with a a failed SVR. The 1- and 3-year cumulative patient survival rates trended to be better in cases of SVR compared with nonresponders (100% and 100% versus 94% and 89%; P = .07).

Childbirth after organ transplantation in Hungary.

BACKGROUND: The first successfully delivered newborn after organ transplantation was reported in 1963; since then, >14,000 women have delivered after transplantation. Patients with an end-stage organ disease develop fertility disturbances. One year after a successful solid organ transplantation with stable graft function, fertile women can give birth to a child from a medical point of view. Pregnant transplant patients do experience a high risk of graft function worsening, a rejection episode, and opportunistic infections. Furthermore, the medical therapy may influence teratogenicity. METHODS: Between 1974 and September 1, 2010, 5 Hungarian centers performed 6802 solid organ transplantation and lungs were grafted in Vienna, Austria. The organ distribution was: 5971 kidney, 454 liver, 187 heart, 90 combined pancreas-kidney, 5 combined islet-kidney, and 95 lung transplantation. There were no pregnancies among heart, lung, and pancreas recipients. RESULTS: In all, 3.9% of the renal and 14.3% of the fertile liver transplanted women gave birth to children. To wit, 23 kidney recipients delivered 27 healthy children (17 boys and 10 girls). In 4 cases, 2 children were born, twice as twins. Among liver recipients, 8 women delivered 8 healthy babies. There was no hepatitis C or B virus-positive patient among the mothers. There was no graft insufficiency, rejection or birth defect. Transplanted mothers often display toxemia or preeclampsia during pregnancy requiring cesarean section. The relatively higher ratio of liver recipients was perhaps due to the rarer occurrence of extrahepatic organ damage, like diabetic nephropathy or cardiomyopathy, and the reversible nature of hepatorenal or hepatopulmonary syndrome. CONCLUSION: Delivery of a child by a transplanted mother carries an high risk, requiring interdisciplinary cooperation. The quality of life of solid organ recipients can be significantly raised by childbirth under appropriate circumstances.

H1N1 vaccination in pediatric renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy are considered to be at high risk of serious infectious complications. In 2009, a new influenza pandemic caused serious infections and deaths, especially among children and immunocompromised patients. Herein we have reported the safety and efficacy of a single-shot monovalent whole-virus vaccine against H1N1 infection in the pediatric renal transplant population. METHODS: In November and December 2009, we vaccinated 37 renal transplant children and adolescents and measured their antibody responses. Seroprotection, seroconversion, and seroconversion factors were analyzed at 21 days after vaccination. RESULTS: None of the vaccinated patients experienced vaccine-related side effects. None of the patients had an H1N1 influenza infection after vaccination. All of the patients showed elevations in antibody titer at 21 days after vaccination. In contrast, only 29.72% of the patients achieved a safe seroprotection level and only 18.75% a safe seroconversion rate. More intense immunosuppressive treatment displayed negative effect on seroprotection and seroconversion, and antibody production significantly increased with age. No other factor was observed to influence seroprotection. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend vaccination of children and adolescent renal transplant recipients against H1N1 virus. However, a single shot of vaccine may not be sufficient; to achieve seroprotection, a booster vaccination and measurement of the antibody response are needed to assure protection of our patients.

Relationship between hepatitis C virus recurrence and de novo diabetes after liver transplantation: the Hungarian experience.

De novo diabetes mellitus is a common complication after liver transplantation. It is strongly associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We analyzed the relationship between HCV recurrence and de novo diabetes among the Hungarian liver transplant population. This retrospective study included cases from 1995 to 2009 on 310 whole liver transplantations. De novo diabetes was defined if the patient had a fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL permanently after the third month post liver transplantation, and/or required sustained antidiabetic therapy. De novo diabetes occured in 63 patients (20%). The cumulative patient survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 95%, 91%, 88%, and 88% in the control group, and 87%, 79%, 79%, and 64% in the de novo group, respectively (P=.011). The majority of the patients in the de novo group were HCV positive (66% vs 23%). Early virus recurrence within 5 months was associated with the development of diabetes (80% vs 20% non-diabetic controls; P=.017). The fibrosis (2.05 ± 1.5 vs 1 ± 1; P=.039) and Knodell scores (3.25 ± 2 vs 1.69 ± 1.2; P=.019) were higher among the de novo group after antiviral therapy. Rapid recurrence, more severe viremia, and fibrosis showed significant roles in the developement of de novo diabetes after liver transplantation.

Mitigation of cytokine storm by intraoperative use of renal replacement therapy during combined liver-kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is a widely used multiorgan transplantation with good graft survival rates. Previous studies have shown beneficial effects of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients. This observation led us to use intraoperative continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) during multiorgan transplantations. METHODS: We analyzed (CRP) inflammatory response parameters of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha, interleukin(IL)-6, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) at various stages of the combined transplantations. RESULTS: All patients survived with well-functioning grafts. Mean +/- SD follow-up was 32.8 +/- 14.2 months. During the whole operation we used intraoperative CVVH starting at the beginning and continuing in the intensive care unit (ICU) afterward (mean +/- SD, 11.2 +/- 8.4 hours). Intraoperative TNFalpha, IL-6, CRP, and PCT were measured before surgery, during hepatectomy in the anhepatic phase, before and after liver reperfusion, exactly before kidney reperfusion, after kidney reperfusion, and upon arrival in the ICU. The wash-out of cytokines together with hemodynamic stability gave optimal circumstances for recovery of the transplanted organs. CONCLUSIONS: CVVH-based therapy offered stable intraoperative parameters, prevention of fluid overload, correction of metabolic disturbances, and wash-out of cytokines, which gave optimal circumstances for recovery of transplanted organs.

Comparing cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplantation: single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) presents a serious threat to CMV-seronegative recipients (R-), who have received an organ from a seropositive donor (D+). OBJECTIVES: We compared the effectiveness of three different prophylactic protocols in CMV D+/R- patients and reviewed data on patients who received no prophylaxis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1137 kidney transplantations from 1995 to 2004. Of these, 147 recipients were CMV negative (D+/R-); 125 patients received CMV prophylaxis. Group I received CMV hyperimmune gammaglobulin only, group II received CMV hyperimmune gammaglobulin plus oral ganciclovir, and group III received prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir only. RESULTS: In group I, CMV infection was observed in 31 of 53 patients (59%), and CMV disease was diagnosed in 9 (17%) during the prophylaxis. In the first year post transplant, a total of 41 of 53 patients (77.5%) had primary CMV infection. In group II, CMV infection occurred in 7 of 30 patients (23%), and CMV disease was diagnosed in only 2 (7%) during prophylaxis. In the first year post transplant, a total of 9 of 30 patients (30%) had primary CMV infection. In group III, 9 of 42 patients (21%) developed CMV infection during prophylaxis, and CMV disease was not observed. In the first year post transplant, a total of 13 of 42 patients (30%) had primary CMV infection. In contrast, all 22 CMV D+/R- patients without prophylaxis developed CMV infection (100%); CMV disease was diagnosed in 10 (45%), and 1 patient died. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with hyperimmune gammaglobulin and/or oral ganciclovir significantly reduces CMV infection and disease. Prophylaxis with ganciclovir was significantly more effective than hyperimmune gammaglobulin monoprophylaxis, and more cost effective than combined prophylaxis.

Factors in association with sepsis after liver transplantation: the Hungarian experience.

Sepsis is the major cause of patient death after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). To identify risk factors for sepsis, we analyzed all 199 primary OLTs performed between 1995 and 2004. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they experienced sepsis after liver transplantation. Recipient, perioperative factors, and complications were subjected to univariate analyses. Statistically significant factors were exposed to multivariate analyses: Cox regression and Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Sepsis occurred in 45 (23%) patients. Recipient Child-Pugh score, preoperative broad spectrum antibiotic (meropenem) prophylaxis, intraoperative red blood cell transfusion, starch infusion, postoperative bleeding, hepatic artery thrombosis, and biliary leakage/necrosis were independent risk factors for sepsis. Our results agree with the international experience. A high amount of starch infusion and an extended use of broad spectrum antibiotics for prophylaxis adverse experiences in our center and have been removed from the protocol.

Possible use of Betadine in HIV-positive patients.

The results of Betadine treatment obtained in the course of a one-year period proved the usefulness of the bacteriostatic and bactericidal product as a disinfectant of the skin and mucosa in immuno-deficiency diseases, in our cases in AIDS (but supposedly in other similar diseases as well). In these diseases this new therapeutic means does supply a need. The solution was successfully used in patients in whom superficial decontamination is of high importance and whose cutaneous and mucosal infections had raised therapeutic problems for years. Side-effects were not observed. The product could be easily applied. If the germ count of the atrophying pathogen is not very high and the lesion is due supposedly to mixed infection, the product will be effective even in monotherapy. Similarly, in mild mycotic infections systemic therapy could be avoided. In cases of purulent alterations the solution is successfully applied as an adjuvant to antibacterial treatment and its continuous use prevents early recurrence. The long-term use of the product did not cause side-effects, irritation of the skin or the mucosa.