[Preservative-free fixed combination in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: the VISIONARY Study (EUPAS22204)]. / Fiksirovannaya kombinatsiya bez konservanta v lechenii pervichnoi otkrytougol'noi glaukomy i oftal'mogipertenzii: issledovanie VISIONARY (EUPAS22204).

Preservative-free fixed combination of 0.0015% Tafluprost and 0.5% Timolol (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) has demonstrated good antihypertensive effect and patient tolerance in randomized controlled clinical trials. PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of PF tafluprost/timolol FC in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH) who couldn't tolerate or gave insufficient response to topical beta-adrenoblockers or prostaglandin analogue monotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective multicenter European VISIONARY study (EUPAS22204) included 87 patients from 7 ophthalmological centers in Russia with mean age of 63.9±11.8. Primary endpoint was mean IOP change at month 6. The patients were monitored for changes in in the severity of ocular signs and symptoms. RESULTS: Statistically significant (p<0.0001) reduction of mean IOP from baseline was seen at all study visits: 7.3±5.17 mmHg at week 4, 7.4±5.40 mmHg at week 12, and 7.1±5.10 mmHg at month 6. By month 6, IOP has decreased by 20; 25; 30 and 35% from baseline in 77.0%, 58.9%, 43.7%, and 31.0% of study patients, respectively. Conjunctival hyperemia was significantly reduced at all study visits. Significant reductions in dry eye symptoms (p<0.0010), irritation (p=0.0204) and itching (p=0.0010) were also observed. After 6 months on PF tafluprost/timolol FC, 85.7% of patients described it as easy or very easy to tolerate. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, PF tafluprost/timolol FC provided statistically significant IOP reductions in patients with POAG and OH insufficiently controlled by or intolerant to monotherapy with topical beta-adrenoblockers or a prostaglandin analogue. The highest IOP reduction was seen at week 4 and was maintained over the 6-month study period. There was also a decrease in the severity of symptoms of ocular surface condition.

[Medicated prevention of scarring after glaucoma surgery]. / Medikamentoznaya profilaktika posleoperatsionnogo rubtsevaniya v khirurgicheskom lechenii glaukomy.

Modulation of wound healing is one of the main challenges in glaucoma surgery. Modern antiproliferative agents used to reduce postoperative scarring are either insufficiently effective or inadequate in terms of safety. In the search for novel agents devoid of such drawbacks, specialists directed their attention to selective inhibitors of proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. The article reviews pathophysiologic basis of wound healing, characteristics of inflammatory mediators affecting fibroblast proliferation and scarring, and provides description of the currently used and new, potentially promising antiproliferative agents.

[Influence of treatment adherence on the progression of primary open-angle glaucoma in clinical setting]. / Vliianie priverzhennosti k lecheniiu na progressirovanie pervichnoi otkrytougol'noi glaukomy u patsientov v usloviiakh klinicheskoi praktiki.

According to various studies, treatment adherence of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma ranges from 5% to 80% and significantly influences the effectiveness of the therapy. Some authors report higher levels of adherence in patients receiving preservative-free medications. PURPOSE: To study the influence of treatment adherence in patients receiving preservative-free and preserved medications on the progression of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter non-interventional study was conducted in clinical setting and included 504 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma receiving drug therapy; 51 ophthalmologist was involved in the management of patients' diaries. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who did not reach target IOP was three times lower in the group with high adherence, in comparison to patients with medium and low adherence (7% against 22%, respectively). Development of side effects was one of the factors influencing treatment adherence, their rates and expressiveness were much lower in the preservative-free group compared with the group receiving preserved medication (13.9% against 35.4%). The rate of patients who did not reach target IOP was two times lower in the group of preservative-free medication (10% against 21%). CONCLUSION: The study confirms that preservative-free glaucoma medication promotes higher adherence to treatment in clinical setting predominantly due to the reduction of quantity and severity of side effects leading to treatment gaps, which results in increased effectiveness and better stabilization of glaucoma.