Hyperbaric oxygen and focused rehabilitation program: a feasibility study in improving upper limb motor function after stroke.

Neuroplasticity and recovery after stroke can be enhanced by a rehabilitation program pertinent to upper limb motor function exercise and mental imagery (EMI) as well as hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). We assessed feasibility and safety of the combined approach utilizing both HBOT and EMI, and to derive preliminary estimates of its efficacy. In this randomized controlled trial, 27 patients with upper extremity hemiparesis at 3-48 months after stroke were randomized to receive either a complementary rehabilitation program of HBOT-EMI (intervention group), or EMI alone (control group). Feasibility and safety were assessed as total session attendance, duration of sessions, attrition rates, missing data, and intervention-related adverse events. Secondary clinical outcomes were assessed with both objective tools and self-reported measures at baseline, 8 weeks (end of treatment), and 12-weeks follow-up. Session attendance, duration, and attrition rate did not differ between the groups; there were no serious adverse events. Compared with baseline, there were significant sustained improvements of objective and subjective outcomes' measures in the intervention group, and a single improvement in an objective measure in the control group. Between-group outcome comparisons were not statistically significant. This study demonstrated that the combination HBOT-EMI was a safe and feasible approach in patients recovering from chronic stroke. There were also trends for improved motor function of the affected upper limb after the treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02666469. Novelty HBOT combined with an upper limb exercise and mental imagery rehabilitation program is feasible and safe in chronic stroke patients. This combined approach showed trends for improved functional recovery.

Total versus hemithyroidectomy for microscopic papillary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: No increased mortality has been reported in patients with thyroid papillary microcarcinoma (PMC); however, neck recurrences and distant metastases have been described. In this study, we compare patients' outcomes after total thyroidectomy vs hemithyroidectomy for treatment of thyroid PMC. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-three patients from two major medical centers in Israel were included. The mean follow-up period was 7.2±6.8 yr. RESULTS: Total thyroidectomy was performed in 214 patients and hemithyroidectomy in 79 patients. Mean tumor size was 6.3±3 mm. Lymph-node (LN) metastases and extraglandular extension were more frequent in the total thyroidectomy group than in the hemithyroidectomy group, 24.8% vs 1.3% (p<0.001) and 11.7% vs 3.8% (p=0.042), respectively. The cumulative incidence of recurrence at the end of follow-up was 13.2% in the total thyroidectomy group and 14.3% in the hemithyroidectomy group (p=ns). The incidence of recurrence was higher in patients with LN involvement in both groups. Considering low risk patients only (monofocal tumors, no LN involvement, no extraglandular extension; no.=63 in the total thyroidectomy group vs no.=60 in the hemithyroidectomy group) neck recurrence was found in 10% of patients in the hemithyroidectomy group but none in the total thyroidectomy group. In the hemithyroidectomy group, all locoregional recurrences were diagnosed using ultrasonography, compared to 47.6% in the total thyroidectomy group. CONCLUSION: For patients with monofocal disease within the thyroid gland and no LN involvement, hemithyroidectomy can be considered an option, bearing in mind a higher risk for recurrence. For all other patients with PMC, we propose total thyroidectomy as initial treatment.