The policy implications of better structure and process on birth outcomes in Jamaica.

BACKGROUND: We investigated if better structural and process elements of prenatal care relate to higher birth weights in the Jamaican population. METHODS: We used data from two surveys: (1) a national sample of randomly selected households; and (2) a concurrent facility survey of the public health clinics in Jamaica. In the household survey, all women aged 14-50, who had a pregnancy lasting 7 months during the previous 5 years (n = 913) were interviewed. From the household survey, we gathered information on the maternal, clinical and socioeconomic risk factors and on the newborns birth weight (the outcome measure). The facility survey collected data from all public primary care clinics in the country (n = 366). This gave us information on the quality of care (structure and process measures) provided in the clinics. FINDINGS: Prenatal care in Jamaica, while generally available, provides care to many women who are at particular risk because of parity, age and poverty. Structural measures of the facilities show that clinics are in general disrepair, have only 70% of the basic equipment and are insufficiently stocked with supplies or medication. Many facilities had poor process of care, as measured by assessing the clinical examination and counseling. The average birth weight was 3232 g and 9.8% weighed < 2500 g. The relationships between birth weight and the quality of care were estimated using multiple regression. The biologic and socioeconomic risk factors related to birth weight in the expected direction. None of the structural quality measures were statistically significant. Among the process measures, women who had access to a more complete examination, had infants that weighed an average of 128 g more at birth. INTERPRETATION: Better quality of care, provided by a more thorough clinical evaluation, has a more powerful effect on birth weight in the population than upgraded facilities or equipment. In developed or developing countries, where resources are limited, policy should focus on education and training to improve birth outcomes.

Are clinical criteria just proxies for socioeconomic status? A study of low birth weight in Jamaica.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the clinical risk factors for low birth weight are independent of socioeconomic risk factors in a population based sample from a developing country. DESIGN: Survey data from patient reported socioeconomic measures and their most recent pregnancy history. SETTING: A national sample of randomly selected households in Jamaica. SUBJECTS: All women aged 14-50 in the household who had a pregnancy lasting seven months in the past five years (n = 952). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Birth weight. RESULTS: Clinical risk factors for low birth weight, such as parity age, are independent of socioeconomic determinants, such as consumption and where a mother lives. Women who are nulliparous, 35 or older, poor, or living in certain areas are more likely to have lower birth weight children than those that do not have these characteristics (t statistics > 2.0). The addition of socioeconomic factors to the multiple regression does not alter the estimates for the clinical risk factors for low birth weight. Thus, the effect of being nulliparous can be offset by being in the highest consumption quintile and, conversely, the risk of being older will be compounded if women are poor. CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical and socioeconomic risk factors should be used to target women at risk. In terms of the quality of care, this study links clinical and socioeconomic risk factors to poor outcomes. Further studies are needed, however, to link the quality of care at various locations to these outcomes.

Gender differences in adult health: an international comparison.

This article uses data from the United States, Jamaica, Malaysia, and Bangladesh to explore gender differences in adult health. The results show that women fare worse than men across a variety of self-reported health measures in all four countries studies. These health status disparities between men and women persist even after appropriate corrections are made for the impact of (a) differential mortality selection by gender and (b) sociodemographic factors. Data from Jamaica indicate that gender disparities in adult health arise early and persist throughout the life cycle, with different age profiles for different measures.

PIP: The US, Jamaica, Malaysia, and Bangladesh have different levels of socioeconomic development, life styles, gender norms, and expectations. The authors use survey data on measures of general health and physical functioning by age and gender in their study of differential gender patterns in adult health and their determinants. The study found that there are significant gender differences in adult health, with women faring worse than men across a variety of measures in all four countries studied. Health status disparities between the sexes persist even after correcting for the impact of differential mortality selection by gender and sociodemographic factors such as age, education, income, and location of respondent. Biological factors, behavioral factors, and reporting biases have all been suggested as explanations for these gender differences in adult ill health. Given the consistency of the gender disparity in adult ill health across different measures and countries with different levels of education, income, life styles, and norms and expectations about behavior as illustrated in this study, however, reporting bias is most likely not a major cause of gender differentials in adult health. The fact that significant gender differentials in adult health persist despite controlling for sociodemographic characteristics points instead to the need for further research into the behavioral and biological bases of the differentials.

Quality of care in public and private primary health care facilities: structural comparisons in Jamaica.

This article examines the quality of care provided by Jamaican primary health care clinics by comparing various structural quality indexes derived from a nationwide 1990 survey of 366 public clinics and 189 private clinics. This comparison points up important differences in the quality of care being provided by public versus private and urban versus rural facilities that might not have been anticipated. Among other things, the study found that the public clinics provided better prenatal diagnosis and counseling and more family planning services than the private clinics. However, the private clinics tended to be better condition, better equipped and supplied, and better able to provide certain laboratory test results in a timely manner. Comparison of urban and rural public clinics indicated that the urban clinics were somewhat better provisioned with equipment, supplies, and pharmaceuticals. However, the rural clinics appeared to be in better repair. Comparison of basic and higher-level public clinics showed the basic clinics to be in better condition and more fully staffed than the higher-level clinics while having similar perinatal diagnostic capabilities. However, the higher-level public clinics tended to have an overall profile more resembling that of the private clinics, being better equipped and supplied than the basic clinics. While structural measures of quality such as those employed here tend to poorly estimate health outcomes, they do serve as good indicators of access to services where resources are severely constrained. For policy-makers, the results presented here could prove useful in guiding concrete interventions, summarizing the structural elements of health care quality at different types of facilities, and providing a method for less costly evaluation of programs designed to improve services at primary health care clinics.

Determinants of pregnancy outcomes and targeting of maternal health services in Jamaica.

Detailed nationally representative population level data were used to investigate the pre-natal care and delivery experiences of pregnant women in Jamaica. The results of this study show that: (a) demographic criteria (particularly first births) and self-reported clinical pregnancy complications are valid predictors of deleterious maternal health outcomes and can be used to stratify mothers into risk groups. (b) There appears to be a significant problem of under and inappropriate utilization of pre-natal care services by all women and in particular by demographically 'high risk' women, i.e. young, first time mothers. Significant proportions of the latter group report either no pre-natal care visits at all or visits which are later than the first trimester. The problems of delayed initiation of pre-natal care are specially exacerbated for poor, teenage mothers who happen to be living in the Kingston Metropolitan Area. (c) In terms of the content and quality of pre-natal care services the message is somewhat mixed. On the positive side the pre-natal care system is doing a moderately satisfactory job with regard to diagnostic tests and educational advice. On the negative side however, the fact that once women enter the health care system they all receive the same moderately adequate care (in terms of diagnostic evaluations and educational advice) with no attempt to focus particular attention on high risk mothers is troublesome. (d) With regard to appropriate delivery venues for pregnant women, pre-natal care visits do not appear to significantly influence the choice of delivery venues. Moreover, rich urban women are much more likely to deliver in a hospital than their rural peers. In conclusion, the study discusses the social and behavioral context of these results, addresses the policy implications and makes some recommendations to improve maternal health services.