Clinical Conundrum: Return to High Altitude After Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

Luks, Andrew M., Thomas G. DeLoughery, Jeffrey H. Gertsch, and Suzy Stokes. Clinical conundrum: return to high altitude after cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. High Alt Med Biol. 00:00-00, 2024.

Monitoring scoliosis and other spinal deformity surgeries.

Surgery to correct a spinal deformity incurs a risk of injury to the spinal cord and roots. Injuries include postoperative paraplegia. Surgery for cervical myelopathy also incurs risk for postoperative motor deficits, as well as nerve injury most commonly at the C5 root. Risks can be mitigated by monitoring the nervous system during surgery. Ideally, monitoring detects an impending injury in time to intervene and correct the impairment before it becomes permanent. Monitoring includes several modalities of testing. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure axonal conduction in the spinal cord posterior columns. This can be checked almost continuously during surgery. Motor evoked potentials measure conduction along the lateral corticospinal tracts. Because motor pathway stimulation often produces a patient movement on the table, these often are tested periodically rather than continuously. Electromyography observes for spontaneous discharges accompanying injuries, and is useful to assess misplacement of pedicle screws. Literature demonstrates the usefulness of these techniques, their association with reducing motor adverse outcomes, and the relative value of the techniques. Neurophysiologic monitoring for scoliosis, kyphosis, and cervical myelopathy surgery are addressed, along with background information about those conditions.

Practice guidelines for the supervising professional: intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

The American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) was founded in 1989 as the American Society of Evoked Potential Monitoring. From the beginning, the Society has been made up of physicians, doctoral degree holders, Technologists, and all those interested in furthering the profession. The Society changed its name to the ASNM and held its first Annual Meeting in 1990. It remains the largest worldwide organization dedicated solely to the scientifically-based advancement of intraoperative neurophysiology. The primary goal of the ASNM is to assure the quality of patient care during procedures monitoring the nervous system. This goal is accomplished primarily through programs in education, advocacy of basic and clinical research, and publication of guidelines, among other endeavors. The ASNM is committed to the development of medically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for the performance of intraoperative neurophysiology. Guidelines are formulated based on exhaustive literature review, recruitment of expert opinion, and broad consensus among ASNM membership. Input is likewise sought from sister societies and related constituencies. Adherence to a literature-based, formalized process characterizes the construction of all ASNM guidelines. The guidelines covering the Professional Practice of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring were initially published January 24th, 2013, and subsequently that document has undergone review and revision to accommodate broad inter- and intra-societal feedback. This current version of the ASNM Professional Practice Guideline was fully approved for publication according to ASNM bylaws on February 22nd, 2018, and thus overwrites and supersedes the initial guideline.

Use of Posterior Root-Muscle Reflexes in Peripheral Nerve Surgery: A Case Report.

It is well established that a mixed-agent general anesthetic regimen of volatile gas and intravenous anesthetic or total intravenous anesthetic (TIVA) is required to obtain adequate transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) to detect and hopefully prevent injury during brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerve surgery. But even under ideal general anesthetic conditions, TcMEPs are not always detectable in every muscle monitored, and are prone to anesthetic fade, especially when neuropathic or injured tissue is monitored. TcMEP sensitivity to general anesthesia can be especially problematic during peripheral nerve surgery where there is often only one or a few essential muscles required to provide adequate monitoring; thus, maximum fidelity is essential. However, there is an anesthetic-resistant high-fidelity modality available to successfully monitor the motor component of distant peripheral nerves originating from the cauda equina. Percutaneus transabdominal electrical stimulation elicits a relatively anesthetic-resistant, robust motor response in muscles innervated by cauda equina nerve roots. We report the successful use of posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflex to monitor the decompression of the sciatic nerve at its bifurcation in a 22-year-old female with a history of severe sciatic nerve neuropathic pain and muscle weakness following benign thigh tumor resection.

Vasculopathy, Ischemia, and the Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: Report of Three Cases.

Multi-modal neurophysiologic monitoring consisting of triggered and spontaneous electromyography and transcranial motor-evoked potentials may detect and prevent both acute and slow developing mechanical and vascular nerve injuries in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery. In case report 1, a marked reduction in the transcranial motor-evoked potentials on the operative side alerted to a 28% decrease in mean arterial blood pressure in a 54-year-old woman during an L3-4, L4-5 LLIF. After hemodynamic stability was regained, transcranial motor-evoked potentials returned to baseline and the patient suffered no postoperative complications. In case report 2, a peroneal nerve train-of-four stimulation threshold of 95 mA portended the potential for a triggered electromyography false negative in a 70-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and body mass index of 30.7 kg/m undergoing an L3-4, L4-5 LLIF. Higher triggered electromyography threshold values were applied to this patient's relatively quiescent triggered electromyography and the patient suffered no postoperative complications. In case report 3, the loss of right quadriceps motor-evoked potentials detected a retractor related nerve injury in a 59-year-old man undergoing an L4-5 LLIF. The surgery was aborted, but the patient suffered persistent postoperative right leg paresthesia and weakness. These reports highlight the sensitivity of peripheral nerve elements to ischemia (particularly in the presence of vascular risk factors) during the LLIF procedure and the need for dynamic multi-modal intraoperative monitoring.

Syndrome of acute anxiety among marines after recent arrival at high altitude.

Management of mental health is critical for maintenance of readiness in austere military environments. Emerging evidence implicates hypoxia as an environmental trigger of anxiety spectrum symptomatology. One thousand thirty-six unacclimatized infantry Marines ascended from sea level to the Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center (2,061-3,383 m) for a 30-day exercise. Within the first 6 days of training, 7 servicemen presented with severe, acute anxiety/panic with typical accompanying signs of sympathetic activation and no classic symptoms of acute mountain sickness (including headache). Four had a history of well-controlled psychiatric diagnoses. Invariably, cardiopulmonary and neurological evaluations were unrevealing, and acute cardiopulmonary events were excluded within limits of expeditionary diagnostic capabilities. All patients responded clinically to oxygen, rest, and benzodiazepines, returning to baseline function the same day. The unexpected onset of 7 cases of acute anxiety symptomatology coincident with recent arrival at moderate-to-high altitudes represents a highly unusual incidence and temporal distribution, suggestive of hypobaric hypoxemia as the proximal cause. We propose acute hypoxic physiological anxiety (AHPA) as a unique member of the spectrum of altitude-associated neurological disorders. Recognition of AHPA is particularly relevant in a military population; warfighters with anxiety spectrum diagnoses may have a recognizable and possibly preventable vulnerability.

Anesthesia considerations for monitoring TCMEPs in adults diagnosed with poliomyelitis as children: a case report.

UNLABELLED: The use of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TCMEPs) to detect and hopefully prevent injury to the brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerves intraoperatively has increased greatly in recent years. It is well established that in addition to certain anesthetic agents, patient factors such as advanced age, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and a collection of neurological and neuromuscular diseases and disorders can greatly reduce or completely eliminate the ability to monitor TCMEPs effectively. One such disease, poliomyelitis (polio), is a highly contagious viral disease that has been mostly forgotten since its near-eradication through vaccination. Over the past three decades there has been increasing recognition of late onset neurological deterioration in individuals who were afflicted by, and apparently recovered from, paralytic poliomyelitis much earlier in life. This condition is known as post-poliomyelitis syndrome (PPS). Patients that appear to have fully recovered from polio, and those with PPS, may require special anesthetic considerations to facilitate effective TCMEP monitoring. CASE REPORT: We report the rapid loss of only lower extremity TCMEPs bilaterally during a C6-C7, C7-T1 ACDF in a 67-year-old female to treat left-sided C7-C8 radiculopathy and C6-T1 foraminal stenosis. The general anesthetic maintenance regimen of 0.3 MAC sevoflurane and 100 microg/kg/min propofol was paused, and a wake-up test was initiated. Full upper and lower extremity motor function was observed. A thorough review of the patient's medical history revealed the potential risk factor of full recovery from poliomyelitis as a child. The sevoflurane was removed from the anesthetic regimen, and the lower extremity TCMEPs returned and were present for the remainder of the surgery.

Altitude Sickness in Climbers and Efficacy of NSAIDs Trial (ASCENT): randomized, controlled trial of ibuprofen versus placebo for prevention of altitude illness.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of ibuprofen versus placebo in preventing acute mountain sickness (AMS) and high altitude headache (HAH). METHODS: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four healthy Western trekkers were recruited on the Everest approach at 4280 m or 4358 m and randomly assigned to receive either 600 mg of ibuprofen or placebo 3 times daily before and during ascent to 4928 m. One hundred eighty-three of 294 participants completed the trial. Of the participants who did not complete the trial, 62 were lost to follow-up and another 49 broke trial protocol. In an intent-to-treat analysis (232 participants), ibuprofen was found to be more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of AMS (24.4% vs 40.4%; P = .01) and the incidence of HAH (42.3% vs 60.5%; P < .01). Ibuprofen was also superior to placebo in reducing the severity of HAH (4.9% vs 14.7%; P = .01). The end point of oxygen saturation was also higher in the ibuprofen group (80.8 % vs 82.4%; P = .035). For the 183 participants who completed the trial and conformed to the protocol, the incidence of AMS between placebo and treatment groups was not significant (32.9% vs 22.7%; P = .129 for AMS incidence, 9.6% vs 8.2%; P = .74 for AMS severity, 54.8% vs 42.7%; P = .11 for HAH incidence, and 8.2% vs 3.6%; P = .18 for HAH severity). CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen was found to be effective in preventing AMS in the intent-to-treat analysis group but not in those who completed the trial. This loss of significance in the subjects who completed the trial may be explained by persons in the placebo group having a higher burden of illness and associated decreased compliance with the protocol. An important limitation of this study may be the possibility that ibuprofen can mask headache, which is a compulsory criterion for the diagnosis of AMS.

Ibuprofen prevents altitude illness: a randomized controlled trial for prevention of altitude illness with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Acute mountain sickness occurs in more than 25% of the tens of millions of people who travel to high altitude each year. Previous studies on chemoprophylaxis with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are limited in their ability to determine efficacy. We compare ibuprofen versus placebo in the prevention of acute mountain sickness incidence and severity on ascent from low to high altitude. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers living at low altitude were randomized to ibuprofen 600 mg or placebo 3 times daily, starting 6 hours before ascent from 1,240 m (4,100 ft) to 3,810 m (12,570 ft) during July and August 2010 in the White Mountains of California. The main outcome measures were acute mountain sickness incidence and severity, measured by the Lake Louise Questionnaire acute mountain sickness score with a diagnosis of ≥ 3 with headache and 1 other symptom. RESULTS: Eighty-six participants completed the study; 44 (51%) received ibuprofen and 42 (49%) placebo. There were no differences in demographic characteristics between the 2 groups. Fewer participants in the ibuprofen group (43%) developed acute mountain sickness compared with those receiving placebo (69%) (odds ratio 0.3, 95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.8; number needed to treat 3.9, 95% confidence interval 2 to 33). The acute mountain sickness severity was higher in the placebo group (4.4 [SD 2.6]) than individuals receiving ibuprofen (3.2 [SD 2.4]) (mean difference 0.9%; 95% confidence interval 0.3% to 3.0%). CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, ibuprofen was effective in reducing the incidence of acute mountain sickness.

A paradigm for awake intraoperative memory mapping during forniceal stimulation.

A case report is presented detailing the successful use of awake intraoperative memory testing while using white matter stimulation in order to isolate the fornix tracks involved in memory function. The identification of the white matter tracks of the fornix that were involved in memory function was used to tailor the neurosurgical resection of a third ventricle tumor that was impinging on the fornix in order to successfully preserve memory functioning in the patient.

Spironolactone does not prevent acute mountain sickness: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial by SPACE Trial Group (spironolactone and acetazolamide trial in the prevention of acute mountain sickness group).

OBJECTIVES: Over the last 20 years a number of small trials have reported that spironolactone effectively prevents acute mountain sickness (AMS), but to date there have been no large randomized trials investigating the efficacy of spironolactone in prevention of AMS. Hence, a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of spironolactone in the prevention of AMS. METHODS: Participants were sampled from a diverse population of western trekkers recruited at 4300 m on the Mount Everest base camp approach (Nepal side) en route to the study endpoint at 5000 m. Three hundred and eleven healthy trekkers were enrolled, and 251 completed the trial from October to November 2007. Participants were randomly assigned to receive at least 3 doses of spironolactone 50 mg BID, acetazolamide 250 mg BID, or visually matched placebo. A Lake Louise AMS Score of 3 or more, together with the presence of headache and 1 other symptom, was used to evaluate the incidence and severity of AMS. Secondary outcome measures were blood oxygen content and the incidence and severity of high altitude headache (HAH). RESULTS: Acetazolamide was more effective than spironolactone in preventing AMS (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.60, p < 0.01). Spironolactone was not significantly different from placebo in the prevention of AMS. AMS incidence for placebo was 20.3%, acetazolamide 10.5%, and spironolactone 29.4%. Oxygen saturation was also significantly increased in the acetazolamide group (83% ± 0.04) vs spironolactone group (80% ± 0.05, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone (50 mg BID) was ineffective in comparison to acetazolamide (250 mg BID) in the prevention of AMS in partially acclimatized western trekkers ascending to 5000 m in the Nepali Himalaya.

Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of acetazolamide versus ibuprofen for prophylaxis against high altitude headache: the Headache Evaluation at Altitude Trial (HEAT).

OBJECTIVE: High altitude headache (HAH) is the most common neurological complaint at altitude and the defining component of acute mountain sickness (AMS). However, there is a paucity of literature concerning its prevention. Toward this end, we initiated a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in the Nepal Himalaya designed to compare the effectiveness of ibuprofen and acetazolamide for the prevention of HAH. METHODS: Three hundred forty-three healthy western trekkers were recruited at altitudes of 4280 m and 4358 m and assigned to receive ibuprofen 600 mg, acetazolamide 85 mg, or placebo 3 times daily before continued ascent to 4928 m. Outcome measures included headache incidence and severity, AMS incidence and severity on the Lake Louise AMS Questionnaire (LLQ), and visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five of 343 subjects completed the trial. HAH incidence was similar when treated with acetazolamide (27.1%) or ibuprofen (27.5%; P = .95), and both agents were significantly more effective than placebo (45.3%; P = .01). AMS incidence was similar when treated with acetazolamide (18.8%) or ibuprofen (13.7%; P = .34), and both agents were significantly more effective than placebo (28.6%; P = .03). In fully compliant participants, moderate or severe headache incidence was similar when treated with acetazolamide (3.8%) or ibuprofen (4.7%; P = .79), and both agents were significantly more effective than placebo (13.5%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen and acetazolamide were similarly effective in preventing HAH. Ibuprofen was similar to acetazolamide in preventing symptoms of AMS, an interesting finding that implies a potentially new approach to prevention of cerebral forms of acute altitude illness.

Acetazolamide 125 mg BD is not significantly different from 375 mg BD in the prevention of acute mountain sickness: the prophylactic acetazolamide dosage comparison for efficacy (PACE) trial.

750 mg per day of acetazolamide in the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS), as recommended in the meta-analysis published in 2000 in the British Medical Journal, may be excessive and is controversial. To determine if the efficacy of low-dose acetazolamide 125 mg bd (250 mg), as currently used in the Himalayas, is significantly different from 375 mg bd (750 mg) of acetazolamide in the prevention of AMS, we designed a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The participants were sampled from a diverse population of (non-Nepali) trekkers at Namche Bazaar (3440 m) in Nepal on the Everest trekking route as they ascended to study midpoints (4280 m/4358 m) and the endpoint, Lobuje (4928 m), where data were collected. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 375 mg bd of acetazolamide (82 participants), 125 mg bd of acetazolamide (74 participants), or a placebo (66 participants), beginning at 3440 m for up to 6 days as they ascended to 4928 m. The results revealed that composite AMS incidence for 125 mg bd was similar to the incidence for 375 mg bd (24% vs. 21%, 95% confidence interval, -12.6%, 19.8%), in contrast to significantly greater AMS (51%) observed in the placebo group (95% confidence interval for differences: 8%, 46%; 12%, 49% for low and high comparisons, respectively). Both doses of acetazolamide improved oxygenation equally (82.9% for 250 mg daily and 82.8% for 750 mg daily), while placebo endpoint oxygen saturation was significantly less at 80.7% (95% confidence interval for differences: 0.5%, 3.9% and 0.4%, 3.7% for low and high comparisons, respectively). There was also more paresthesia in the 375-mg bd group (p < 0.02). We conclude that 125 mg bd of acetazolamide is not significantly different from 375 mg bd in the prevention of AMS; 125 mg bd should be considered the preferred dosage when indicated for persons ascending to altitudes above 2500 m.

Neurological conditions at altitude that fall outside the usual definition of altitude sickness.

Altitude sickness in its commonly recognized forms consists of acute mountain sickness and the two life-threatening forms, high altitude cerebral and pulmonary edema. Less well known are other conditions, chiefly neurological, that may arise completely outside the usual definition of altitude sickness. These, often focal, neurological conditions are important to recognize so that they do not become categorized as altitude sickness because, besides oxygen and descent, treatment may be vastly different. Transient ischemic attacks, cerebral venous thrombosis, seizures, syncope, double vision, and scotomas are some of the well-documented neurological disturbances at high altitude discussed here in order to enhance their recognition and treatment.