Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Clin Pathol ; 41(1): 8-17, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22390423

ABSTRACT

In December 2009, the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards committee published the updated and peer-reviewed ASVCP Quality Assurance Guidelines on the Society's website. These guidelines are intended for use by veterinary diagnostic laboratories and veterinary research laboratories that are not covered by the US Food and Drug Administration Good Laboratory Practice standards (Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Chapter 58). The guidelines have been divided into 3 reports: (1) general analytical factors for veterinary laboratory performance and comparisons; (2) hematology, hemostasis, and crossmatching; and (3) clinical chemistry, cytology, and urinalysis. This particular report is one of 3 reports and provides recommendations for control of preanalytical and analytical factors related to hematology for mammalian and nonmammalian species, hemostasis testing, and crossmatching and is adapted from sections 1.1 and 2.3 (mammalian hematology), 1.2 and 2.4 (nonmammalian hematology), 1.5 and 2.7 (hemostasis testing), and 1.6 and 2.8 (crossmatching) of the complete guidelines. These guidelines are not intended to be all-inclusive; rather, they provide minimal guidelines for quality assurance and quality control for veterinary laboratory testing and a basis for laboratories to assess their current practices, determine areas for improvement, and guide continuing professional development and education efforts.


Subject(s)
Blood Chemical Analysis/veterinary , Hematologic Tests/veterinary , Hemostasis/physiology , Pathology, Clinical/organization & administration , Veterinary Medicine/organization & administration , Animals , Blood Chemical Analysis/standards , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/standards , Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/veterinary , Blood Specimen Collection , Erythrocyte Indices/veterinary , Hematologic Tests/standards , Laboratories/standards , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Control , Societies, Scientific/standards , Species Specificity , Veterinary Medicine/standards , Workforce
2.
Vet Clin Pathol ; 39(3): 264-77, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21054473

ABSTRACT

Owing to lack of governmental regulation of veterinary laboratory performance, veterinarians ideally should demonstrate a commitment to self-monitoring and regulation of laboratory performance from within the profession. In response to member concerns about quality management in veterinary laboratories, the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) formed a Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards (QAS) committee in 1996. This committee recently published updated and peer-reviewed Quality Assurance Guidelines on the ASVCP website. The Quality Assurance Guidelines are intended for use by veterinary diagnostic laboratories and veterinary research laboratories that are not covered by the US Food and Drug Administration Good Laboratory Practice standards (Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Chapter 58). The guidelines have been divided into 3 reports on 1) general analytic factors for veterinary laboratory performance and comparisons, 2) hematology and hemostasis, and 3) clinical chemistry, endocrine assessment, and urinalysis. This report documents recommendations for control of general analytical factors within veterinary clinical laboratories and is based on section 2.1 (Analytical Factors Important In Veterinary Clinical Pathology, General) of the newly revised ASVCP QAS Guidelines. These guidelines are not intended to be all-inclusive; rather, they provide minimum guidelines for quality assurance and quality control for veterinary laboratory testing. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a basis for laboratories to assess their current practices, determine areas for improvement, and guide continuing professional development and education efforts.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Laboratories/standards , Pathology, Veterinary/standards , Animals , Calibration/standards , Indicators and Reagents/standards , Manuals as Topic/standards , Medical Laboratory Personnel/standards , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results , Societies, Scientific/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...