Comparison of Pharmacodynamics between Tegoprazan and Dexlansoprazole Regarding Nocturnal Acid Breakthrough: A Randomized Crossover Study

Background/Aims@#Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is expected to overcome the limitations of proton pump inhibitors and effectively control nocturnal acid breakthrough. To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan versus dexlansoprazole regarding nocturnal acid breakthrough in healthy subjects. @*Methods@#In a randomized, open-label, single-dose, balanced incomplete block crossover study, 24 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomized to receive oral tegoprazan (50, 100, or 200 mg) or dexlansoprazole (60 mg) during each of two administration periods, separated by a 7- to 10-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic parameter analysis; gastric monitoring was performed for pharmacodynamic parameter evaluation. @*Results@#All 24 subjects completed the study. Average maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration–time curve, and mean time with gastric pH >4 and pH >6 for tegoprazan demonstrated dose-dependent incremental increases. All the tegoprazan groups reached mean pH ≥4 within 2 hours, whereas the dexlansoprazole group required 7 hours after drug administration. Based on pharmacodynamic parameters up to 12 hours after evening dosing, 50, 100, and 200 mg of tegoprazan presented a stronger acid-suppressive effect than 60 mg of dexlansoprazole. Moreover, the dexlansoprazole group presented a comparable acid-suppressive effect with the tegoprazan groups 12 hours after dosing. @*Conclusions@#All the tegoprazan groups demonstrated a significantly faster onset of gastric pH increase and longer holding times above pH >4 and pH >6 up to 12 hours after evening dosing than the dexlansoprazole group.

Effects of Tegoprazan Versus Esomeprazole on Nighttime Heartburn and Sleep Quality in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Aims@#Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently experience nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbance. Tegoprazan is a new potassium-competitive acid blocker that can rapidly block acid secretion. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of tegoprazan compared with esomeprazole in relieving nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbances. @*Methods@#Patients with erosive esophagitis, nighttime heartburn, and sleep disturbances were randomized to receive tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was time to first nighttime heartburn-free interval. The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was also compared between the 2 groups. @*Results@#A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study. Time to the first nighttime heartburn-free interval was shorter with tegoprazan than with esomeprazole but the difference was not statistically significant (1.5 days vs 3 days, P = 0.151). The percentage of nighttime heartburn-free days was higher in the tegoprazan group but the difference was insignificant (57.8% vs 43.1%, P = 0.107). Adverse events occurred in 2 patients. They were mild in severity. @*Conclusions@#Tegoprazan may induce faster relief of nighttime heartburn symptoms and may improve sleep disorders associated with nighttime heartburn. Further large-scale studies are required to validate our findings.

Comparison of pharmacokinetic characteristics of two Tegoprazan (CJ-12420) formulations in healthy male subjects

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effectively used to treat acid-related diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, many unmet medical needs still exist. As a new treatment option, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), such as tegoprazan, have been developed. This study was performed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PKs) between two formulations (test and reference drugs) of tegoprazan 100 mg tablets. A randomized, single oral dose, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence study was conducted with 12 healthy subjects. Each subject received the test drug or reference drug in the first period and the alternative treatment in the second period. For PK evaluation, blood samples were collected up to 48 hours post-dose in each period. The plasma concentrations of tegoprazan and its active metabolite (M1) were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve from zero to the last measurable time (AUC(last)), were estimated using a non-compartmental method. The plasma concentration-time profiles of the two formulations were comparable. The geometric mean ratios [90% confidence intervals (CIs)] of the test drug to the reference drug for C(max) and AUC(last) were 0.98 (0.85–1.12) and 1.03 (0.93–1.13), respectively. The corresponding values of M1 were 0.99 (0.89–1.11) and 1.01 (0.93–1.09), respectively. The two formulations of tegoprazan exhibited comparable PK profiles, fulfilling the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence.

Pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin and sustained-release metformin fixed-dose combination tablets: two randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover studies in healthy male subjects under fed conditions

Two separate studies were conducted to establish bioequivalence (BE) for two doses of atorvastatin/metformin sustained-release (SR) fixed dose combination (FDC) versus the same dosage of the individual component (IC) tablets in healthy male subjects under fed conditions (study 1, BE of atorvastatin/metformin SR 20/500 mg FDC; study 2, BE of atorvastatin/metformin SR 20/750 mg FDC). Each study was a randomized, open-label, single oral dose, two-way crossover design. Serial blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 36 hours post-dose for atorvastatin and 24 hours for metformin. Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin, 2-OH atorvastatin and metformin were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry. A non-compartmental analysis was used to calculate pharmacokinetic (PK) variables and analysis of variance was performed on the lognormal-transformed PK variables. A total of 75 subjects completed the study 1 (36 subjects) and study 2 (39 subjects). The 90% confidence intervals for the adjusted geometric mean ratio of Cmax and the AUC0-t were within the predefined 0.80 to 1.25 range. The number of subjects reporting at least one adverse event following FDC treatments was comparable to that following IC treatments. The two treatments were well tolerated. Therefore, atorvastatin/metformin SR 20/500 mg and 20/750 mg FDC tablets are expected to be used as alternatives to IC tablets to decrease the pill burden and increase patient compliance.

Phase III Clinical Trial of Revaprazan (Revanex(R)) for Gastric Ulcer / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicenter trial was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of revaprazan, a novel acid pump antagonist, with that of omeprazole in patients with more than one of gastric ulcers. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety two subjects were randomized to 4~8 weeks of treatment with either revaprazan 200 mg or omeprazole 20 mg. The primary efficacy parameter was the cumulative healing rate determined by endoscopy after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment, and the secondary efficacy parameter was an improvement rate of pain. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed revaprazan and omeprazole to have similar cumulative healing rates (93.0% and 89.6%, respectively; p=0.3038). The per-protocol analysis revealed revaprazan and omeprazole to also have similar cumulative healing rates (99.1% and 100%, respectively; p= 0.3229). In both analyses, there were no significant differences in an improvement rate of pain between the two groups. Both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Revaprazan has similar efficacy to omeprazole in the treatment of patients with gastric ulcer with a once a day application of revaprazan 200 mg or omeprazole 20 mg over a 4 to 8-week period. In terms of safety, revaprazan was well tolerated.

Phase III Clinical Trial of Revaprazan (Revanex(R)) for Gastritis / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicenter trial to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of revaprazan, which is a novel acid pump antagonist in comparison with ranitidine for treating patients suffering with acute gastritis and acute aggravation of chronic gastritis. METHODS: Five hundred and twelve subjects were randomized to 2 weeks of treatment with either revaprazan 200 mg q.d. or ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. The primary efficacy parameter was the estimated improvement rate according to endoscopy, and the secondary efficacy parameter was the improvement rate for the subjects' symptoms. RESULTS: The estimated improvement rates at 2 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis) were 79.9% with revaprazan and 60.5% with ranitidine; a significant difference was found between the two groups (p<0.0001). On the per-protocol analysis, the estimated improvement rates for revaprazan and ranitidine were 79.4% and 60.2%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the estimated improvement rates between the two groups (p<0.0001). On both analyses, there were no significant differences between the two groups for the improvement rates of the subjects' symptoms. Both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of revaprazan was higher than that of ranitidine for the estimated improvement rate according to endoscopy and also for the symptomatological improvement rate, and revaprazan was well tolerated by the subjects suffering with gastritis.

Revaprazan (Revanex(R)), a Novel Acid Pump Antagonist, for Duodenal Ulcer: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel, Multi-Center Phase III Clinical Trial / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of revaprazan, a novel acid pump antagonist, versus omeprazole in patients with duodenal ulcer, we performed a randomized, double-blind, phase III, multicenter trial. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty eight patients were randomized to 4 weeks of treatment with either revaprazan 200 mg or omeprazole 20 mg once daily. Primary efficacy parameter was complete ulcer healing by endoscopy, and secondary parameter was the improvement in the severity of daytime and nighttime pain. RESULTS: Healing rates at 4 weeks (intention-to-treat analysis) were 91.7% with revaprazan 200 mg and 91.3% with omeprazole 20 mg; there were no significant differences between two groups (p=0.9228). In per-protocol analysis, healing rates of revaprazan 200 mg and omeprazole 20 mg were 94.4% and 92.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in healing rate between two groups (p=0.5666). There was no significant difference between two groups in improvement rates of daytime and nighttime pain. Both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Revaprazan 200 mg was equivalent to omeprazole 20 mg for both ulcer healing and symptom relief, and was well tolerated in patients with duodenal ulcer.