Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 37(6): 279-85, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15551194

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine has extensively been compared with haloperidol, whereas studies vs. other (conventional) neuroleptics are scarce. This exploratory double-blind 4-week study was designed to compare the efficacy and the safety of olanzapine (OLA) and flupenthixol (FLU) which have recently been considered as a "partially atypical" antipsychotics. METHODS: Twenty-eight inpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned for treatment with OLA (N = 15, 5-20 mg/d) or FLU (N = 13, 5-20 mg/d). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Negative Symptoms Rating Scale (NSRS), plus the Patient Global Impression (PGI) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales, were used to assess the efficacy of both compounds; safety was determined by using the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and by assessing treatment-emergent adverse events. Non-parametric statistics were applied. RESULTS: BPRS and NSRS scores improved in both groups (exploratory tests; all p < or = 0.02). Similar results were observed for CGI-Severity, CGI- and PGI-Improvement. There were no significant group differences. Responder rates (at least 40 % decrease in BPRS total) were 9/13 OLA patients (69 %) and 9/12 FLU patients (75 %). EPS events were reported only in the FLU group (p < 0.01); FLU patients needed significantly more anticholinergic medication. Weight gain was higher in OLA patients (p < 0.01). Overall, fewer patients with adverse events were observed in the OLA group (p = 0.04). No significant changes were noted on SAS and AIMS scores. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study suggest that overall and negative symptomatology improved in both treatment groups, while the safety and tolerability profiles differed for both substances.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Flupenthixol/therapeutic use , Inpatients , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adult , Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale , Case-Control Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Olanzapine , Treatment Outcome
2.
Pharmacopsychiatry ; 34(2): 60-5, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11302565

ABSTRACT

The effects of trimipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) with atypical pharmacological properties, and fluoxetine, a selective serotonine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), were compared in an exploratory analysis using mood and polysomnographic parameters during a six-week double-blind trial in 19 depressed geriatric patients. In sleep EEG measures, trimipramine demonstrated clear-cut effects on sleep measures resulting in higher values for sleep efficiency, total sleep time, stage 2 sleep, and shorter wake time. Under fluoxetine treatment, the proportion of REM sleep was decreased and REM latency was lengthened, whereas no change in REM sleep parameters was observed in the trimipramine group. The present data suggest that early antidepressant effects of medication occur independently of drug-induced changes in objective measures of sleep, i.e. suppression of REM sleep.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Sleep/drug effects , Trimipramine/therapeutic use , Affect/drug effects , Aged , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Fluoxetine/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography/drug effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sleep Stages/drug effects , Sleep, REM/drug effects , Trimipramine/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...