The proxy of renal function that most accurately predicts short- and long-term outcome after acute coronary syndrome.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to determine the most accurate renal function formula that predicts short- and long-term mortality in a wide spectrum of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 8,726 consecutive patients (46.3% ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and 53.7% non-ST-elevation ACS [NSTE-ACS]) enrolled in the ACS survey in Israel. Renal function, assessed using 5 formulas as proxies of creatinine clearance or estimated glomerular filtration rate (Cockcroft-Gault, modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD], Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, Mayo quadratic, and inulin clearance based), varied in applying the different formulas. For both STEMI and NSTE-ACS patients, the Mayo formula yielded the highest mean value (88.9 ± 27.7 and 81.4 ± 29.2 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration the lowest (73.0 ± 23.1 and 67.0 ± 24.1 mL/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively). Using multivariate analysis, worse renal function was independently associated with increased mortality risk by 30% to 40% for each decrement of 10 U of creatinine clearance or estimated glomerular filtration rate in STEMI patients and by 25% to 30% for NSTE-ACS patients, using all 5 formulas. The only formula that more accurately predicted 1-year mortality than the MDRD formula was the Mayo quadratic formula with a 1-year net reclassification index of 0.26 and 0.14 for STEMI and NSTE-ACS patients, respectively, after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: Worse renal function was an independent predictor for short- and long-term mortality using all 5 formulas in a broad spectrum of ACS patients, but only the Mayo quadratic formula had better accuracy in predicting mortality relative to the MDRD, suggesting that it may be the preferred prognosticator among ACS patients.

Temporal trends in the use of high-dose potent statins following acute coronary syndrome in Israel.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the prescription of high-dose potent statin (HDPS) therapy following hospitalization for acute coronary events. STUDY DESIGN: Sub-analysis was made using the data of 3,525 patients enrolled in the 2008 and 2010 Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS). METHODS: Analyses were carried out to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with the prescription of HDPS therapy (atorvastatin 40-80 mg/day or rosuvastatin 20-40 mg/day) at discharge compared with the prescription of lower-dose statins. RESULTS: Among the study patients, 1,387 (39%) were discharged on HDPS, 1,860 (53%) with lower-dose statin regimens and 278 (8%) with no recommendation for statin therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pre-admission usage of HDPS and participation in the more recent (2010) ACSIS survey were independently associated with a higher likelihood of HDPS prescription at discharge from the index event (odds ratio, OR, 21.07, p < 0.001, and 5.61, p < 0.001, respectively), whereas factors independently associated with a lack of HDPS prescription included age >75 years (OR 0.76, p = 0.03), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl on admission (OR 0.67, p < 0.001) and a history of heart failure prior to the index hospitalization (OR 0.54, p = 0.0018). The 30-day compliance with the HDPS regimen was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show increased use of HDPS therapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, although this mode of medical therapy is still underutilized in the important subset of high-risk ACS patients.

Type-II myocardial infarction--patient characteristics, management and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Type-II MI is defined as myocardial infarction (MI) secondary to ischemia due to either increased oxygen demand or decreased supply. This categorization has been used for the last five years, yet, little is known about patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. In the current work we assessed the epidemiology, causes, management and outcomes of type II MI patients. METHODS: A comparative analysis was performed between patients with type-I and type-II MI who participated in two prospective national Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Surveys (ACSIS) performed in 2008 and 2010. RESULTS: The surveys included 2818 patients with acute MI of whom 127 (4.5%) had type-II MI. The main causes of type-II MI were anemia (31%), sepsis (24%), and arrhythmia (17%). Patients with type-II MI tended to be older (75.6±12 vs. 63.8±13, p<0.0001), female majority (43.3% vs. 22.3%, p<0.0001), had more frequently impaired functional level (45.7% vs. 17%, p<0.0001) and a higher GRACE risk score (150±32 vs. 110±35, p<0.0001). Patients with type-II MI were significantly less often referred for coronary interventions (36% vs. 89%, p<0.0001) and less frequently prescribed guideline-directed medical therapy. Mortality rates were substantially higher among patients with type-II MI both at thirty-day (13.6% vs. 4.9%, p<0.0001) and at one-year (23.9% vs. 8.6%, p<0.0001) follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type-II compared to type-I MI have distinct demographics, increased prevalence of multiple comorbidities, a high-risk cardiovascular profile and an overall worse outcome. The complex medical condition of this cohort imposes a great therapeutic challenge and specific guidelines with recommended medical treatment and invasive strategies are warranted.

Sitagliptin pretreatment in diabetes patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: results from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS).

BACKGROUND: Chronic treatment with currently available oral hypoglyemic medications may result in a differential effect on the clinical presentation of diabetic patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We evaluated presentation characteristics and the risk for in-hospital complications and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among 445 patients with diabetes mellitus enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) 2010. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to glucose lowering medications at time of admission for ACS: 1) DPP 4 inhibitors (as monotherapy or in combination; DPP4i), 2) Metformin (monotherapy or in combination, excluding DPP4i) and 3) other oral hypoglycemics. RESULTS: Patients in the DPP4i group displayed similar baseline clinical characteristics to the other 2 groups, with the exception of a younger age and a lower frequency of prior coronary heart disease and chronic renal failure. Medical therapy with DPP4i was associated with a significantly lower in-hospital complication rate (post MI angina, re-infarction, pulmonary edema, infections, acute renal failure and better KILLIP class) (9.7%), lower rates of 30-day MACE (12.9%) and a shorter hospital stay (5.4 ± 3.8 days) as compared with patients treated with metformin (24.4%, 31.6% and 5.6 ± 5.0 days respectively) or other oral hypoglycemic drugs (45.5%, 48.5% and 7.5 ± 6.5 days respectively). Consistently, multivariate logistic regression modeling revealed that treatment with DPP4i was associated with a lower risk for in-hospital complications (OR = 0.129, p = 0.002) and 30-day MACE (OR = 0.157, p = 0.002) compared with other oral hypoglycaemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that chronic treatment with DPP4i may have cardioprotective effects in diabetes patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.