Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12041865

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To present the experience of family planning providers and clients in the UK with the GyneFix intrauterine implant device. METHOD: Audit of 138 GyneFix insertions at the Ella Gordon Family Planning Unit in Portsmouth, from 1997 to 1999. RESULTS: Of 138 attempts at GyneFix insertion, 134 were successful. Forty per cent were inserted in nulliparous women. The removal rate was 15%, half of which were due to unacceptable side-effects. The expulsion rate was 8% ranging over a period of a few days to 12 months after insertion. There were no reported perforations or accidental pregnancies with GyneFix in situ in this series. There were no reported pregnancies as a result of unnoticed expulsion. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study are minimal estimates obtained from a retrospective analysis. The numbers are small but they are comparable to results reported from other family planning centers in the UK. Although GyneFix clearly has a useful role, there is a need for a large-scale prospective randomized study to establish the benefits and potential disadvantages of the GyneFix device.


Subject(s)
Intrauterine Device Expulsion/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Contraception/adverse effects , Contraception/methods , Contraception/statistics & numerical data , England , Family Planning Services/methods , Family Planning Services/standards , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intrauterine Devices/statistics & numerical data , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Parity , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...