Correlation of factor VIIa values with factor VII gene polymorphism, fasting and postprandial triglyceride levels, and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Factor VII plays a pivotal role in coagulation. Factor VIIc levels were reported to be a risk factor for fatal coronary heart disease (CHD). Factor VIIc and VIIag levels were noted to be positively associated with plasma triglyceride (TG) levels and influenced by a VII gene polymorphism. The purpose of this study is to determine whether these associations are related to activated factor VII (factor VIIa). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fasting and 3.5-hour postprandial samples from 216 cases with subclinical atherosclerosis and 341 matched controls selected from the ARIC cohort were assayed for levels of factors VIIa, VIIc, and VIIag and TG, and factor VII codon 353 gene polymorphism. The level of factor VIIa was higher in Arg/Arg than in Arg/Gln+Gln/Gln genotypes, and the difference was in accord with that of factors VIIag and VIIc. However, the factor VIIa difference was statistically insignificant. Factor VIIa values were not correlated with fasting or 3.5-hour postprandial TG levels, nor were they associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: Factor VIIa levels, like factor VIIag and VIIc levels, are influenced by factor VII gene codon 353 polymorphism. However, unlike factor VIIag or VIIc, factor VIIa is not influenced by TG levels; none of these is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis.

Factors predicting complete remission and subsequent disease-free survival after a second course of induction therapy in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia resistant to the first.

Patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with persistent leukemia after their first course (CO1) of induction chemotherapy are generally given a second similar course, although their outcome is known to be worse than CO1 responders even when a complete remission (CR) is achieved. To identify specific patients who should or should not receive a second induction course identical to the first we analyzed outcome in 370 patients with persistent AML after CO1 who received a second identical course. One hundred and forty-two (38%) achieved CR on this course; median subsequent disease-free survival (DFS) in these 142 was 29 weeks and 10% were alive in CR at 5 years. The 5-year DFS of CO2 responders was significantly lower than that of CO1 responders (10 vs 24%, P < 0.001). Logistic regression identified pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities (except inv 16, t(8;21), or t(15;17)), presence of an antecedent hematologic disorder or secondary AML as each having unfavorable prognostic import similar to the case in untreated patients. Treatment with "high-dose' rather than standard-dose cytarabine increased the probability of 2nd course CR. The occurrence of pneumonia, sepsis, or major hemorrhage were prognostically unfavorable, primarily in the high-dose cytarabine group, and, once in CR, DFS was shorter in this group. Equations predicting probability of 2nd course CR were derived. If validated prospectively these could be used to assign patients to either receive a second course of initial induction therapy or to change to salvage or investigational therapy after the first course. Alternatively, they could be used to stratify patients entering a prospective randomized trial comparing these two strategies.

Amsacrine and continuous-infusion high-dose cytosine arabinoside as induction therapy for patients with newly-diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia.

The overall cure rate of adults with newly-diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) treated with continuous infusion high-dose cytarabine (CIHDAC) is comparable to that with standard-dose ara-C plus anthracycline or amsacrine (AMSA). We tested whether the addition of AMSA to CIH-DAC improves the outcome of adults with untreated AML. 75 patients with untreated AML were treated with AMSA (75 mg/m2/day x 4) plus CIHDAC (1.5 g/m2/day x 4) for induction and, if in complete remission (CR), early and late intensification. Results were compared to those in 129 patients treated on a previous study with CIHDAC alone. The principal comparison in both groups was between those 117 patients (AMSA/CIHDAC n = 52, CIHDAC n = 65) who met the initial eligibility criteria for the AMSA/CIHDAC study (risk of early mortality < or = 1) and who were treated at a time when relatively few eligible patients were excluded (19% in the AMSA/CIHDAC group, 34% in the CIHDAC group). There was no difference between regimens in CR rate, remission duration, or survival in this cohort. When attention was turned to all 204 patients, outcome was superior with AMSA/CIHDAC very largely as a result of outcome in patients with APL. Aside from these patients, addition of amsacrine to CIHDAC did not appear to be productive.

A comparison of aztreonam plus vancomycin and imipenem plus vancomycin as initial therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The improved efficacy of imipenem over other beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients has been attributed to its broad spectrum of activity. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, clinical trial was performed comparing vancomycin 1 g every 12 hours plus imipenem/cilassatin 500 mg every 6 hours and the same dose of vancomycin plus aztreonam 2 g every 6 hours for empiric treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer. RESULTS: The imipenem regimen cured 76% of the 148 evaluable episodes compared with a 67% cure rate for the 152 episodes treated with the aztreonam regimen (p = 0.1). Most of the polymicrobial infections (77% or 10/13) treated with the imipenem responded, whereas only 38% (5/13) of these infections responded to the aztreonam regimen. Although the cost of the imipenem regimen was less than the cost of the aztreonam regimen, it was associated significantly more with skin rashes (12/194 vs 3/189, p = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, a poor outcome was independently associated in both instances with the persistence of neutropenia and the presence of pneumonia (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in a multifactorial analysis that included efficacy, toxicity, and cost, the imipenem and aztreonam regimens were comparable.

Prognostic value of residual normal metaphases in acute myelogenous leukemia patients presenting with abnormal karyotype.

Two hundred and forty-four untreated acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) patients with unfavorable karyotypes and 109 others with favorable aneuploid karyotypes were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of having both normal and abnormal metaphases (AN) vs only abnormal metaphases (AA) at AML presentation. The AA and AN groups were similar with respect to known prognostic variables. Among patients with unfavorable karyotypes (-5, 5q-, -7, 7q-, and +8), the AN group had a significantly higher complete remission (CR) rate (46 vs 31%, P = 0.02), and a longer CR duration (P = 0.02) and survival (P = 0.026) than the AA group. The number of patients with other unfavorable karyotypes, such as t(11q23), were too small to evaluate properly. Among those with favorable karyotypes (inv(16) and t(8;21)), on the other hand, both the AN and AA group had similar CR rate, CR duration, and survival. Similarly, in patients with t(15;17), CR duration of the AN and AA groups were similar. These data suggest that, among patients with abnormal karyotypes, residual normal metaphases are associated with a higher CR rate, CR duration and survival, only in patients with unfavourable karyotypes, but not in those with favorable karyotypes.

Cytogenetic evolution following the transformation of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute myelogenous leukemia: implications on the overlap between the two diseases.

Cytogenetic evolution in the myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has been associated with an abrupt shift to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). To investigate the 'evolution' of MDS to AML we compared the karyotypes of MDS patients at presentation and at development of AML. Of 170 patients with MDS who developed AML, 63 had banded karyotypes done at both time points. Fifteen patients had refractory anemia (RA) or RA with ringed sideroblasts (RARS), 27 had RA with excess blasts (RAEB), and 21 had RAEB in transformation (RAEBT). Patients had MDS for at least 12 weeks prior to developing AML. Thirty-one patients received cytotoxic therapy for MDS. Seventeen of 63 patients (27%) acquired a cytogenetic change when they developed AML. This percentage was significantly higher in RA/RARS patients compared to RAEB/RAEBT (53.3 vs. 18.8%, p < 0.01). Age, prior malignancy, cytotoxic therapy for MDS, and time to development of AML did not influence the probability of acquiring a cytogenetic change. The small number of patients did not allow testing for the effect of specific karyotypes on the incidence of cytogenetic change or the effect of this change on AML prognosis. The only recurring cytogenetic change was addition of chromosome 13 which occurred in four of 17 patients who changed. These data suggest that a cytogenetic change may be partly responsible for the transformation of RA/RARS, but not RAEB or RAEBT, to AML. This supports the concept that RAEB, RAEBT, and AML are different manifestations of the same disease, whereas RA/RARS are conditions that predispose to acute leukemia.

Long-term results following treatment of newly-diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia with continuous-infusion high-dose cytosine arabinoside.

The long-term results in 130 patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia treated with continuous infusion high-dose ara-C (1.5 gm/m2/day x 4 days, CIHDAC) were compared with those in 264 patients treated in previous studies with standard dose ara-C (70-90 mg/m2/d x 7 days) plus either adriamycin (Ad-OAP), or amsacrine (AMSA-OAP). All patients have been followed at least 5 years. Patients in first CR at 5 years (FCR5) treated on protocols prior to CIHDAC had only 5% chance of relapse (median subsequent follow-up of 9 years). Therefore, we considered patients in FCR5 potentially cured. The two groups were similar with respect to known prognostic factors and CR rates. Although remission duration and survival were shorter with CIHDAC than Ad-OAP/AMSA-OAP, the percent of patients potentially cured was similar (10 vs. 15%). Marked differences between regimens were seen in inv(16) and t(15;17) patients. CIHDAC was better for patients with inv(16) with more patients in FCR5 (80 vs. 38%), longer remission duration and survival, and lower incidence of CNS relapse (0 vs. 43%). The Ad-OAP/AMSA-OAP protocols were superior in patients with t(15;17). We also measured steady-state ara-CTP concentrations (ara-CTPss) in 54 CIHDAC-treated patients presenting with high-blast count. While there was no correlation between ara-CTPss and response duration, all five patients in FCR5 in whom ara-CTPss was measured had high concentrations. These data support the concept that patients with AML should be treated differently according to cytogenetics. Inv(16) patients should be treated with high-dose ara-C while t(15;17) should rely more on anthracycline exposure.