Characterization of the 12C4 survivin monoclonal antibody and insight into the expression of survivin in human adult tissues.

AIMS: To elucidate the expression and regulation of survivin in normal tissues. METHODS AND RESULTS: A novel monoclonal antibody (12C4) to survivin was generated. Application of this antibody to determine survivin expression in human normal adult tissues revealed that most adult tissues do not express survivin and, where it is present, survivin is largely restricted to a small subset of epithelial cells and cells with proliferative potential such as thymus. Survivin expression among positive tissues showed individual variations, ranging from zero to < 5% positive cells in epithelial cell populations. Testis is the only human adult tissue highly expressing survivin, with 60-70% positivity in the nuclei of spermatogonia. Consistent with deregulated expression of survivin associated with oncogenesis, we found that certain ligands and transcription factors differentially modulate survivin promoter activity in cancer cells versus normal/untransformed cells. CONCLUSION: Deregulation of survivin transcription controls in individual epithelial cells may contribute to oncogenesis in various human adult tissues.

Prostate epithelium-derived Ets transcription factor mRNA is overexpressed in human breast tumors and is a candidate breast tumor marker and a breast tumor antigen.

PURPOSE: There is a need to identify novel breast tumor-associated molecules with a potential as diagnostic/prognostic markers of breast cancer as well as targets of vaccine and drug discovery against this cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used a combination of digital differential display and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) methods to identify breast tumor-associated cDNAs. RESULTS: It was found that prostate epithelium-derived Ets transcription factor (PDEF) and five other cDNAs occur at high frequency in the cDNA libraries from normal human breast tissue and human breast tumors. In contrast, these cDNAs are either undetectable or present at low frequencies in the cDNA libraries from other normal human tissues. RT-PCR expression analysis of PDEF showed it to be overexpressed in 14 of 20 primary human breast tumors and in one metastases tested. Also, consistent with the digital differential display data, RT-PCR analysis of PDEF expression showed highly restricted expression in normal human tissues. Furthermore, we show that PDEF transcript levels are 192-fold higher in the peripheral blood of a breast cancer patient in comparison with two normal individuals and another breast cancer patient. In contrast to PDEF, RT-PCR analysis of the expression of the other three cDNAs, including MYL5, Hs.44017, and Hs.215937, showed that these cDNAs are expressed in several normal human tissues. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PDEF is a breast tumor-associated cDNA and should be further evaluated for its potential as a breast tumor marker and a breast tumor antigen.

Preliminary studies on the prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis mastitis in dairy in cattle in Australia.

A highly sensitive and specific PCR (MB-PCR) was used in preliminary studies to detect M. bovis in milk samples to investigate its association with high somatic cell count (SCC), an indicator of subclinical mastitis and one of the factors in down grading the quality of milk. A total of 186 and 167 herds were tested with 43% and 62% of herds positive for M. bovis in Victoria and North Queensland, respectively. The quarter milks from 52 cows with persistently high SCC were tested by MB-PCR and culture to investigate the association of M. bovis with major mastitis pathogens (MMP). M. Bovis was detected in 77% of cows of which 19% alone had M. bovis without any other bacteria, 17% had M. bovis in combination with major mastitis pathogens and 40% had M. bovis in combination with non-major mastitis pathogens. We believe that M. bovis is widespread in dairy cattle and has the potential to produce disease alone or to predispose the udder to disease caused by major mastitis and environmental pathogens. These studies have revealed a hitherto unrecognised high prevalence of M. bovis in dairy cattle in North Queensland and Victoria in Australia. These initial studies also give a clear association between M. bovis and elevated somatic cell counts.

Development of a specific DNA probe and PCR for the detection of Mycoplasma bovis.

Mycoplasma bovis is responsible for several production diseases in cattle, including mastitis, arthritis, pneumonia, abortion and infertility. Current methodologies for detecting and identifying M. bovis are time consuming and difficult. Tests which rely on antigen or antibody detection have poor sensitivity and specificity. In this paper associated protocols for the development of a hybridization probe and PCR are described. A genomic library (SauIIIA digested) was prepared from M. bovis DNA (Colindale Reference Strain: NC10131:02) and cloned into pUC19. Colony hybridization, using a probe preparation made from purified M. bovis DNA, was used to identify colonies of interest. M. bovis DNA fragments were retrieved from recombinant plasmids by digestion with EcoRI and HindIII. This DNA was used to prepare randomly primed probes for dot blot hybridization analysis with immobilized DNA from M. bovis (two strains), M. dispar, M. agalactiae, M. bovigenitalium (two strains), M. ovipneumoniae, a Group 7 strain, M. arginini and bacteria belonging to different genera. Four probes were found to hybridize only with M. bovis and M. ovipneumoniae DNA, whereas one probe reacted with genomic DNA from only one of the two M. bovis strains. The level of sensitivity of the dot blot hybridization assay was 200 CFU (colony forming units)/mL. To enhance the sensitivity further, an M. bovis-specific PCR assay was developed. The primers were designed using sequences obtained from the probe DNA which discriminated M. bovis from all other Mycoplasma DNA tested. The minimum amount of target DNA that could be detected by the PCR assay was that isolated from 10-20 CFU/mL. The PCR assay was therefore 10 times more sensitive than dot blot hybridization.