[Asymptomatic third molars; To remove or not to remove?] / Een klachtenvrije derde molaar, verwijderen of niet?

Three adult patients, ages 28 (female), 36 (male) and 53 (male), respectively, were referred by their dentists to an orofacial surgeon concerning problems with their third molars. With the woman, teeth 38 and 48 were removed. After the removal of tooth 38, a permanent periodontal attachment loss of the adjoining second molar occurred. With the second patient, retention of tooth 48 caused serious damage to the adjoining second molar, resulting in the loss of the tooth. At the time of removal, there was a question of increased risk of inflammatory complications and nerve damage. With the third patient, removal of his impacted tooth 38 led to osteomyelitis and a fracture of the angle of the mandible. According to the newly published 'Third molar' in the Dutch Clinical Guidelines, the advice is to consider the removal of asymptomatic third molars in 17-year-old patients. In the case of impacted third molars with mesial or horizontal angulation and partial eruption, the risk of pathology is such that preventive removal is advised. An intraoral radiograph (periapical or bitewing) as a first screening is recommended here.

Volumetric osseous changes in the completely edentulous maxilla after sinus grafting and lateral bone augmentation: a systematic review.

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the volumetric changes associated with different bone grafting techniques in the completely edentulous atrophic maxilla before dental implant placement. A search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A PICO question was formed, and the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, covering the period 2000-2018. Relevant data were extracted from the results regarding study population, surgical details, technical information on volumetric data acquirement, and volumetric outcome after bone augmentation procedures before implant placement. Six articles with a combined population of 84 patients were included. All patients had a completely edentulous maxilla, with a crestal horizontal width of <3-4mm or a crestal vertical height of <6-7mm. The iliac bone and ascending ramus were most frequently used as grafts. Five of the six studies reported volumes of sinus inlay graft (SIG) and four reported volumes of lateral bone augmentation (LBA). Radiographic analyses of the augmented areas differed among the studies. Volume loss after bone augmentation procedures ranged from 5% to 50% for SIG and from 5% to 47% for LBA. All surgical augmentation techniques for the edentulous maxilla are prone to resorption; no procedure seemed to be superior, but some interesting observations were made.

Autologous versus prosthetic nasal and auricular reconstruction - patient, professional and layperson perceptions.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the perceptions of aesthetic outcome following the autologous and prosthetic reconstruction of nasal and auricular defects among patients, professionals (oral and maxillofacial surgeons and ear, nose and throat surgeons) and people unfamiliar with reconstructive surgery. The influence of anatomical subunits on the overall perception of nasal and auricular reconstructions was also determined. A total of 119 patients treated for nasal and auricular defects between 1997 and 2016, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months, were selected, and photographs of 77 of these patients (65%) were presented in a digital survey and reviewed using a standardized questionnaire. No clinically relevant correlations were found between the age or gender of patients (as well as those of the respondents) and their scores. Prosthetic reconstructions of nasal and auricular defects were considered advantageous over autologous reconstructions in terms of the subjective aesthetic outcome in the view of the professionals, in particular oral and maxillofacial surgeons; however, the patients judged both techniques to be equally effective in terms of aesthetics. No anatomical subunits were found to have a significant impact on the overall match of a nasal or auricular reconstruction with the patient's face.

Postoperative socket irrigation with drinking tap water reduces the risk of inflammatory complications following surgical removal of third molars: a multicenter randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative irrigation of the socket with drinking tap water on inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was carried out from June 2013 to June 2014. In one arm of the study, patients were instructed to irrigate the tooth socket and surgical site with a Monoject® Curved 412 Tip Syringe (Tyco/healthcare-Kendall, Mansfield, MA, USA) with tap water. In a second arm of the study, the standard postoperative instructions did not include irrigation instructions. The incidences of alveolar osteitis and wound infection were recorded for each group and analyzed by the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients with 333 mandibular third molars were analyzed. According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, inflammatory complications occurred in 18 cases in the Monoject® group (11.4 %) compared to 34 cases (19.1 %) in the control group (p = 0.04). These complications were associated with significant worse outcomes regarding quality of life, pain, and trismus and caused significantly more missed days of work or study. Female gender, age >26, bone removal, deep impacted third molars, less experienced surgeons, and a high amount of debris at the surgical site were also identified as risk factors for developing inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal. CONCLUSION: Irrigation of the surgical site with drinking tap water using a curved syringe following removal of third molars is effective in reducing the risk of inflammatory complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Water is a very accessible, cost-effective irrigant without side effects and the results from this study have proven that it can be used to reduce the risk of inflammatory complications and associated morbidity following lower third molar removal.

Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to panoramic radiography (PR), prior to mandibular third molar removal, in reducing patient morbidity, and to identify risk factors associated with inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, controlled trial was performed at three centres in the Netherlands. Adults with an increased risk for IAN injury, as diagnosed from PR, were included in the study. In one arm of the study, patients underwent an additional CBCT prior to third molar surgery. In a second arm of the study, no additional radiographs were acquired. The primary outcome measure was the number of patient-reported altered sensations 1 week after surgery. As secondary outcome measures, the number of patients with objective IAN injury, with long-term (>6 months) IAN injury, the occurrence of other postoperative complications, the Oral Health Related Quality of Life-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire responses, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale score), duration of surgery, number of emergency visits, and number of missed days of work or study were scored. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients with 320 mandibular third molars were analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The overall incidence of IAN injury 1 week after surgery was 6.3%. No significant differences between CBCT and PR for temporary IAN injury (p = 0.64) and all other secondary outcomes were registered. A lingual position of the mandibular canal (MC) and narrowing, in which the diameter of the MC lumen was decreased at the contact area between the MC and the roots, were significant risk factors for temporary IAN injury. CONCLUSION: Although CBCT is a valuable diagnostic adjunct for identification of an increased risk for IAN injury, the use of CBCT does not translate into a reduction of IAN injury and other postoperative complications, after removal of the complete mandibular third molar. In these selected cases of a high risk for IAN injury, an alternative strategy, such as monitoring or a coronectomy, might be more appropriate. (http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02071030).

The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.

This prospective study evaluated the role of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the treatment of patients with impacted mandibular third molars at increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. Subjects with an increased risk of IAN injury, as diagnosed on panoramic radiographs, were enrolled in this study and underwent additional CBCT imaging. Two oral maxillofacial surgeons independently planned the surgical technique and estimated the risk of IAN injury on panoramic radiographs and on CBCT images. A test of symmetry and the McNemar test were executed to calculate the differences between the two imaging modalities. The study sample comprised 40 patients (mean age 27.6 years) presenting 53 mandibular third molars. Risk assessment for IAN injury based on panoramic radiography compared with CBCT imaging differed significantly (P<0.005). After reviewing the CBCT images, significantly more subjects were reclassified to a lower risk for IAN injury compared with the panoramic radiograph assessments. This change in risk assessment also resulted in a significantly different surgical approach (P<0.03). The results of this study show that CBCT contributes to optimal risk assessment and, as a consequence, to more adequate surgical planning, compared with panoramic radiography.

Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.

This study investigated the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to panoramic radiography in determining the anatomical position of the impacted third molar in relation with the mandibular canal. The study sample comprised 53 third molars from 40 patients with an increased risk of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The panoramic and CBCT features (predictive variables) were correlated with IAN exposure and injury (outcome variables). Sensitivity and specificity of modalities in predicting IAN exposure were compared. The IAN was exposed in 23 cases during third molar removal and injury occurred in 5 patients. No significant difference in sensitivity and specificity was found between both modalities in predicting IAN exposure. To date, lingual position of the mandibular canal was significantly associated with IAN injury. CBCT was not more accurate at predicting IAN exposure during third molar removal, however, did elucidate the 3D relationship of the third molar root to the mandibular canal; the coronal sections allowed a bucco-lingual appreciation of the mandibular canal to identify cases in which a lingually placed IAN is at risk during surgery. This observation dictates the surgical approach how to remove the third molar, so the IAN will not be subjected to pressure.