ABSTRACT
Although incontinence is common in hospital, the prevalence and predictors of continence aid use (continence wear and catheters) are poorly described. A one-day cross-sectional study was conducted in a large university hospital assessing consecutive inpatients (≥55) for their pre-admission and current use of continence aids. Barthel Index, Clinical Frailty Scale and Charlson Co-morbidity scores were recorded. Appropriateness was defined by local guidelines. 355 inpatients, median age 75±17 years, were included; 53% were male. Continence aid use was high; prevalence was 46% increasing to 58% for those ≥75. All-in-one pads were the most common, an overall prevalence of 31%. Older age, lower Barthel and higher frailty scores were associated with continence aid use in multivariate analysis. Inappropriate use of aids was high at 45% with older age being the only independent predictor. Continence aids are often used inappropriately during hospitalisation by older patients. Concerted efforts are required to address this issue.
Subject(s)
Catheters , Hospitals , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is common and important to detect as controlling risk factors, particularly hypertension, may slow onset and progression. There is no consensus as to which cognitive screening instrument (CSI) is most suitable for VCI. We systematically reviewed the psychometric properties of brief CSIs for vascular mild cognitive impairment (VMCI) and vascular dementia (VaD). METHODS: Literature searches were performed using scholarly databases from inception until 31 May 2018. Studies were eligible if participants were aged 18 or older, interviewed face-to-face, and standard diagnostic criteria for VCI were applied, excluding those specifically identifying post-stroke dementia. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were identified including eight types of CSIs (27 subtests/variants) and 4575 participants (1015 with VCI), mean age range: 51.6 to 75.5 years. Most studies compared more than one instrument. Five papers examined clock-drawing; four, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); and three used the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET). The MoCA (AUC > 0.90) and MMSE (AUC: 0.86-0.99) had excellent accuracy in differentiating VaD from controls; the MoCA had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α: .83-.88). The MoCA (AUC: 0.87-0.93) and BMET (AUC: 0.94) had the greatest accuracy in separating VMCI from controls. Most studies had low to moderate risk of bias in all domains of the QUIPS. Data were heterogeneous, precluding a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although few studies were available and further research is required, data suggests that the MoCA is accurate and reliable for differentiating VaD and VMCI from controls.
