Balloon Dilation of the Ureter: A Contemporary Review of Outcomes and Complications.

PURPOSE: During ureteroscopy ureteral balloon dilation may be necessary to allow for passage of endoscopic instruments or access sheaths. We assessed the efficacy and complications associated with ureteral balloon dilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records at 2 institutions from 2000 to 2012 to identify patients who underwent ureteral balloon dilation during ureteroscopic treatment of upper tract stones. An 18Fr balloon dilator was used in all cases. Patients with documented ureteral stricture, radiation therapy or urothelial cancer were excluded from analysis. Primary outcomes were the stone-free rate, operative complications, balloon dilation failure and the postoperative ureteral stricture rate. Complications were divided into intraoperative and postoperative groups according to the Satava and Clavien-Dindo classifications, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients fulfilled study criteria. Median followup was 12 months. The stone-free rate was 72% and median time to first postoperative imaging was 2.8 months. Balloon dilation failed in only 8 patients (5%). Eight intraoperative ureteral perforations (5%) were identified, which were managed by a ureteral stent in 7 patients and a percutaneous tube in 1. Endoscopic re-treatment was required in 4 patients with Satava 2b postoperative complications. The postoperative complication rate was 8% (11 cases). A single ureteral stricture was attributable to balloon dilation. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary review balloon dilation of the ureter before endoscopic treatment of stone disease was associated with a high success rate and few complications. Ureteral balloon dilation may decrease the need for a secondary procedure in patients undergoing ureteroscopy to manage proximal ureteral and intrarenal stones.

Clinical outcomes after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: matched pair comparison with elective ureteroscopy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The outcomes of ureteroscopy (URS) after urgent decompression and antibiotics for patients who initially present with urosepsis because of obstructive urolithiasis have not been previously evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of URS in patients with a recent history of sepsis with those without sepsis. METHODS: The study included 138 patients who underwent URS for stone removal from January 2004 to September 2011 at a university medical center. A matched-pair analysis was performed using three parameters (age, sex, and race) to compare outcomes and complications between 69 patients who had sepsis vs a matched cohort who did not have sepsis before URS. RESULTS: The study included 138 patients, 88 (64%) females and 50 (36%) males with a median age of 57.5 years (range 18-88 years). Patients with previous sepsis had similar patient characteristics and stone-free rates (81% vs 77%) compared with patients without previous sepsis (P>0.05). Patients with previous sepsis, however, had a significantly higher complications rate (20% vs 7%), longer hospital length of stay (LOS), and longer courses of postoperative antibiotics after URS (P<0.05). Sepsis developed postoperatively in two patients with diabetes (one with and one without previous sepsis), and postoperative fever developed in five patients with previous sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: URS after decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis has similar success but higher complication rates, greater LOS, and longer course of postoperative antibiotics. This is important in counseling patients who present for definitive URS after urgent decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis.