ABSTRACT
After the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increasing demand for remote learning and an expansion in the substitution of traditional practical sessions with lab-based virtual tools. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of virtual labs in practicing biochemical experiments and to examine the student's feedback regarding this tool. Virtual and traditional labs training were compared in teaching qualitative analysis of proteins and carbohydrates experiments for first-year medical students. Students' achievements were assessed, and their satisfaction regarding virtual labs was estimated using a questionnaire. A total of 633 students were enrolled in the study. There was a significant increase in the average scores of students performing the virtual lab of protein analysis compared with those trained in a real lab and those who watched videos explaining the experiment (p < 0.001). The opposite was noticed in the qualitative analysis of carbohydrates with significantly high grades of students trained conventionally compared with those who practiced with virtual labs (p < 0.001). Students' feedback rates on the virtual labs were high (>70% satisfaction rate). Most students believed virtual labs were supported with a clear explanation, yet they thought it did not give a realistic experience. Students accepted virtual labs, but they still prefer using them as preparatory to classic labs. In conclusion, virtual labs can offer good laboratory practice in the Medical Biochemistry course. Their impact on students' learning might be increased if selected cautiously and implemented properly in the curriculum.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Laboratories , Pandemics , Perception , Personal Satisfaction , CarbohydratesABSTRACT
The hormone erythropoietin (EPO) has been demonstrated to have cardioprotective properties. The present study investigates the role of EPO to prevent heart failure following cancer treatment with doxorubicin [adriamycin (AD)]. Male Wistar rats (150 ± 10 g) were treated with saline (vehicle control group); with EPO, subcutaneously at 1,000 IU/kg body wt, three times per week for 4 wk (EPO group); with adriamycin, intraperitoneally at 2.5 mg/kg body wt, three times per week for 2 wk (AD group); and with adriamycin and EPO (EPO-AD group). Echocardiographic measurements showed that EPO-AD treatment prevented the AD-induced decline in cardiac function. Each of the hearts was then exposed to ischemia and reperfusion during Langendorff perfusion. The percentage of recovery after ischemia-reperfusion was significantly greater in EPO-AD than the AD-treated group for left ventricular developed pressure, maximal increase in pressure, and rate pressure product. The level of oxidative stress was significantly higher in AD (5 µM for 24 h)-exposed isolated cardiomyocytes; EPO (5 U/ml for 48 h) treatment prevented this. EPO treatment also decreased AD-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, which was associated with the decrease in the Bax-to-Bcl2 ratio and caspase-3 activation. Immunostaining of myocardial tissue for CD31 showed a significant decrease in the number of capillaries in AD-treated animals. EPO-AD treatment restored the number of capillaries. In conclusion, EPO treatment effectively prevented AD-induced heart failure. The protective effect of EPO was associated with a decreased level of oxidative stress and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes as well as improved myocardial angiogenesis.