Comparison of tissue biomarkers between non-schistosoma and schistosoma-associated urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: High-grade urothelial carcinoma either non-Schistosoma (NS-UBC) or Schistosoma (S-UBC)-associated is the tenth cause of death worldwide and represents a serious therapeutic problem. AIM: Evaluation of the immmunohistochemical expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), programmed cell death protein-1 (PDL1), estrogen receptor-alpha (ERα) and UroplakinIII, in the high-grade in NS-UBC and S-UBC as potential prognostic and therapeutic targets analyzed through estimation of area percentage, optical density and international pathological scoring system for each marker. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty high grade urothelial carcinoma cases were enrolled in the study (30 cases of NS-UBC and 30 cases of S-UBC). The cases were immunohistochemically-assessed for TNFα, EGFR, PDL1, ERα and Uroplakin III expression. In S-UBC, parasite load was also evaluated for correlation with the immunohistochemical markers' expression in S-UBC. RESULTS: The area percentage of immune-expression of TNFα and EGFR was higher in S-UBC compared to NS-UBC. On the other hand, the NS-UBC displayed statistically-higher expression of PDL1 and uroplakinIII (p-value <0.001). ERα revealed higher, yet, non-significant expressions in S-UBC compared to NS-UBC (p-value =0.459). PDL1 expression showed the most superior record regarding area percentage (64.6± 34.5). Regarding optical density, TNF-α showed the highest transmittance expression (2.4 ± 0.9). EGFR positively correlated with PDL1 in S-UBC (r= 0.578, p-value =0.001) whereas in NS-UBC, TNFα and PDL1 (r=0.382, p-value=0.037) had positive correlation. Schistosoma eggs in tissues oppose uroplakin III expression and trigger immunomodulation via PDL1. CONCLUSION: Due to lower UroplakinIII expression, S-UBC is supposed to have a poorer prognosis. Hormonal therapy is not hypothesized due to a very minimal ERα expression in both NS-UBC and S-UBC. Regarding immunotherapy, anti-TNF-α is suggested for S-UBC whilst in NS-UBC, blockading PDL1 might be useful. Targeted EGFR therapy seems to carry emphasized outcomes in S-UBC. Correlations encourage combined immune therapy in NS-UBC; nevertheless, in S-UBC, combined anti-EGFR and PDL1 seem to be of benefit.

Protective Effect of Topiramate against Diabetic Retinopathy and Computational Approach Recognizing the Role of NLRP3/IL-1ß/TNF-α Signaling.

The possible impact of topiramate against diabetic retinopathy (DREN) and its molecular mechanisms in relation to the nod-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has not been studied before. Thus, in the present study, we aimed to utilize a computational approach to investigate the possible protective effect of topiramate on experimental DREN and explore its impact on NLRP3/interlukin-1ß signaling and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression. Male albino mice were distributed to four experimental groups and assigned the following categorizations: (i) saline, (ii) diabetic, (iii) diabetic + topiramate 10 mg/kg and (iv) diabetic + topiramate 30 mg/kg. We observed shrinkage of total retinal thickness and elevation in retinal glutamate, malondialdehyde, NLRP3 and interlukin-1ß but decreased glutathione (GSH) levels in the diabetic mice. Additionally, retinal ultra-structures in the diabetic group showed abnormalities and vacuolations in the pigmented epithelium, the photoreceptor segment, the outer nuclear layer, the inner nuclear layer and the ganglion cell layer (GCL). Mice treated with topiramate 10 or 30 mg/kg showed downregulation in retinal malondialdehyde, NLRP3 and interlukin-1ß levels; improvements in the retinal pathologies; enhanced immunostaining for BDNF and improved ultra-structures in different retinal layers. Overall, the current results suggest topiramate as a neuroprotective agent for DREN, and future studies are warranted to further elucidate the mechanism of its protective action.