ABSTRACT
The incidences of cancer are continuously increasing worldwide, affecting life of millions of people. Several factors associated with the internal and external environment are responsible for this deadly disease. The key internal determinants like abnormal hormonal regulation, genetic mutations and external determinants such as lifestyle and occupational factors enhances onset of cancer. From the ancient time, plants were remained as the most trusted source of medicine for the treatment of diverse disease conditions. Extensive studies have been performed for the discovery of effective anticancer agent from the plant and still it is going on. Pentacyclic triterpenoids are biologically active phytochemicals having a different range of activities such as anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, anti-hypertensive, antiulcerogenic and anti-tumor. These compounds generally contain ursane, oleanane, lupane and friedelane as a chief skeleton of pentacyclic triterpenoids which are generally present in higher plants. Isoprene unit, phytochemical, with good antitumor/anticancer activity is required for the biosynthesis of pentacyclic triterpenoids. Mechanisms such as cytotoxicity, DNA polymerase inhibition, regulation of apoptosis, change in signal transductions, interfere with angiogenesis and dedifferentiation, antiproliferative activity and metastasis inhibition are might be responsible for their anticancer effect. Present review spotlights diverse targets, mechanisms and pathways of pentacyclic triterpenoids responsible for anticancer effect.
ABSTRACT
Randia dumetorum (RD) fruits in different form have been ethnopharmacologically reported to possess antiasthmatic property. Therefore, present study was undertaken to evaluate two different extracts of RD i.e., ethyl acetate (RD-EA) and methanol (RD-ME) for bronchorelaxant, anti-inflammatory, mast cell stabilizing and antioxidant effect along with safety margin, according to OECD guidelines for toxicity. RD-ME and RD-EA (1 mg/mL) exhibited 68.75 and 57.39% inhibition of contraction against acetylcholine, while against histamine induced contraction, inhibition observed was 100 and 78.13%, respectively. Moreover, extracts attenuated the experimentally induced inflammation at 200 mg/kg with % inhibition of 41.62 by RD-ME and 30.36 by RD-EA in carrageenan model, while in egg albumin model RD-ME and RD-EA exhibited % inhibition of 48.31 and 33.75, respectively. In addition, RD-ME and RD-EA at 100 microg/mL demonstrated significant decrease in histamine release of 08.31 and 16.71 in C-48/80 induced mast cell degradation. RD extracts also exhibited antioxidant activity in DPPH, reducing power and metal chelation method, along with safe margin for oral administration as observed in acute toxicity evaluation.
