Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 17(12): 1900-6, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21707834

ABSTRACT

This study compares the performance of four commercial multiplex PCR assays (Resplex II Panel v2.0, Seeplex RV15, xTAG RVP and xTAG RVP Fast) and direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) staining and viral isolation. Seven hundred and fifty nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for 17 viral agents. In each assay, the sensitivity and specificity for each target were determined against a composite reference standard. Two hundred and eighty-eight out of 750 (38.4%) specimens were positive by DFA or viral isolation, while an additional 214 (28.5%) were positive by multiplex PCR, for a total positivity rate of 66.9%. Of 502 positive specimens, one virus was detected in 420 specimens (83.7%), two in 77 (15.3%), three in four (0.8%) and four in one case (0.2%). Compared with a composite reference standard, the inter-assay accuracy of the multiplex PCR assays varied, but all were superior to conventional diagnostic methods in detecting a broad range of respiratory viral agents in children. In addition, the sensitivity of two commercial assays, Resplex II Plus PRE and Seeplex Influenza A/B Subtyping, was determined relative to the Astra influenza Screen & Type assay for detection of influenza A viruses, including seasonal influenzas and pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza A virus. Using 75 positive and 55 negative nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza A by the Astra assay, the sensitivity of Seeplex and Resplex was 95.9% and 91.8%, respectively, with a specificity of 100% for both.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Virology/methods , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Viruses/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Nasopharynx/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Virus Cultivation/methods , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/growth & development , Viruses/immunology
2.
J Virol Methods ; 139(2): 220-6, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17118465

ABSTRACT

Concerns about emergence of a pandemic strain of influenza have been increasing. The strains of highly pathogenic influenza A(H5N1) currently circulating are considered among the most plausible candidates for giving rise to a pandemic strain. In this study the design and development of a RT-PCR assay specific for these highly pathogenic influenza A(H5) strains is presented. This is achieved in part by the design of a primer targeting the coding region for the protease cleavage site of the hemagglutinin, and another primer derived from a pan-hemagglutinin RT-PCR assay also presented in this study. It is shown that the HPAI A(H5) specific assay amplifies only the nucleic acids of highly pathogenic A(H5), with a high sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Animals , Birds , DNA Primers , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/classification , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/diagnosis , Influenza in Birds/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(11): 4193-6, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16943352

ABSTRACT

Three commercially available real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays (the Artus RealArt HPA coronavirus LightCycler, the Artus RealArt HPA coronavirus Rotor-Gene, and the EraGen severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus POL assay) and three RNA extraction methodologies were evaluated for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus RNA from 91 stool specimens. The assays' sensitivities were highest (58% to 75%) for specimens obtained 8 to 21 days after symptom onset. The assays were less sensitive when specimens were obtained less than 8 days or more than 21 days after the onset of symptoms. All assays were 100% specific.


Subject(s)
Feces/virology , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Humans , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(8): 2681-8, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16891478

ABSTRACT

The emergence of a novel coronavirus (CoV) as the cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) catalyzed the development of rapid diagnostic tests. Stool samples have been shown to be appropriate for diagnostic testing for SARS CoV, although it has been recognized to be a heterogeneous and difficult sample that contains amplification inhibitors. Limited information on the efficiency of extraction methods for the purification and concentration of SARS CoV RNA from stool samples is available. Our study objectives were to determine the optimal extraction method for SARS CoV RNA detection and to examine the effect of increased specimen volume for the detection of SARS CoV RNA in stool specimens. We conducted a multicenter evaluation of four automated and four manual extraction methods using dilutions of viral lysate in replicate mock stool samples, followed by quantitation of SARS CoV RNA using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR. The sensitivities of the manual methods ranged from 50% to 100%, with the Cortex Biochem Magazorb method, a magnetic bead isolation method, allowing detection of all 12 positive samples. The sensitivities of the automated methods ranged from 75% to 100%. The bioMérieux NucliSens automated extractor and miniMag extraction methods each had a sensitivity of 100%. Examination of the copy numbers detected and the generation of 10-fold dilutions of the extracted material indicated that a number of extraction methods retained inhibitory substances that prevented optimal amplification. Increasing the volume of sample input did improve detection. This information could be useful for the extraction of other RNA viruses from stool samples and demonstrates the need to evaluate extraction methods for different specimen types.


Subject(s)
Feces/virology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , RNA, Viral/analysis , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/isolation & purification , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology
5.
J Neurosurg ; 95(5): 845-52, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11702876

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: A new generation of penetrating electrodes for auditory brainstem implants is on the verge of being introduced into clinical practice. This study was designed to compare electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs) to stimulation of the cochlear nucleus (CN) by microsurgically implanted surface electrodes and insertion electrodes (INSELs) with stimulation areas of identical size. METHODS: Via a lateral suboccipital approach, arrays of surface and penetrating microelectrodes with geometric stimulation areas measuring 4,417 microm2 (diameter 75 microm) were placed over and inserted into the CN in 10 adult cats. After recording the auditory brainstem response (ABR) at the mastoid process, the CN, and the level of the inferior colliculus, EABRs to stimulation of the CN were recorded using biphasic, charge-balanced stimuli with phase durations of 80 microsec, 160 microsec, and 240 microsec at a repetition rate of 22.3 Hz. Waveform, threshold, maximum amplitude, and the dynamic range of the responses were compared for surface and penetrating electrodes. The EABR waveforms that appeared for both types of stimulation resembled each other closely. The mean impedance was slightly lower (30 +/- 3.4 kohm compared with 31.7 +/- 4.5 kohm, at 10 kHz), but the mean EABR threshold was significantly higher (51.8 microA compared with 40.5 microA, t = 3.5, p = 0.002) for surface electrode arrays as opposed to penetrating electrode arrays. Due to lower saturation levels of the INSEL array, dynamic ranges were almost identical between the two types of stimulation. Sectioning of the eighth cranial nerve did not abolish EABRs. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical insertion of electrodes into the CN complex may be guided and monitored using techniques similar to those applied for implantation of surface electrodes. Lower thresholds and almost equivalent dynamic ranges indicate that a more direct access to secondary auditory neurons is achieved using penetrating electrodes.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Nucleus/physiology , Electrodes, Implanted , Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem/physiology , Animals , Cats , Electric Stimulation , Microsurgery
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 28(10): 2291-6, 1990 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2229354

ABSTRACT

We studied the biological and antigenic properties of wild strains of echovirus type 25 isolated in France between 1982 and 1987 and compared them with the JV-4 prototype strains isolated in 1957. The wild strains differed from the prototype strain in their cellular tropism. The prototype strain grew readily in five cell lines (MRC5, MA 104, Vero, BGM, and HT 29-18), while for wild strains MRC5 and HT 29-18 cells were the most sensitive and supported growth to high titres (between 4.5 and 7.4 50% tissue culture infective doses per 0.05 ml). Plaques produced by wild strains were larger (6.05 +/- 0.94 mm in diameter [mean +/- standard deviation]) than those of the prototype strain (2.3 +/- 0.97 mm in diameter) and heterogeneous, even after cloning by three terminal dilution passages, which suggested heterogeneous virus populations. Virus neutralization with polyclonal monovalent sera showed that wild strains were significantly less neutralized by two reference immune sera than the prototype strain was. Monoclonal antibodies were raised against the echovirus type 25 JV-4 prototype strain. Nine clones with neutralizing activity were identified. Heterologous neutralizations of 14 clinical isolates revealed highly conserved, moderately conserved, and poorly conserved epitopes. The natural isolates differed from the prototype strain in two to four epitopes and can be classified into four different groups. We concluded that echovirus type 25, like coxsackie- and polioviruses, consists of heterogeneous viral populations with respect to biological and antigenic properties. In term of viral diagnosis, it may become increasingly difficult to identify recently isolated strains because of their antigenic variation.


Subject(s)
Echovirus Infections/diagnosis , Enterovirus B, Human/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antigenic Variation , Echovirus Infections/microbiology , Enterovirus B, Human/classification , Enterovirus B, Human/growth & development , Humans , Neutralization Tests , Viral Plaque Assay
7.
J Med Virol ; 31(2): 129-34, 1990 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2167348

ABSTRACT

A simplified and rapid micromethod based on restriction endonuclease analysis of radiolabelled varicella-zoster virus (VZV) DNA is described and applied to strains for comparison. This procedure is cheaper and less time consuming than that requiring viral nucleocapsid purification (macromethod). The micromethod is suitable for routine DNA analysis of VZV isolates, allows differentiation of vaccine strain from wild strains, and provides evidence for variability of wild strains.


Subject(s)
DNA, Viral/analysis , Herpesvirus 3, Human/classification , Microbiological Techniques , Restriction Mapping , Chickenpox Vaccine , Genetic Variation , Herpesvirus 3, Human/genetics , Humans , Viral Vaccines
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...