The Impacts of Applications of Criminal Law on Medical Practice.

Background: Human health is the single most asset that any one person can and need to have it as qualitative as.. Despite this, however, there are occasions when things go wrong in practice and the patients wind up getting hurt while they are receiving treatment at the healthcare facility Obtaining and maintaining a good health are the goals of individuals and communities, which require having good medical systems. In rare cases, malpractice of medical systems may occur, a matter that affects patients and health providers. Objective: The main objectives of the present study were to review the literature for medical malpractice and how the application of criminal law impacts the medical practice. Methods: This is descriptive review based on the related studies published in scientific literature and deposited in on-line indexed databases. Results and Discussion: Main findings of the study showed that medical errors are likely to increase overtime. Malpractice is likely to take place as if good intention to do the best. Activation of criminal law against medical malpractice may put stress on medical staff, and may be a triggering factor for improving services submitted to the patients. Conclusion: Activation of criminal law against medical errors places stress on medical community from one side, and may be a triggering factor for improving services from another side.

COVID-19 Vaccinations: Medical, Ethical and Legal Aspects.

Background: Following the consideration of COVID-19 as pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), developing new vaccinations against COVID-19 was the dream of humanity. Leading companies competed to achieve this task. Several vaccinations have been developed relatively quickly. Objective: The aim of the present study was to review the literature regarding medical, ethical, and legal aspects of COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: Literature was reviewed regarding various issues of COVID-19 vaccinations. Results and Discussion: The main findings showed that a dilemma exists in literature regarding the ethics in general in keeping the rights of individuals to retain their rights to receive the vaccine and considering receiving the vaccination as compulsory. Conclusion: As the disease has become pandemic with high mortality rates, keeping the safety of the community has received the priority on individual rights, and many countries considered compulsory vaccinations.