Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Case Rep ; 12(7): e9104, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38911921

ABSTRACT

Key Clinical Message: If an intraocular lens (IOL) is incorrectly labeled, problems can arise for surgeons and patients. Precise biometry is important to accurately determine the IOL power and prevent the implantation of the wrong IOL. Labeling and verifying IOLs with accuracy is crucial to ensuring the best possible results of cataract surgery. Abstract: Mislabeling of IOLs can cause unpredictable problems for surgeons. However, we can prevent incorrect IOLs by using precise biometry to determine accurate IOL power and safely implant the correct IOL. A 50-year-old female with no medical or ocular history came to our clinic complaining of decreased vision in both eyes that had been ongoing for several months. After being diagnosed with cataracts, primary angle closure suspect, and high hyperopia, the patient underwent phacoemulsification surgery. A posterior chamber IOL was implanted, and visco-goniosynechialysis was performed. During follow-up appointments, it was discovered that the patient had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/50 in her right eye, which was corrected to 20/20 with a + 7.00 D lens. Upon further evaluation, it was determined that the source of the error was due to a manufacturing mislabeling of the IOL power. The patient then underwent successful IOL exchange surgery, and her best-corrected visual acuity became 20/20 with no significant refraction. This case highlights an uncommon source of refractive surprise after phacoemulsification surgery, successfully managed with IOL exchange surgery using the same IOL power from a different brand.

2.
Case Rep Ophthalmol ; 14(1): 405-410, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37901628

ABSTRACT

Herein, we report a patient with atypical central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) following COVID-19 recovery. A 44-year-old male was referred to the emergency room with a history of diplopia and sudden-onset painless visual loss in his left eye. He had a history of 1-week hospitalization for severe COVID-19 infection with pneumonia 3 weeks before, with positive real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a nasopharyngeal sample. His visual acuity in the left eye was light perception which became no light perception later. Relative afferent pupillary defect was positive in the left eye. He had anterior chamber and anterior vitreous cells due to spillover and white cotton-wool-like patches in the left eye. He was diagnosed with atypical CRAO with uveitis-like features. After 3 weeks, he developed neovascular glaucoma and was treated with panretinal photocoagulation. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2-induced vasculopathy and hypercoagulopathy conditions may be involved in the progression of CRAO in our patient. COVID-19 could be a considerable predisposing factor for CRAO.

3.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 29(2): 489-492, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35730198

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced crystalline maculopathy has been reported secondary to tamoxifen use for breast cancer treatment. It could be misdiagnosed as macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel type 2). CASE REPORT: A 56-year-old woman with a history of diabetes mellitus and breast cancer was referred to our clinic with painless, bilateral, gradual onset of central vision loss for several months. The fundus examination showed the macular pigmentary change in both eyes and a few refractile crystalline deposits in the parafoveal area in the left eye. However, the rest of the retina was normal in both eyes. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: With the diagnosis of tamoxifen-induced maculopathy, the drug was discontinued and supplementary treatment was started. DISCUSSION: In this report, patient medical and drug history was an important and powerful measure. Due to the side effects of long-term use of tamoxifen, we need further studies on the need for retinal screening in these patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Macular Degeneration , Retinal Telangiectasis , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Tamoxifen/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Fluorescein Angiography , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Retinal Telangiectasis/chemically induced , Retinal Telangiectasis/diagnosis , Retinal Telangiectasis/drug therapy , Macular Degeneration/chemically induced , Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/chemically induced , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy
4.
Strabismus ; 30(4): 204-208, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36384422

ABSTRACT

Bupivacaine (BUP) is an anesthetic from the family of aminoacyl anesthetics and has the highest myotoxicity among other groups of anesthetics. Intramuscular injection of BUP first causes acute libriform lysis and subsequently with the regeneration process, stronger myofibrils are formed within 3-4 weeks. Satellite cells, which are actually myogenic stem cells, are preserved in the early stage and during the destruction of muscle fibers. In fact, these cells are responsible for the subsequent regeneration of fibers. BUP is one of the few medicines that is able to increase muscle strength. In animal studies on rabbits, a decrease has been observed in the diameter of the global layer in the first week and an increase in type-I myosin occurs after 60 days, especially in the global muscle layer. There are numerous studies according to BUP injection for the non-surgical management of horizontal strabismus. To intensify the effects of the injection, botulinum toxin injection can also be used simultaneously in the antagonist muscles. In general, although the rate of improvement in strabismus varied among different studies, BUP injection alone corrects about 5-8 prism diopters. Together with botulinum toxin, BUP corrects about 15 prism diopters. The stability of this improvement is up to 10 years after injection. No significant difference has been observed in response rate between patients with esotropia and exotropia. Unlike the large molecule of botulinum toxin, which spreads slowly to its site of action, the BUP molecule is small and must be in direct contact with myofibrils before absorption into the bloodstream to exert its effect. Therefore, the injection volume should be about 3 cc with a concentration of 0.75 g per deciliter. Although BUP is promising non-surgical strabismus management, especially in small angle and residual horizontal strabismus, however, it has its own limitations. The need for direct infusion of a relatively large volume of BUP may be one of its major drawbacks that limits its usage in an office method.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Botulinum Toxins , Esotropia , Strabismus , Animals , Humans , Rabbits , Bupivacaine , Oculomotor Muscles/surgery , Strabismus/drug therapy , Strabismus/surgery , Esotropia/surgery , Botulinum Toxins/pharmacology , Botulinum Toxins/therapeutic use , Injections, Intramuscular , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...