Utility of serum immunoglobulin G4 in distinguishing immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis from cholangiocarcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 (sIgG4) is a feature of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and IgG4-associated cholangitis (IAC); a >2-fold increase in sIgG4 is considered highly specific for these disorders. Many patients with IAC present with biliary strictures and obstructive jaundice, making cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) an important differential diagnosis. We determined the value of sIgG4 in distinguishing IAC from CCA. sIgG4 levels were measured in a test cohort of 126 CCA and 50 IAC patients. The results were confirmed in a validation cohort of 161 CCA and 47 IAC patients. Of the 126 CCA patients in the test cohort, 17 (13.5%) had elevated sIgG4 (>140 mg/dL) and four (3.2%) had a >2-fold (>280 mg/dL) increase. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) was present in 31/126 CCA patients, of whom seven (22.6%) had elevated sIgG4 and two (6.5%) had a >2-fold elevation. Of the 50 IAC patients, 39 (78.0%) had elevated sIgG4 and 25 (50.0%) had a >2-fold increase. The results in the validation cohort were consistent with those of the test cohort. CONCLUSION: Although elevated sIgG4 levels are characteristic of IAC, some patients with CCA, particularly with PSC, have elevated sIgG4 levels, including a small percentage with a more than a 2-fold increase in sIgG4. Therefore, sIgG4 elevation alone does not exclude the diagnosis of CCA. Depending on the prevalence of the two diagnoses, the use of a 2-fold cutoff for sIgG4 may not reliably distinguish IAC from CCA. At a cutoff of 4 times the upper limit of normal, sIgG4 is 100% specific for IAC.

Possible association between IgG4-associated systemic disease with or without autoimmune pancreatitis and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: IgG4-associated systemic disease (ISD) is a multiorgan fibroinflammatory disorder whose pancreatic manifestation is called autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). We describe 3 patients who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma during the follow-up of ISD. METHODS: At our institution's pancreas clinic, we have prospectively and retrospectively examined patients with ISD with (n = 101) or without (n = 10) AIP (mean age, 59 years; 90 males and 21 females). We reviewed the medical records of all 111 patients to identify patients who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma during the follow-up since their first presentation of ISD. Standardized incidence rate was calculated. RESULTS: The 111 patients with ISD with or without AIP had 331 patient-years of observation during which 3 patients had a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma 3 to 5 years after the diagnosis of ISD. In these patients who later developed lymphoma, ISD involved the pancreas (AIP) in 2 and salivary gland in 1. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma had extranodal involvement in all patients (liver [n = 2], adrenal glands [n=1], kidney [n= 1], and lung [n = 1]). Standardized incidence rate was 16.0 (95% confidence interval, 3.3-45.5). CONCLUSIONS: We report 3 cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that developed during the follow-up of ISD suggesting that patients with ISD may be at an increased risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Update on the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is the pancreatic manifestation of a systemic fibroinflammatory disease (IgG4-related systemic disease) in which affected organs demonstrate dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration with abundant IgG4-positive cells. The diagnosis of AIP and its differentiation from pancreatic cancer, its main differential diagnosis, remains a clinical challenge. The five cardinal features of AIP are characteristic histology, imaging, and serology; other organ involvement; and response to steroid therapy. Recent advances in our understanding of these features have resulted in enhanced recognition and diagnosis of this benign disease. This in turn has resulted in the avoidance of unnecessary surgical procedures for suspected malignancy. This article reviews recent updates in the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Model for end-stage liver disease score versus Child score in predicting the outcome of surgical procedures in patients with cirrhosis.

AIM: To determine factors affecting the outcome of patients with cirrhosis undergoing surgery and to compare the capacities of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to predict that outcome. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 195 patients with cirrhosis who underwent surgery at two teaching hospitals over a five-year period. The combined endpoint of death or hepatic decompensation was considered to be the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Patients who reached the endpoint had a higher MELD score, a higher CTP score and were more likely to have undergone an urgent procedure. Among patients undergoing elective surgical procedures, no statistically significant difference was noted in the mean MELD (12.8 +/- 3.9 vs 12.6 +/- 4.7, P = 0.9) or in the mean CTP (7.6 +/- 1.2 vs 7.7 +/- 1.7, P = 0.8) between patients who reached the endpoint and those who did not. Both mean scores were higher in the patients reaching the endpoint in the case of urgent procedures (MELD: 22.4 +/- 8.7 vs 15.2 +/- 6.4, P = 0.0007; CTP: 9.9 +/- 1.8 vs 8.5 +/- 1.8, P = 0.008). The performances of the MELD and CTP scores in predicting the outcome of urgent surgery were only fair, without a significant difference between them (AUC = 0.755 +/- 0.066 for MELD vs AUC = 0.696 +/- 0.070 for CTP, P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The CTP and MELD scores performed equally, but only fairly in predicting the outcome of urgent surgical procedures. Larger studies are needed to better define the factors capable of predicting the outcome of elective surgical procedures in patients with cirrhosis.

Immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis: clinical profile and response to therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Immunoglobulin (Ig)G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) is the biliary manifestation of a steroid-responsive multisystem fibroinflammatory disorder in which affected organs have a characteristic lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate rich in IgG4-positive cells. We describe clinical features, treatment response, and predictors of relapse in IAC and compare relapse rates in IAC with intrapancreatic vs proximal bile duct strictures. METHODS: We reviewed clinical, serologic, and imaging characteristics and treatment response in 53 IAC patients. RESULTS: IAC patients generally were older (mean age, 62 y) men (85%), presenting with obstructive jaundice (77%) associated with autoimmune pancreatitis (92%), increased serum IgG4 levels (74%), and abundant IgG4-positive cells in bile duct biopsy specimens (88%). At presentation, biliary strictures were confined to the intrapancreatic bile duct in 51%; the proximal extrahepatic/intrahepatic ducts were involved in 49%. Initial presentation was treated with steroids (n = 30; median follow-up period, 29.5 months), surgical resection (n = 18; median follow-up period, 58 months), or was conservative (n = 5; median follow-up period, 35 months). Relapses occurred in 53% after steroid withdrawal; 44% relapsed after surgery and were treated with steroids. The presence of proximal extrahepatic/intrahepatic strictures was predictive of relapse. Steroid therapy normalized liver enzyme levels in 61%; biliary stents could be removed in 17 of 18 patients. Fifteen patients treated with steroids for relapse after steroid withdrawal responded; 7 patients on additional immunomodulatory drugs remain in steroid-free remission (median follow-up period, 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: IAC should be suspected in unexplained biliary strictures associated with increased serum IgG4 and unexplained pancreatic disease. Relapses are common after steroid withdrawal, especially with proximal strictures. The role of immunomodulatory drugs for relapses needs further study.

Value of serum IgG4 in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and in distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of elevated serum IgG4 level for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and its ability to distinguish AIP from pancreatic cancer, its main differential diagnosis. METHODS: We measured serum IgG4 levels (normal 8-140 mg/dL) in 510 patients including 45 with AIP, 135 with pancreatic cancer, 62 with no pancreatic disease, and 268 with other pancreatic diseases. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for elevated serum IgG4 (>140 mg/dL) for diagnosis of AIP were 76%, 93%, and 36%, respectively, and 53%, 99%, and 75%, respectively, for IgG4 of >280 mg/dL. Among subjects with elevated IgG4, non-AIP subjects (N = 32) differed from AIP subjects (N = 34) in that they were more likely to be female (45%vs 9%, P < 0.001), less likely to have serum IgG4 >280 mg/dL (13%vs 71%, P < 0.001), or elevation of total IgG (16%vs 56%, P < 0.001). Serum IgG4 levels were elevated in 13/135 (10%) pancreatic cancer patients; however, only 1% had IgG4 levels >280 mg/dL compared with 53% of AIP. Compared with AIP, pancreatic cancer patients were more likely to have CA19-9 levels of >100 U/mL (71%vs 9%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elevated serum IgG4 levels are characteristic of AIP. However, mild (<2-fold) elevations in serum IgG4 are seen in up to 10% of subjects without AIP including pancreatic cancer and cannot be used alone to distinguish AIP from pancreatic cancer. Because AIP is uncommon, IgG4 elevations in patients with low pretest probability of having AIP are likely to represent false positives.

Efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: Although esophageal varices are the most common site of variceal bleeding, extraesophageal varices cause up to 30% of variceal bleeding. Unlike esophageal variceal bleeding, the experience in management of extraesophageal variceal bleeding, especially nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding is limited, and there are no established guidelines for treatment of nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding. This study aims to provide experience in treatment of nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a tertiary medical center. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases, admitted or transferred to Emory University Hospital, with extraesophageal variceal bleeding who had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt as the final resolution to control bleeding over a period of 4 years, from January 1999 to January 2003. We also compared the outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for bleeding from gastric varices and nongastric extraesophageal varices. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (33 gastric varices and 8 nongastric extraesophageal varices) with extraesophageal variceal bleeding who had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt performed were identified in this study period. Bleeding was controlled immediately in 90% (37/41) of those patients. The mortality was 7% (3/41). The rebleeding rate was 10% (4/41). Encephalopathy occurred in 24% (10/41) of the patients. Patients with gastric varices bleeding appeared to have more advanced liver disease than patients with nongastric extraesophageal varices bleeding. The outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for bleeding from gastric varices and nongastric extraesophageal varices were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is an effective and safe treatment of extraesophageal variceal bleeding, including bleeding from gastric varices and nongastric extraesophageal varices.