Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Cytol ; 66(3): 171-178, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108713

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The reported ROM within TBSRTC categories varies widely and depends on several factors in the clinical care pathway for thyroid nodules, including sonographic risk stratification, cytology expertise, selection criteria for surgical resection, and definitions of malignancy used. METHODS: We present 5,867 consecutive thyroid FNAC and corresponding surgical pathology in the context of a comprehensive, single-payer health care system with centralized cytology and surgical pathology services for over 1.5 million inhabitants. RESULTS: We report higher usage of ND and AUS/FLUS categories than the literature (19% vs. <10% and 15% vs. <10%, respectively). Our surgical resection rate for malignant cytology is substantially higher than the literature (94% vs. 50%, respectively). The ROM by the TBSRTC category in our cohort was similar to the literature. The overall diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNAC was 92%, which is similar to other studies. Inclusion of incidental PMC as histologically malignant raised the ROM in the ND, benign, and AUS/FLUS categories. DISCUSSION: The diagnostic performance of thyroid FNAC in our study is similar to the reported literature. Differences in TBSRTC category usage likely arise from cytologist variability and expertise. Our higher surgical resection rate in the malignant cytology category reflects the greater capture of surgical follow-up within our healthcare region with centralized pathology and a single EMR system. Keeping in mind the method of calculation of ROM, the malignancy rate by TBSRTC is similar to previous reports.


Subject(s)
Thyroid Neoplasms , Thyroid Nodule , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Canada , Correlation of Data , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/pathology
2.
Thyroid ; 28(10): 1293-1300, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29897011

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system has reclassified up to one third of differentiated thyroid cancer patients into one of the younger prognostic stage groups (<55 years of age at diagnosis, stage I or stage II). This reclassification widens the spectrum of disease in these lower stages without significantly impacting overall disease-specific survival (DSS) for the entire stage group. However, the optimistic DSS estimates in the <55-year-old stage groups may not accurately reflect the prognosis of individual patients with American Thyroid Association (ATA) high-risk features. Therefore, the aim of this study was to integrate the ATA risk classification system into the eighth edition AJCC staging system to refine and individualize DSS estimates for differentiated thyroid cancer patients aged <55 years at diagnosis. METHODS: Using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center tumor registry, 4881 adult DTC patients aged <55 years at diagnosis receiving initial therapy between 1980 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Using Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center registry coded data, all patients were assigned an eighth edition AJCC stage (I or II), ATA risk of recurrence (low, intermediate, or high), and age group at diagnosis (younger patients defined as ≤45 years old, older patients defined as 45-55 years old). The primary outcome was 10-year DSS. RESULTS: A total of 122 (2.5%) disease-related deaths were observed in the cohort of 4881 patients during a median follow-up of 6.6 years. Integration of the AJCC stage, ATA risk, and age groups identified six subgroups with differing outcomes: (i) stage I/ATA low risk, younger and older, 100% DSS; (ii) stage I/ATA intermediate risk, younger and older, 98% DSS; (iii) stage I/ATA high risk, younger, 95% DSS; (iv) stage I/ATA high risk, older, 89% DSS; (v) stage II/ATA high risk, younger, 78% DSS; and (vi) stage II/ATA high risk, older, 61% DSS. CONCLUSIONS: Integration of AJCC stage, ATA risk, and age group (i) identifies six subgroups of patients with progressively worse DSS as AJCC stage, ATA risk, and age increases, and (ii) provides a more individualized estimate of DSS, especially in ATA high-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...