Inpatient Quality-of-Care Measures for Heart Failure: Treatment Gaps and Opportunities in the Contemporary Era.

BACKGROUND: Quality of care measures are vital tools to assess processes of care within and between health care systems. The 2020 American College of Cardiology/AHA performance measures for heart failure provide a new set of such measures. We evaluated the achievement of these and other performance measures within the Veterans Affairs hospital system in a contemporary cohort of patients hospitalized for heart failure. METHODS: Hospital discharges from January 2010 to February 2021 with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (n=289 810) were evaluated. Adherence to each measure was determined using the measure's stated definition and by site. RESULTS: Among patients with reduced ejection fraction (53.0%), beta blocker use was high (89.0%), ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor, angiotensin receptor blocker, or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use decreased over time (75.3% in 2010, 55.8% in 2020), and hydralazine/nitrate use in eligible Black patients (19.3%) was low. While 68.1% were eligible for ARNI, only 6.0% received them, reaching 17.2% by 2020. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were used in 49.3% of those eligible; laboratory testing 7 days after their initiation was 73.0%, detecting hyperkalemia in 2.2%, although it occurred in 13.7% by 90 days. Achievement of ≥50% target dose was low (beta blocker 45.9%, ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker 31.6%, ARNI 19.0%) and for ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/ARNI, decreased over time. Discharge appointments were 56.2% at 7 days and 78.8% at 14 days. Cardiac rehabilitation referral was low (10.5%) but increased. There were significant site-level differences, particularly for hydralazine, ARNI, devices, and cardiac rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Important inpatient quality of care measures can be readily measured across the Veterans Administration health care system from electronic health records. Treatment gaps and site-level differences persisted into the contemporary era and will likely be exacerbated as newer treatments are added to this complex baseline. These measures and methods also offer the opportunity to target global, local, and individual processes of care for innovative quality improvement initiatives.

Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Heart Failure And Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation are an important atrial fibrillation subgroup in which direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have not been adequately studied in real-world settings. Since DOACs rely on renal elimination and renal dysfunction is prevalent in patients with heart failure, their use may increase bleeding risk, negating some of their advantage over warfarin. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked Veterans Administration databases of patients with heart failure newly started on warfarin or DOACs for atrial fibrillation from October 2010 to August 2017 (23 635 warfarin, 25 823 DOAC). Outcomes included time to first bleeding, stroke, and death using Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Total bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.56-0.68]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.61]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.71-0.78]) were lower with DOAC than warfarin, and with apixaban and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban. Moderate/severe chronic kidney disease was common (48.7%); moderate chronic kidney disease was associated with increased bleeding with DOACs but not warfarin. However, death and bleeding remained lower with DOACs than warfarin across all renal function levels and clinical subgroups. A >20% transient/persistent decline in renal function occurred in 53% of DOAC-treated patients at some point during follow-up, would have required dose reduction in 10.5% of patients, and was associated with increased bleeding. Dose adjustments were made more often, and bleeding and death were lower in patients seen by pharmacists or anticoagulation clinics. There were significant between-site variations in DOAC dosing. CONCLUSIONS: DOACs overall, apixaban, and dabigatran, but not rivaroxaban, were associated with less total bleeding and death than warfarin in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation at all levels of renal function. Renal function decline resulted in increased bleeding in patients with DOACs. DOAC dose adjustment was often indicated, associated with increased bleeding when not adjusted, emphasizing the need for closer monitoring in these patients.

Combination chemotherapy plus dasatinib leads to comparable overall survival and relapse-free survival rates as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The Philadelphia chromosome is associated with a poor prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been regarded as a favorable treatment option in adult Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) ALL, its benefit is less clear in the era of newer generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like dasatinib. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that analyzed the outcomes of adult patients with Ph+ ALL treated with either combination chemotherapy plus dasatinib or combination chemotherapy plus dasatinib followed by allogeneic HSCT. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included; 30 (42.9%) underwent allogeneic HSCT while 40 (57.1%) received only chemotherapy plus dasatinib. In comparing overall survival (OS) rates, results between the 2 groups were similar with a 1-year OS of 93.3% versus 100% (P = 0.20), 2-year OS of 89.8% versus 86.2% (P = 0.72), and 3-year OS of 76% versus 71.3% (P = 0.56) in the transplant versus nontransplant groups, respectively. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were also similar at 70.5% in the transplant group and 80.1% in the nontransplant group (P = 0.94). Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with specific poor prognostic factors (higher white blood count, older age, positive minimal residual disease status), but results again showed no significant survival difference between transplant and nontransplant patients. CONCLUSIONS: While HSCT has historically led to a survival advantage in Ph+ ALL, the results of our study demonstrate that it may have a less beneficial role in the era of newer generation TKIs such as dasatinib.

Safety of Alpha-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether alpha-blocker (AB) use following an admission for heart failure (HF) was associated with an increased risk of HF readmission or death. BACKGROUND: ABs, found to increase the risk of HF in the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) trial, are commonly used for prostatic hypertrophy, including in those with or at risk for HF. METHODS: This propensity score-matched cohort study included patients discharged from a Veterans Affairs hospital between January 2002 and September 2015 with a primary diagnosis of HF and ascertained AB use at discharge. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to compare time to first HF readmission and death at 2 years between groups. Secondary analyses assessed effects by AB dose and type and by beta-blocker (BB) use. RESULTS: Of 169,911 HF patients, 47,638 (28%) were prescribed an AB. Propensity score matching resulted in 35,713 matched pairs. In the propensity score-matched cohort, AB use was associated with fewer HF readmissions (39.8% vs. 41.7% at 2 years; hazard ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92 to 0.97; p < 0.0001) and death (42.8% vs. 46.5%; hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91 to 0.94; p < 0.0001). Nonselective ABs had fewer deaths and HF readmissions (p < 0.0001), while higher AB doses reduced mortality (p < 0.0001). AB treatment was associated with reduced deaths in both BB-treated and untreated patients, with no increase in HF. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of HF patients with an AB was associated not with a higher but instead with a lower rate of HF readmission and death. Higher doses and nonselective ABs were also associated with lower mortality, regardless of BB use. ABs may be used safely in HF patients where clinically indicated. The finding of improved outcomes with ABs may warrant further study.