ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the rate of vaginal birth between double-balloon catheter and oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective and observational study was conducted from 2013 to 2017, at the Saint-Etienne University Hospital where women received induction with a double-balloon catheter for 12 h and at the Grenoble Alpes University Hospital where women received induction with a low-dose oxytocin infusion. Primary outcome was the rate of vaginal birth. RESULTS: Out of 1920 women eligible for attempting a vaginal birth after one previous cesarean section, 501 had a labor induction. Among women with an unfavorable cervix, 160 received a double-balloon catheter in Saint Etienne and 152 received oxytocin alone in Grenoble. The vaginal birth rate was higher in the double-balloon catheter group (61% versus 47% in the oxytocin group). An induction of labor with oxytocin alone reduced chances of vaginal birth (aOR 0.38 CI-95% [0.22-0.66]) compared to cervical ripening with double-balloon catheter. The perinatal morbidity was similar in the two groups. There was, however, 3.9% uterine rupture in the oxytocin group versus 0.6% in the double-balloon group (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: For induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and with unfavorable cervix, cervical ripening with a double-balloon catheter increases the rate of vaginal birth without increased risk of uterine rupture.
Subject(s)
Oxytocics , Uterine Rupture , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean , Catheterization/adverse effects , Cervical Ripening , Cervix Uteri , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Labor, Induced/adverse effects , Oxytocin , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Uterine Rupture/etiology , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/adverse effectsABSTRACT
In 2013, 15 clusters of mumps were notified in France; 72% (82/114) of the cases had been vaccinated twice with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. To determine whether the risk of mumps increased with time since the last vaccination, we conducted a case-control study among clusters in universities and military barracks. A confirmed case had an inflammation of a salivary gland plus laboratory confirmation in 2013. A probable case presented with inflammation of a salivary gland in 2013 either lasting for > 2 days or with epidemiological link to a confirmed case. Controls had no mumps symptoms and attended the same university course, student party or military barracks. We collected clinical and vaccination data via web questionnaire and medical records. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) using logistic regression. 59% (50/85) of cases and 62% (199/321) of controls had been vaccinated twice. The odds of mumps increased for twice-vaccinated individuals by 10% for every year that had passed since the second dose (aOR 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.19; p = 0.02). Mumps immunity waned with increasing time since vaccination. Our findings contributed to the French High Council of Public Health's decision to recommend a third MMR dose during outbreaks for individuals whose second dose dates > 10 years.
