A randomised, open-label trial to assess the optimal treatment strategy in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: the UPSIDE study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic, autoimmune connective tissue disease associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). Currently, there are several treatments available in early dcSSc that aim to change the disease course, including immunosuppressive agents and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). HSCT has been adopted in international guidelines and is offered in current clinical care. However, optimal timing and patient selection for HSCT are still unclear. In particular, it is unclear whether HSCT should be positioned as upfront therapy or rescue treatment for patients refractory to immunosuppressive therapy. We hypothesise that upfront HSCT is superior and results in lower toxicity and lower long-term medical costs. Therefore, we propose this randomised trial aiming to determine the optimal treatment strategy for early dcSSc by comparing two strategies used in standard care: (1) upfront autologous HSCT versus (2) immunosuppressive therapy (intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy followed by mycophenolate mofetil) with rescue HSCT in case of treatment failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The UPSIDE (UPfront autologous hematopoietic Stem cell transplantation vs Immunosuppressive medication in early DiffusE cutaneous systemic sclerosis) study is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, controlled trial. In total, 120 patients with early dcSSc will be randomised. The primary outcome is event-free survival at 2 years after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include serious adverse events, functional status and health-related quality of life. We will also evaluate changes in nailfold capillaroscopy pattern, pulmonary function, cardiac MR and high-resolution CT of the chest. Follow-up visits will be scheduled 3-monthly for 2 years and annually in the following 3 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Dutch Central Committee on Research Concerning Human Subjects (NL72607.041.20). The results will be disseminated through patient associations and conventional scientific channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT04464434; NL 8720.

Features of repeated muscle biopsies and phenotypes of monocytes in paired blood samples and clinical long-term response to treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: In a pilot study we aimed to identify biomarkers in repeated muscle biopsies and paired blood samples, taken before and after conventional immunosuppressive therapy, in order to predict long-term therapeutic response in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). METHODS: Muscle biopsies were selected from 13 new onset patients, six responders and seven non-responders. Repeated muscle biopsies after a median of 11 months follow-up were available from 9 patients and paired peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 5 patients. Treatment response after 3 years was defined by MMT-8 measuring muscle strength and the ACR/EULAR 2016 improvement criteria. Frozen biopsy sections were immunohistochemically stained for expression of CD3, CD66b, IL-15, CD68, CD163 and myosin heavy chain neonatal (MHCn). PBMCs were analysed by flow cytometry for monocyte phenotypes (CD14, CD16, CD68, CX3CR1, and CCR2). RESULTS: Before treatment there were no significant differences in any clinical or muscle biopsy variables or monocyte subsets between responders and non-responders. MMT-8 was significantly higher compared to baseline in the responders at 3-year follow-up. In responders the expression of CD68 in the repeated biopsies was significantly lower compared to non-responders (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline biopsy, monocyte profile or clinical data did not predict long-term treatment response, but in the repeated biopsy within 1 year of immunosuppressive treatment, the lower number of macrophages (CD68+) seemed to predict a more favourable long-term clinical response with regard to improved muscle strength.

Effects of antirheumatic treatments on the prostaglandin E2 biosynthetic pathway.

OBJECTIVE: Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 (mPGES-1) is up-regulated in experimental arthritis and markedly expressed in synovial tissue biopsy samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study was carried out to determine the effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockers and glucocorticoids on mPGES-1 and cyclooxygenase (COX) expression, as well as biosynthesis of PGE(2) in rheumatoid joints. METHODS: In vitro effects of TNF blockers and dexamethasone on the PGE(2) biosynthetic pathway were examined in RA synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs) by flow cytometry. PGE(2) levels in culture supernatants were measured by enzyme immunoassay. Expression of enzymes responsible for PGE(2) synthesis ex vivo was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in synovial biopsy samples obtained from 18 patients before and after treatment with TNF blockers and from 16 patients before and after intraarticular treatment with glucocorticoids. Double immunofluorescence was performed using antibodies against mPGES-1, COX-1, COX-2, and CD163. RESULTS: Double immunofluorescence revealed that mPGES-1 and COX-2 were colocalized in SFMCs as well as in RA synovial tissue cells. The addition of either TNF blockers or dexamethasone suppressed lipopolysaccharide-induced mPGES-1 and COX-2 expression in synovial fluid monocyte/macrophages in vitro and decreased the production of PGE(2). Intraarticular treatment with glucocorticoids significantly reduced both mPGES-1 and COX-2 expression in arthritic synovial tissue ex vivo. The number of COX-1-expressing cells in synovial tissue was also significantly decreased by glucocorticoid treatment. In contrast, neither mPGES-1 nor COX-2 expression in synovial tissue was significantly suppressed by anti-TNF therapy. CONCLUSION: These data are the first to demonstrate the effects of antirheumatic treatments on mPGES-1 expression in RA and suggest that the inhibition of PGE(2) biosynthesis, preferably by targeting mPGES-1, might complement anti-TNF treatment for optimal antiinflammatory results in RA.